Selection priority of process areas based on CMMI continuous representation

Information and Management

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 297-307

  Huang, Sun Jen ^a,b,c   Han, Wen Ming ^a  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^b Software Engineering and Management Laboratory   (Taiwan)

^c National Science Council   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Capability maturity model integration; Critical success process areas; Information system characteristics; Project management; Software process improvement

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

CAPABILITY MATURITY INTEGRATION MODEL; INFORMATION SYSTEM CHARACTERISTICS; SOFTWARE PROCESS IMPROVEMENT;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

EID: 33644680151     PISSN: 03787206     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2005.08.003     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. J.G. Brodman, and D.L. Johnson Return on Investment from Software Process Improvement as Measured by US Industry, Software Process Improvement and Practice 1995 John Wiley & Sons Sussex, UK
2. B. Curtis, W.E. Hefley, S. Miller, People Capability Maturity Model, Software Engineering Institute, CMU/SEI-95-MM-02, 1995.
3. CMMI Product Team, Capability Maturity Model Integration, Version1.1, CMMI-SW/SE/IPPD/SS, Staged Representation, CMU/SEI-2002-TR-011, 2002.
4. CMMI Product Team, Capability Maturity Model Integration, Version1.1, CMMI-SW/SE/IPPD/SS, Continuous Representation, CMU/SEI-2002-TR-012, 2002.
5. C.T. Chen Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment Fuzzy Sets and Systems 114 1 2000 1 9
6. J. Cooper, M. Fisher, Software Acquisition Capability Maturity Model, CMU/SEI-2002-TR-010, 2002.
7. S.J. Chen, and C.L. Hwang Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications 1992 Springer-Verlag
8. M. Diaz, and J. Sligo How software process improvement helped Motorola IEEE Software 14 5 1997 75 81
9. M. Delgado, F. Herrera, E. Herrera-Viedma, and L. Martinez Combining numerical and linguistic information in group decision making Journal of Information Sciences 107 1-4 1998 177 194
10. R.E. Doke, and T. Barrier An assessment of information systems taxonomies: time to re-evaluation Journal of information Technology 3 1994
11. Enterprise Process Improvement Collab (EPIC), Systems Engineering Capability Maturity Model, Version 1.1, 1995.
12. P. Ein-Dor, and E. Segev A classification of information system: analysis and interpretation Information System Research 4 2 1993 166 204
13. J.P. Guielford Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education 4th ed. 1965 McGraw-Hill New York
14. M. Gelderman Task difficulty, task variability and satisfaction with management support systems Information and Management 39 7 2002 593 604
15. IFPUG, Function Point Counting Practices Manual, Release 4.2, International Function Point User Group, 2004.
16. C. Jones Software benchmarking IEEE Computer 28 10 1995 102 103
17. C. Lokan, T. Wright, P. Hill, and M. Stringer Organizational benchmarking - using the ISBSG data repository IEEE Software 18 5 2001 26 32
18. C.J. Lokan An empirical analysis of function point adjustment factors Information and Software Technology 42 9 2000 649 659
19. H.S. Lee Optimal consensus of fuzzy opinions under group decision making environment Fuzzy Sets and System 132 2002 303 315
20. G. Mentzas A functional taxonomy of computer-based information system International Journal of Information Management 1994 397 410
21. A. Noushin The impact of software process improvement on quality: in theory and practice Information and Management 40 7 2003 677 689
22. I.T. Oya, and O.R. Walter Analysis of the characteristics of projects in diverse industries Journal of Operations Management 16 1 1998 43 61
23. M.C. Paulk, B. Curtis, M.B. Chrissis, C.V. Weber, Capability Maturity Model for Software, Version 1.1, CMU/SEI-93-TR-24, 1993.
24. W. Royce Software Project Management: A Unified Framework 1998 Addison-Wesley
25. Software Engineering Measurement and Analysis - Maturity Profile 2004 Software Engineering Institute
26. Software Engineering Institute, EPIC, An Integrated Product Development Capability Maturity Model, Carnegie Mellon University, Version 0.9, October 1996.
27. M.V. Tatikonda An empirical study of platform and derivative product development projects The Journal of Product Innovation Management 16 1 1999 3 26