Six Sigma and chemical process safety

International Journal of Six Sigma and Competitive Advantage

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 229-244

  Doble, Mukesh ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY MADRAS   (India)

Author keywords

cause effect diagram (fish bone diagram); chemical process safety; defects per million opportunities; failure mode and effect analysis; hazards and operability study; Pugh matrix; risks per million year; Six Sigma and safety; standard operating procedure; TRIZ innovation tool

Indexed keywords

EID: 33644664215     PISSN: 14792494     EISSN: 14792753     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1504/IJSSCA.2005.006425     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Doble, M. (1994) ‘HAZOP tools for process development’, Chemical Engineering Progress, Vol. 99, No. 6, p.72.
2. Doble, M. (2000) ‘Statistical process control-process capability and product spec’, Chemical Engineering, March, p.82.
3. Doble, M. (2003) ‘Putting Six Sigma process to work’, Chemical Engineering, November, p.62.
4. Grierson, B., Fraser, I., Morrison, A., Niven, S. and Chisholm, G. (2003) ‘40 principles – chemical illustrations’, TRIZ Journal, July.
5. Gygax, R. (1988) ‘Chemical reaction engineering for safety’, Chemical Engineering Science, Vol. 43, No. 8, p.1759.
6. Kletz, T.A. (1991) Plant Design for Safety: A User Friendly Approach, Taylor and Francis.
7. Michaud, P.A. (1995) Accident Prevention and OSHA Compliance, Florida, USA: CRC Press Inc.
8. Tennant, G. (2003) TRIZ for Six Sigma, UK: Mulbury Consulting in e-book format.
9. Tennant, G. (2001) Six Sigma: SPC and TQM in Manufacturing and Service, VT, USA: Gower Publishing Limited.
10. Wheeler, J.M. (2002) ‘Getting started: Six Sigma control of chemical operations’, Chemical Engineering Progress, June, Vol. 98, No. 5, p.76.