Auditory evoked potentials in females with high and low acceptance of background noise when listening to speech

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Volumn 119, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 1548-1561

  Tampas, Joanna W ^a   Harkrider, Ashley W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCEPTABLE NOISE LEVEL (ANL); AUDITORY BRAINSTEM RESPONSE; BACKGROUND NOISE; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ACOUSTIC NOISE; BRAIN; HUMAN REACTION TIME; NEUROLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SPEECH RECOGNITION;

BIOELECTRIC POTENTIALS;

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; EVOKED RESPONSE; HEARING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEX RATIO; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; FEMALE; HUMANS; NOISE; PITCH PERCEPTION; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 33644649158     PISSN: 00014966     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1121/1.2167147     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Ahveninen, J., Jaaskelainen, I. P., Pekkonen, E., Hallberg, A., Hietanen, M., Näätänen, R., and Sillanaukee, P. (1999). " Post-withdrawl changes in middle-latency auditory evoked potentials in abstinent human alcoholics., " Neurosci. Lett. 268, 57-60.
2. Ashmore, J. F. (1991). " The electrophysiology of hair cells., " Annu. Rev. Physiol. 53, 465-476.
3. Buchsbaum, M. (1976). " Self-regulation of stimulus intensity: Augmenting/reducing and the average evoked response., " in Consciousness and Self-Regulation, edited by, G. E. Schwartz, and, D. Shapiro, (Plenum, New York), pp. 101, 135.
4. Buchsbaum, M., and Silverman, J. (1968). " Stimulus intensity control and the cortical evoked response., " Psychosom. Med. 30, 12-22.
5. Chao, L. L., and Knight, R. T. (1997). " Prefrontal deficits in attention and inhibitory control with aging., " Cereb. Cortex 7, 63-69.
6. Crowley, H. J., and Nabelek, I. V. (1996). " Estimation of client-assessed hearing aid performance based upon unaided variables., " J. Speech Hear. Res. 39, 19-27.
7. Davis, H. (1983). " An active process in cochlear mechanics., " Hear. Res. 9, 79-90.
8. Davis, H., Hirsh, S. K., Popelka, G. R., and Formby, C. (1984). " Frequency selectivity and thresholds of brief stimuli suitable for electric response audiometry., " Audiology 23, 9-74.
9. Dempster, F. N. (1992). " The rise and fall of the inhibitory mechanism: Toward a unified theory of cognitive development and aging., " Dev. Rev. 12, 45-75.
10. Dustman, R. E., Emmerson, R. Y., and Shearer, D. E. (1996). " Life span changes in electrophysiological measures of inhibition., " Brain Cogn 30, 109-126.
11. Elkind-Hirsch, K. E., Stoner, W. R., Stach, B. A., and Jerger, J. (1992). " Estrogen influences auditory brainstem responses during the normal menstrual cycle., " Hear. Res. 60, 143-148.
12. Franklin, C. A., Thelin, J. W., Nabelek, A. K., and Burchfield, S. B. " The effect of speech presentation level on acceptance of background noise in normal-hearing listeners., " J. Am. Acad. Audiol. (in press).
13. Freyaldenhoven, M. F., Thelin, J. W., Plyler, P. N., Nabelek, A. K., and Burchfield, S. B. (2005). " Effect of stimulant medication on the acceptance of background noise in individuals with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder., " J. Am. Acad. Audiol 16 (9), 677-686.
14. Glosser, G., and Goodglass, H. (1990). " Disorders in executive control functions among apahasics and other brain-damaged patients., " J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol 12, 485-501.
15. Gorga, M. P., and Thornton, A. R. (1989). " The choice of stimuli for ABR measurements., " Ear Hear. 10, 217-230.
16. Hall, J. (1992). Handbook of Auditory Evoked Responses, (Allyn and Bacon, Boston), pp. 50-55, 129-134, 45-49.
17. Harkrider, A. W., and Champlin, C. A. (2001a). " Acute effect of nicotine on non-smokers: II. MLRs and 40-Hz responses., " Hear. Res. 160, 89-98.
18. Harkrider, A. W., and Champlin, C. A. (2001b). " Acute effect of nicotine on non-smokers: III. LLRs and EEGs., " Hear. Res. 160, 99-110.
19. Harkrider, A. W., and Smith, B. (2005). " Acceptable noise level, phoneme recognition in noise, and auditory efferent measures., " J. Am. Acad. Audiol 16, 530-545.
20. Harnishfeger, K. K., and Bjorkland, D. F. (1994). " A developmental perspective on individual differences in inhibition., " Learn. Individ. Differ., 6, 331-355.
21. Hashimoto, I. (1982). " Auditory evoked potentials recorded directly from the human VIIIth nerve and brain stem: Origins of their fast and slow components., " Electroencephalogr Clin. Neurophysiol. Suppl. 36, 305-314.
22. Jackler, R. K., and Brackmann, D. E. (1994). Neurotology (Mosby Publishers, St. Louis, MO).
23. Jacobson, G. P., Privitera, M., Neils, J., Grayson, A., and Yeh, H. (1990). " The effects of anterior temporal lobectomy on the middle-latency auditory evoked potential., " Electroencephalogr Clin. Neurophysiol. Suppl. 75, 230-241.
24. Jasper, H. H. (1958). " Report of the committee on methods of clinical examination in electro-encephalography. The ten-twenty electrode system., " Electroencephalogr Clin. Neurophysiol. Suppl. 10, 371-375.
25. Jerger, J., Oliver, T., and Chmiel, R. (1988). " Auditory middle latency response: a perspective., " Semin. Hear. 9, 75-86.
26. Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and Effort (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.), p. 3.
27. Kandel, E. R., Schwartz, J. H., and Jessell, T. M. (2000). Principles of Neural Science, 4th ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York), pp. 123-134.
28. Kavanagh, K. T., Harker, L. A., and Tyler, R. S. (1984). " Auditory brainstem and middle latency responses. I: Effects of response filtering and waveform identification. II: Threshold responses to a 500-Hz tone pip., " Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 93, 1-12.
29. Knight, R. T., Staines, W. R., Swick, D., and Chao, L. L. (1999). " Prefrontal cortex regulates inhibition and excitation in distributed neural networks., " Acta Psychol. 101, 158-178.
30. Kujawa, S. G., and Liberman, M. C. (1997). " Conditioning-related protection from acoustic injury: Effects of chronic de-efferentation and sham surgery., " J. Neurophysiol. 78, 3095-3106.
31. Lei-Zhang, X., Cohen, H. L., Porjesz, B., and Begleiter, H. (2001). " Mismatch negativity in subjects at high risk for alcoholism., " Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res. 3, 230-337.
32. McDowd, J. M., and Filion, D. L. (1992). " Aging, selective attention, and inhibitory processes: A psychophysiological approach., " Psychol. Aging 7, 65-71.
33. McFadden, D., and Champlin, C. A. (2000). " Comparison of auditory evoked potentials in heterosexual, homosexual, and bisexual males and females., " J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 1 (1), 89-99.
34. Moller, A. (1994). " Neural generators of auditory evoked potentials., " in Principles and Applications in Auditory Evoked Potentials, edited by, J. Jacobson, (Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA). pp. 23-46.
35. Moore, J. K. " The human brainstem auditory pathway., " in Neurotology, edited by, R. K. Jackler, and, D. E. Brackmann, (Mosby Publishers, St. Louis, MO, 1994). pp. 1-18.
36. Näätänen, R., and Picton, T. (1987). " The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: A review and an analysis of the component structure., " Psychophysiology 24, 375-425.
37. Nabelek, A. K., Tampas, J. W., and Burchfield, S. B. (2004). " Comparison of speech perception in background noise with acceptance of background noise in aided and unaided conditions., " J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 47, 1001-1011.
38. Nabelek, A. K., Tucker, F. M., and Letowski, T. R. (1991). " Toleration of background noises: Relationship with patterns of hearing aid use by elderly persons., " J. Speech Hear. Res. 34, 679-685.
39. Onishi, S., and Davis, H. (1968). " Effects of duration and rise time of tone bursts on evoked potentials., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 44, 582-591.
40. Petri, A. (1960). " Some psychological aspects of pain and the relief of suffering., " Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 86, 13-27.
41. Petrie, A. (1967). Individuality in Pain and Suffering (Chicago Press, Chicago).
42. Picton, T. W., Hillyard, S. A., Krausz, H. I., and Galambos, R. (1974). " Human auditory evoked potentials. I. Evaluation of components., " Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 36, 179-190.
43. Rajan, R. (1991). " Protective function of the efferent pathways to the mammalian cochlea: A review., " in: Noise Induced Hearing Loss, edited by, A. Dancer,,, D. Henderson,,, R. Salvi,, and, R. Hamernik, (Mosby, St. Louis), pp. 45-59.
44. Rogers, D. S., Harkrider, A. W., Burchfield, S. B., and Nabelek, A. K. (2003). " The influence of listener's gender on the acceptance of background noise., " J. Am. Acad. Audiol 14, 372-382.
45. Rueckert, L., and Grafman, J. (1996). " Sustained attention deficits in patients with right frontal lesions., " Neuropsychologia 34, 953-963.
46. Shucard, J. L., Shucard, D. W., Cummins, K. R., and Campos, J. J. (1981). " Auditory evoked potentials and sex-related differences in brain development., " Brain Lang 13, 91-102.
47. Stapells, D. (2002). " Cortical event-related potentials to auditory stimuli., " in Handbook of Clinical Audiology, edited by, J. Katz, (Lippincot Williams & Wilkins Baltimore, MD), pp. 378-406.
48. Stern, C. E., Sherman, S. J., Kirchhoff, B. A., and Hasselmo, M. E. (2001). " Medial temporal and prefrontal contribution to working memory tasks with novel and familiar stimuli., " Hippocampus 11, 337-346.
49. Tampas, J. W., Harkrider, A. W., and Nabelek, A. K. (2004). " Physiologic correlates of background noise acceptance., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115, 2500-2501.