Highlighting the model code selection and application process in policy-relevant water quality modelling

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 194, Issue 1-3 SPEC. ISS., 2006, Pages 316-327

  Saloranta, Tuomo M ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN INSTITUTE FOR WATER RESEARCH   (Norway)

Author keywords

Benchmark criteria; Modelling; MyLake; Water management

Indexed keywords

BENCHMARKING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PHOSPHORUS;

BENCHMARK CRITERIA; MODELLING; MYLAKE;

WATER QUALITY;

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; EUTROPHICATION; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER QUALITY;

EURASIA; EUROPE; NORTHERN EUROPE; NORWAY; SCANDINAVIA;

EID: 33644681541     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.10.031     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. V.H. Dale Ecological Modelling for Resource Management 2003 Springer-Verlag New York 328
2. Elorza, F.J., Mira, J., 2003. Matlab implementation of the FAST technique in sensitivity analysis: an estimation of the main effects of input parameters. Technical report, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Spain.
3. D.E. Ford, and H.G. Stefan Thermal predictions using integral energy model J. Hydrau. Div. (ASCE) 106 1980 39 55
4. Holtan, H., 1966. Vansjø: en limnologisk undersøkelse utført i tidsrommet Januar 1964-Januar 1965. NIVA rapport O-5/64, Norwegian Institute for Water Research (in Norwegian).
5. M. Hondzo, and H.G. Stefan Lake water temperature simulation model J. Hydraul. Eng. 119 1993 1251 1273
6. Hutchins, M., Urama, K., Penning, E., Icke, J., Dilks, C., Bakken, T.H., Perrin, C., Saloranta, T., Candela, L., Kämäri, J., in press. The model evaluation tool: guidance for applying benchmark criteria for models to be used in river basin management. Archiv für Hydrobiologie Supplement Large Rivers.
7. M. Koda, G.J. McRae, and J.H. Seinfeld Automatic sensitivity analysis of kinetic mechanisms Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 11 1979 427 444
8. Kämäri, J., Boorman, D., Icke, J., Perrin, C., Candela, L., Elorza, F., Ferrier, R., Bakken, T.H., in press. Process for benchmarking models: dialogue between water managers and modelers. Archiv für Hydrobiologie Supplement Large Rivers.
9. D.P. Larsen, and H.T. Mercier Phosphorus retention capacity of lakes J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 33 1976 1742 1750
10. M. Leppäranta A review of analytical models of sea-ice growth Atmos. Ocean 31 1991 123 138
11. Lyche Solheim. A., Vagstad, N., Kraft, P., Turtumøygard, S., Skoglund, S., Løvstad, Ø., Selvik, J.R., 2001. Tiltaksanalyse for Morsa, Vansjø-Hobol-vassdraget: sluttrapport. NIVA rapport 4377, Norwegian Institute for Water Research (in Norwegian).
12. J.C. Refsgaard, and H.J. Henriksen Modelling guidelines - terminology and guiding principles Adv. Water Res. 27 2004 71 82
13. M.J. Riley, and H.G. Stefan MINLAKE: a dynamic lake water quality simulation model Ecol. Model. 43 1988 155 182
14. T. Saloranta Modelling the evolution of snow, snow ice and ice in the Baltic Sea Tellus 52A 2000 93 108
15. Saloranta, T.M., Andersen, T., 2004. MyLake v. 1.1: technical documentation and user's guide. NIVA report 4838, Norwegian Institute for Water Research.
16. T.M. Saloranta, J. Kämäri, S. Rekolainen, and O. Malve Benchmark criteria: a tool for selecting appropriate models in the field of water management. Environ. Manage. 32 2003 322 333 DOI: 10.1007/s00267-003-0069- 3
17. A. Saltelli, K. Chan, and E.M. Scott Sensitivity Analysis 2000 Wiley New York pp. 167-197
18. van der Molen, D., 1999. The role of eutrophication models in water management. PhD. Thesis, Report 99.020, Institute for Inland Water Management and Waste Water Treatment (RIZA), Lelystad, The Netherlands.
19. van Waveren, R.H., Groot, S., Scholten, H., van Geer, F.C., Wösten, J.H.M., Koeze, R.D., Noort, J.J., 1999. Handbook of Good Modelling Practise. STOWA Report 99-05, Dutch Department of Public Works. http://www.info.wau.nl/ research%20projects/gmp.htm.