Validation of the Multidimensional Affect and Pain Survey (MAPS)

Journal of Pain

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 161-169

  Knotkova, Helena ^a,c   Clark, W Crawford ^a,b   Keohan, Mary L ^b   Kuhl, John P ^a   Winer, Rachel T ^a   Wharton, Ralph N ^b  

^a NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b Columbia University ^*  (United States)

^c BETH ISRAEL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Cancer; MAPS; Multidimensional Affect and Pain Survey; Pain; Pain questionnaire; Validity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER PAIN; CANCER PATIENT; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PAIN ASSESSMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOMATOSENSORY STIMULATION; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOOD DISORDERS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEOPLASMS; PAIN; PAIN MEASUREMENT; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOMATOSENSORY DISORDERS;

EID: 33644646609     PISSN: 15265900     EISSN: 15288447     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2005.10.002     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. D.F. Cella, D.S. Tulsky, G. Gray, B. Sarafian, E. Linn, A. Bonomi, M. Siberman, S.B. Yellen, P. Winicour, J. Brannon, K. Eckberg, S. Lloyd, S. Purl, C. Blendowski, M. Goodman, M. Barnicle, I. Steward, M. McHale, P. Bonomi, E. Kaplan, S. Taylor, C.R. Thomas, J. Harris The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale Development and validation of the general measure J Clin Oncol 11 1993 570 579
2. W.C. Clark Pain, emotion and drug-induced subjective states Applications of multivariate scaling G. Adelman B. Smith Encyclopedia of Neuroscience 3rd ed 2003 Elsevier Amsterdam
3. Clark WC: Applications of multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis for assessment of Pain, in Schmidt RF, Willis WD (eds): Encyclopedic Reference of Pain. Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag, 2005, in press
4. W.C. Clark, J.D. Fletcher, M.N. Janal, J.D. Carroll Hierarchical clustering of 270 pain/emotion descriptors Toward a revision of the McGill Pain Questionnaire B. Bromm J. Desmedt Pain and the Brain From Nociception to Sensation 1995 Raven Press New York, NY 319 330
5. W.C. Clark, J.C. Yang, Sl Tsui, K.F. Ng, S. Bennett Clark Pain rating scales A Multidimensional Affect and Pain Survey (MAPS) analysis of what they really measure Pain 98 2002 241 247
6. W.C. Clark, J.P. Kuhl, M.L. Keohan, H. Knotkova, R.T. Winer, G.A. Griswold Factor analysis validates the cluster structure underlying the Multidimensional Affect and Pain Survey (MAPS), and challenges the a priori classification of the descriptors in the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) Pain 106 2003 357 363
7. E. Fernandez, G.J. Boyle Affective and evaluative descriptors of pain in the McGill Pain Questionnaire reduction and reorganization J Pain 3 2002 70 77
8. G.A. Griswold, W.C. Clark Item analyses of cancer patient responses to the Multidimensional Affect and Pain Survey (MAPS) demonstrate high inter-item consistency and discriminability and determines the content of a Short Form (SMAPS-CP) J Pain 6 2005 67 74
9. H. Hochberg, Y. Benjamini More powerful procedures for multiple significance testing Stat Med 9 1990 811 818
10. M.P. Jensen The validity and reliability of pain measures in adults with cancer J Pain 4 2003 2 21
11. M.P. Jensen Questionnaire validation a brief guide for readers of the research literature Clin J Pain 19 2003 345 352
12. D.A. Karnofsky, J.H. Burchenal The clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer C.M. Macleod Evaluation of Chemotherapeutic Agents 1948 Columbia University Press New York, NY 191 205
13. H. Knotkova, W.C. Clark, P. Mokrejs, F. Padour, J. Kuhl What do ratings on unidimensional pain and emotion scales really mean? A Multidimensional Affect and Pain Survey (MAPS) analysis of cancer patients' responses J Pain Sympt Manage 28 2004 19 27
14. J.P. Kuhl, W.C. Clark Gender differences in cold pressor pain are demonstrated by the Multidimensional Affect and Pain Survey (MAPS) factor scores J Pain 5 Suppl 1 2004 100
15. N.K. Lowe, S.N. Walker, R.C. MacCallum Confirming the theoretical structure of the McGill Pain Questionnaire in acute clinical pain Pain 46 1991 53 60
16. D.M. McNair, M. Lorr, L.F. Droppleman Manual for the Profile of Mood States 1971 Educational and Industrial Testing Service San Diego
17. R. Melzack The McGill Pain Questionnaire Major properties and scoring methods Pain 1 1975 277 299
18. R. Melzack, W.S. Torgerson On the language of pain Anesthesiology 334 1971 50 59
19. V. Mor, L. Laliberte, J.N. Morris, M. Wiemann The Karnofsky Performance Status Scale An examination of its reliability and validity in a research setting Cancer 53 1984 2002 2007
20. M.A. Proschan, M.A. Waclawiw Practical guidelines for multiplicity adjustment in clinical trials Control Clin Trials 21 2001 527 539
21. C.C. Schag, R.L. Heinrich, P.A. Ganz Karnofsky performance status revisited Reliability, validity, and guidelines J Clin Oncol 2 1984 187 193
22. B.H. Smith, K.I. Penny, A.M. Purves, C. Munro, B. Wilson, J. Grimshaw, W.A. Chambers, W.C. Smith The Chronic Pain Grade Questionnaire Validation and reliability in postal research Pain 71 1997 141 147
23. A.C. DeC Williams, H.T.O. Davies, Y. Chaudry Simple pain rating scales hide complex idiosyncratic meanings Pain 85 2000 457 463
24. J.W. Yates, B. Chalmer, F.P. McKegney Evaluation of patients with advanced cancer using the Karnofsky Performance Status Cancer 45 1980 2220 2224