Families’ Experiences of Support Provided by Resource-Oriented Family Professionals in Finland

Journal of Family Nursing

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 195-224

  Häggman Laitila, Arja ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

Author keywords

family professionals; Finnish families; multidisciplinary family services; secondary analysis

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CHILD WELFARE; COMMUNITY CARE; CONSUMER; FAMILY HEALTH; FEMALE; FINLAND; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INFANT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEWBORN; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PRESCHOOL CHILD; SOCIAL SUPPORT; VOLUNTARY WORKER;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; CHILD WELFARE; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; FAMILY HEALTH; FEMALE; FINLAND; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, ORGANIZATIONAL; PROGRAM EVALUATION; SOCIAL SUPPORT; VOLUNTARY WORKERS;

EID: 33644649276     PISSN: 10748407     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1074840705278488     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Anis, M. (1999). Evaluation of resource-focused method: Literature review. (FinSoc Työpapereita 2). Helsinki, Finland: Stakes.
2. Åstedt-Kurki, P., & Paunonen, M. (1999). Future challenges in family nursing science. Journal of Nursing Science, 11, 340-345.
3. Baggaley, S., & Kean, S. (1999). Health visitors as family nurses: A discussion of research, policy, and practice in the United Kingdom. Journal of Family Nursing, 5, 388-403.
4. Baggens, C. A. L. (2004). The institution enters the family home: Home visits in Sweden to new parents by the child health care nurse. Journal of Community Health Nursing, 21(1), 15-27.
5. Borroso, J., Golop, C. J., Sandelowski, M., Meynell, J., Pearce, P. F., & Collins, L. J. (2003). The challenges of searching for and retrieving qualitative studies. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 25(2), 153-178.
6. Clemmens, D. (2003). Adolescent motherhood: A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing, 28(2), 93-99.
7. Crist, J. D., & Tanner, C. A. (2003). Interpretation/analysis methods in hermeneutic interpretive phenomenology. Nursing Research, 52(3), 202-205.
8. Daly, W., & Carnwell, R. (2001). The case for a multi-method approach. Nurse researcher. Evaluation Research in Nursing and Health Care, 8(3), 30-44.
9. Duffy, M. E., Vehviläinen-Julkunen, K., Huber, D., & Varjoranta, P. (1998). Family nursing practice in public health: Finland and Utah. Public Health Nursing, 15(4), 281-287.
10. Eirola, R. (2003). Life control potential of families with small children: Evaluation of family counseling. (Kuopion yliopiston julkaisuja E. Yhteiskuntatieteet 102). Kuopio, Finland: Kopijyvä.
11. Estabrooks, C. A., Field, P. A., & Morse, J. M. (1994). Aggregating qualitative findings: An approach to theory development. Qualitative Health Research, 4, 503-511.
12. Euramaa-Gran, K.-I., Kallinen-Kräkin, S., & Ruskomaa, L. (1999). Parasta oli, että sai puhua, Raportti Lapsiperhe-projektin asiakasperheiden haastatteluista [It was best that I was allowed to speak: An interview survey of the Families With Children Project's families]. Helsinki, Finland: Mannerheimin Lastensuojeluliiton julkaisuja.
13. Feeley, N., & Gottlieb, L. N. (2000). Nursing approaches for working with family strengths and resources. Journal of Family Nursing, 6, 9-24.
14. Ganong, L. H. (1995). Current trends and issues in family nursing research. Journal of Family Nursing, 1, 171-206.
15. Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105-112.
16. Haaranen, A. (2003). Family health promotion: Stimulated recall interview and public health nurse's work. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Kuopio, Kuopio, Finland.
17. Häggman-Laitila, A. (2002). Early support in promoting family health—an analysis of the efficacy of family work. Journal of Social Medicine, 39, 192-207.
18. Häggman-Laitila, A. (2003). Early support needs of Finnish families with small children. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 41(6), 595-606.
19. Häggman-Laitila, A., Pietilä, A.-M., Friis, L., & Vehviläinen-Julkunen, K. (2003). Video home training as a method of supporting family life control. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 12, 93-106.
20. Häggman-Laitila, A., Hotari, A.-M., Euramaa, K.-I., & Päällysaho, K. (2001). Lapsiperhe-projektin asiakas-ja alueraportti vuosilta 1996-2000 [Family work in seven experimental areas in Families With Children Project in 1996-2000]. Helsinki, Finland: Mannerheimin Lastensuojeluliiton julkaisuja, Käpylä Print Oy.
21. Häggman-Laitila, A., Ruskomaa, L., & Euramaa, K.-I. (2000). Varhaista tukea lapsiperheille. Kokemuksia Lapsiperhe-projektin perhetyöstä [Early support of families with children. Experiences of family work in Families With Children Project]. Helsinki, Finland: Mannerheimin Lastensuojeluliiton julkaisuja, Käpylä Print Oy.
22. Hampson, R. B., & Beavers, W. R. (1996). Measuring family therapy outcome in a clinical setting: Families that do better or do worse in therapy. Family Process, 35, 347-361.
23. Hansebo, G., & Kihlgren, M. (2001). Carers’ reflections about their video-recorded interactions with patients suffering from severe dementia. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 10(6), 737-747.
24. Hartrick, G. (1995). Transforming family nursing theory: From mechanicism to contextualism. Journal of Family Nursing, 1, 134-147.
25. Heimo, E. (2002). Identification and psychosocial support of families at psychosocial riskat maternity and child health centres: A longitudinal study in 1997 and 2000. (Annales Universitatis Turkuensis C 184). Turku, Finland: Department of Nursing, University of Turku Painosalama Oy.
26. Heino, T., Berg, K., & Hurtig, J. (2000). Perhetyön ilo ja hämmennys. Lastensuojelun perhetyömuotojen esittelyä ja jäsennyksiä [Joy and confusion in family work. Presentation and analysis of practices of family work in child welfare]. (Aiheita 14/2000). Helsinki, Finland: Stakes.
27. Hulme, P. A. (1999). Family empowerment: A nursing intervention with suggested outcomes for families of children with a chronic health condition. Journal of Family Nursing, 5, 33-50.
28. Hurtig, J. (1999). Huvitusta, hyvitystävai hyödyllistä. Lastensuojelullisen perhekuntoutuksen arviointia [Amusement, replacement, or usefulness. Evaluation of family rehabilitation in child welfare]. (Lapin yliopiston yhteiskuntatieteellisiä julkaisuja B. Tutkimusraportteja ja selvityksiä 30). Rovaniemi, Finland: Lapin Yliopistopaino.
29. Isoniemi, T. (1999). Tavoitteena toimiva perhe, Tapaustutkimus Mannerheimin Lastensuojeluliiton Lapsiperhe-projektin vaikuttavuudesta perhetyön asiakasperheiden kokemusten pohjalta [Toward a functional family—case study of the influence of the Families With Children Project of Mannerheim League for Child Welfare]. Lahti, Finland: Lahti Polytechnic, Faculty of Social and Health Care.
30. Järvinen, R., Åstedt-Kurki, P., Tarkka, T., & Paavilainen, E. (2000). Supporting the everyday life of families with young children: Experiences of parental groups in a child welfare clinic. Journal of Nursing Science, 12(5), 270-280.
31. Jensen, L. A., & Allen, M. N. (1994). A synthesis of qualitative research on wellness-illness. Qualitative Health Research, 4, 349-369.
32. Kaila, P. (2001). Leikki-ikäisen lapsen hoito-ja kasvatusneuvonnan kehittäminen perhekeskeisessä neuvontatyössä [The child care and childrearing counseling of pre-school children in family-focused counseling]. (Turun yliopiston julkaisuja, sarja C, 174). Turku, Finland: Kirjapaino Pika Oy.
33. Kearney, M. H., York, R., & Deatrick, J. A. (2000). Effects of home visits to vulnerable young families. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 32(4), 369-376.
34. Kettunen, T., Poskiparta, M., & Karhila, P. (2002). Empowering health counseling conversation. Journal of Nursing Science, 14(5), 213-222.
35. Koch, T. (1999). An interpretive research process: Revisiting phenomenological and hermeneutical approaches. Nurse Researcher, 6(3), 20-34.
36. Koponen, P., Perälä, M.-L., & Räikkönen, O. (2000). Critical incident techniques as a research method. Journal of Nursing Science, 12(4), 164-172.
37. Koskinen, L., & Jokinen, P. (2001). Focus group interview as a data collection method— moderators’ experiences. Journal of Nursing Science, 13(6), 301-309.
38. Krueger, R. A. (1998). Developing questions for focus groups: Focus group kit, Vol. 3. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39. Leahey, M., & Harper-Jaques, S. (1996). Family-nurse relationships: Core assumptions and clinical implications. Journal of Family Nursing, 2, 133-151.
40. Lynn-McHale, D., & Deatrick, J. (2000). Trust between family and health care provider. Journal of Family Nursing, 6, 210-230.
41. Määttä, P. (1999). Perhe asiantuntijana: Erityiskasvatuksen ja kuntoutuksen käytännöt [Family as expert: Practices of special education and rehabilitation]. Jyväskylä, Finland: Atena, Gummerus.
42. Mäkelä-Näkki, K. (1999). Perhetyön uudet muodot. Kokemuksia Parasta Lapsille ry:n Löytöretki-projektista vuosilta 1994-1998 [New modes of family work. Experiences of the journey of exploration project in 1994-1998]. (Aiheita 37/1999). Helsinki, Finland: Stakes.
43. McNaughton, D. B. (2000). A synthesis of qualitative home visiting research. Public Health Nursing, 17(6), 405-414.
44. Meltaus, A., & Pietilä, A.-M. (1998). Family identity and adolescents’ choices concerning health habits: An interventive interview method for assessing family strengths. Journal of Nursing Science, 10(5), 279-288.
45. Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. (2004). Child health clinics in support of families with children: A guide for staff. Helsinki, Finland: Edita Prima Oy.
46. Noyes, J. (2000). Are nurses respecting and upholding the human rights of children and young people in their care? Paediatric Nursing, 12(2), 23-27.
47. Paavilainen, E. (1998). Child maltreatment in the family: Family functioning and collaboration with public health nurses caring for such families. (Acta Universitatis Tamperensis 604). Tampere, Finland: University of Tampere, Vammala, Vammalankirjapaino Oy.
48. Paavilainen, E., & Åstedt-Kurki, P. (1997). The client-nurse relationship as experienced by public health nurses: Towards better collaboration. Public Health Nursing, 14(3), 137-142.
49. Paunonen, M., & Vehviläinen-Julkunen, K. (1999). Perhe hoitotyössä, teoria, tutkimus ja käytäntö [Family in nursing, theory, research, and practice]. Helsinki, Finland: WSOY.
50. Pelkonen, M., & Hakulinen, T. (2002). An empowerment model for family nursing. Journal of Family Nursing, 14(5), 202-212.
51. Pelkonen, M., & Löthman-Kilpeläinen, L. (2000). Maternity and child health clinics in support of families with children: A survey of research studies and development projects undertaken in the 1990's. (Reports of the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, 10). Helsinki, Finland: Oy Edita Ab.
52. Pietilä, A.-M., & Häggman-Laitila, A. (2003). Hoitotyön vuosikirja, Terveyden edistäminen [Toward the evaluation of the efficacy of health-promotive nursing]. Helsinki, Finland: Kustannusosakeyhtiö Tammi.
53. Priest, H., Roberts, P., & Woods, L. (2002). An overview of three different approaches to the interpretation of qualitative data. Part 1: Theoretical issues. Nurse Researcher, 10(1), 30-42.
54. Robert-Tissot, C., Cramer, B., Stern, D. N., Serpa, S. R., Bachmann, J.-P., Palacio-Espasa, F., (2003). Family nursing in child psychiatric ward and family life situation. Journal of Nursing Science, 15(5), 214-232.
55. Rosenal, L. (1995). Exploring the learners’ world: Critical incident methodology. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 26, 115-118.
56. Sandelowski, M., Docherty, S., & Emden, C. (1997). Focus on qualitative methods. Qualitative metasynthesis: Issues and techniques. Research in Nursing and Health, 20(4), 365-371.
57. Shemmings, D. (2000). Professionals’ attitudes to children's participation in decision-making: Dichotomous accounts and doctrinal contests. Child and Family Social Work, 5(3), 235-243.
58. Sirviö, K. (2003). Families with children as social and health care clients: Workers’ ways to promote health in families with children. Unpublished licentiate thesis, University of Kuopio, Kuopio, Finland.
59. Thorne, S. (1994). Secondary analysis in qualitative research: Issues and implications. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp. 264-280). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
60. Turtiainen, P. (1999). Lähiöprojektin perhetyö: Lastensuojelua vaiyhdyskuntatyötä [Family work in urban project: Child welfare or community work]. (City of Helsinki Urban Facts, Study Reports, 3). Helsinki, Finland.
61. Välimäki, T. (2000). Does Families With Children Project help? An interview survey of families. Kuopio, Finland: University of Kuopio, Faculty of Social Sciences, Nursing Science (preventive).
62. Vehviläinen, C. (1998). Sökande efter livets resurser—evaluering av familjearbetet i Mannerheims Barnskyddsförbundets Barnfamilj-projekt. Helsinki, Finland: Svenska social-och kommunalhögskolan vid HU.
63. Woods, L., Priest, H., & Roberts, P. (2002). An overview of three different approaches to the interpretation of qualitative data. Part 2: Practical illustrations. Nurse Researcher, 10(1), 43-51.