Kinetics of metal fixation in soils: Measurement and modeling by isotopic dilution

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 659-663

  Crout, Neil M J ^a   Tye, Andy M ^a   Zhang, Hao ^b   McGrath, Steve P ^c   Young, Scott D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c ROTHAMSTED RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cadmium; Kinetics; Model; Soil; Zinc

Indexed keywords

CADMIUM; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PH EFFECTS; REACTION KINETICS; RISK ASSESSMENT; ZINC;

BIOAVAILABILITY; METAL FIXATION; RADIOLABILE;

SOILS;

CADMIUM; METAL; ZINC;

BIOAVAILABILITY; CADMIUM; FIXATION; SOIL; ZINC;

ACCURACY; BIOAVAILABILITY; CHEMICAL REACTION KINETICS; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONFERENCE PAPER; HALF LIFE TIME; ISOTOPE DILUTION ASSAY; MEASUREMENT; MODEL; PH; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOIL ANALYSIS; SOIL POLLUTION; SOIL PROPERTY;

BIOLOGICAL AVAILABILITY; CADMIUM; ENVIRONMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; KINETICS; METALS; RISK; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOIL; SOIL POLLUTANTS; TIME FACTORS; ZINC;

EID: 33644653538     PISSN: 07307268     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1897/05-069R.1     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Reilly C. 1991. Metal Contamination of Food, 2nd ed. Elsevier Applied Science, London, UK.
2. Hough RL, Breward N, Young SD, Crout NMJ, Tye AM. 2004. Assessing potential risk of heavy metal exposure from consumption of home produced vegetables by urban populations. Environ Health Perspect 112:215-221.
3. Parker DR, Pedlar JF. 1997. Re-evaluating the free ion activity model of trace metal availability to higher plants. Plant Soil 196:223-228.
4. 2+ in soil pore water from the radiolabile metal fraction. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 67:375-385.
5. Hough RL, Tye AM, Crout NMJ, McGrath SP, Young SD. 2005. Evaluating a free ion activity model applied to metal uptake by Lolium perenne L. grown in contaminated soil. Plant Soil 270:1-12.
6. Barrow NJ. 1986. Testing a mechanistic model. II. The effects of time and temperature on the reaction of zinc with a soil. J Soil Sci 37:277-286.
7. Bruemmer GW, Gerth J, Tiller KG. 1988. Reaction kinetics of the adsorption and desorption of nickel, zinc, and cadmium by goethite. I. Adsorption and diffusion of metals. J Soil Sci 39:37-52.
8. Brennan RF. 1990. Reaction of zinc with soil affecting its availability to subterranean clover. 2. Effect of soil properties on the relative effectiveness of applied zinc. Aust J Soil Res 28:303-310.
9. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. 1993 (Revised 1998). Code of good agricultural practice for the protection of soil. PB0617. London, UK.
10. Young SD, Tye A, Carstensen A, Resende L, Crout N. 2000. Methods for determining labile cadmium and zinc in soil. Eur J Soil Sci 51:129-136.
11. Press WH, Flannery BP, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT. 1986. Numerical Recipes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
12. Myung J. 2000. The importance of complexity in model selection. J Math Psychol 44:190-204.
13. Degryse F, Buekers J, Smolders E. 2004. Radiolabile cadmium and zinc in soils affected by pH and source of contamination. Eur J Soil Sci 55:113-121.
14. Papadopoulos P, Rowell DL. 1988. The reactions of cadmium with calcium carbonate surfaces. J Soil Sci 39:23-36.
15. Trivedi P, Axe L. 2000. Modeling Cd and Zn sorption to hydrous metal oxides. Environ Sci Technol 34:2215-2223.