Permanent versus temporary restorations after emergency pulpotomies in primary molars

Pediatric Dentistry

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 478-481

  Guelmann, Marcio ^a   Fair, Jodi ^b   Bimstein, Enrique ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b RUTGERS SCHOOL OF DENTAL MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Emergency pulpotomies; Stainless steel crowns; Temporary restorations

Indexed keywords

GLASS IONOMER; IRM CEMENT; KETAC MOLAR; KETAC-MOLAR; METHACRYLIC ACID METHYL ESTER; ROOT CANAL FILLING MATERIAL; STAINLESS STEEL; ZINC OXIDE EUGENOL;

ARTICLE; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECIDUOUS TOOTH; DENTAL SURGERY; EMERGENCY TREATMENT; ENDODONTICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; PRESCHOOL CHILD; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURVIVAL; TOOTH CROWN; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CROWNS; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, TEMPORARY; EMERGENCY TREATMENT; FEMALE; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MALE; METHYLMETHACRYLATES; MOLAR; PULPOTOMY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROOT CANAL FILLING MATERIALS; STAINLESS STEEL; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TOOTH, DECIDUOUS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ZINC OXIDE-EUGENOL CEMENT;

EID: 33644663615     PISSN: 01641263     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Reference Manual. Pediatr Dent 2004;26:116.
2. Primosch RE, Glomb TA, Jerrell RG. Primary tooth pulp therapy as taught in predoctoral pediatric dental programs in the United States. Pediatr Dent 1997;19:118-122.
3. Fuks AB. Current concepts in vital primary pulp therapy. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2002;3:115-120.
4. Scale NS. The use of stainless steel crowns. Pediatr Dent 2002;24:501-505.
5. Rolling I, Thylstrup A. A 3-year clinical follow-up study of pulpotomized primary molars treated with formocresol technique. Scand J Dent Res 1975:83:47-53.
6. Loh A, O'Hoy P, Tran X, Charles R, Hughes A, Kubo K, Messer LB. Evidence-based assessment: Evaluation of the formocresol vs ferric sulfate primary molar pulpotomy. Pediatr Dent 2004;26:401-409.
7. Guelmann M, Fair J, Turner C, Couts FJ. The success of emergency pulpotomies in primary molars. Pediatr Dent 2002;24:217-220.
8. Farooq NS, Coll JA, Kuwabara A, Shelton P. Success rates of formocresol pulpotomy and indirect pulp therapy in the treatment of deep dentinal caries in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent 2000;22:278-286.
9. Moskovitz M, Sammara E, Holan G. Success rate of root canal treatment in primary molars. J Dent 2005; 33:41-47.
10. Anderson RW, Powell BJ, Pashley DH. Microleakage of IRM used to restore endodontic access preparations. Endod Dent Traumatol 1990;6:137-141.
11. Barthel CR, Strobach A, Briedigkeit H, Göbel UB, Roulet JF. Leakage in roots coronally sealed with different temporary fillings. J Endod 1999;25:731-734.
12. Barkhordar RA, Stark M. Sealing ability of intermediate restorations and cavity design used in endodontics. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1990; 69:99-101.
13. Mayer T, Eickholz P. Microleakage of temporary restorations after thermocycling and mechanical loading. J Endod 1997;23:320-322.
14. Guelmann M, Bookmyer KL, Villalta P, Garcia-Godoy F. Microleakage of restorative techniques for pulpotomized primary molars. J Dent Child 2004; 71:209-211.
15. de Souza EM, Cefaly DF, Terada RS, Rodrigues CC, de Lima Navarro MF. Clinical evaluation of the ART technique using high density and resin-modified glass ionomer cements. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2003;3:201-207.
16. Yu C, Gao XJ, Deng DM, Yip HK, Smales RJ. Survival of glass ionomer restorations placed in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) and conventional cavity preparations: 2-year results. Int Dent J 2004;54:42-46.
17. Holan G, Fuks AB, Keltz N. Success rate of formocresol pulpotomy in primary molars restored with stainless steel crown vs amalgam. Pediatr Dent 2002;24:212-216.
18. Holan G, Eidelman E, Fuks AB. Long-term evaluation of pulpotomy in primary molars using mineral trioxide aggregate or formocresol. Pediatr Dent 2005;27:129-136.
19. Marks LAM, van Amerongen WE, Borgmeijer PJ, Groen HJ, Martens LC. Ketac Molar vs Dyract Class II restorations in primary molars: 12-month clinical results. J Dent Child 2000;67:37-41.