Double-blind study on materials testing with applied kinesiology

Journal of Dental Research

Volumn 84, Issue 11, 2005, Pages 1066-1069

  Staehle, H J ^a   Koch, M J ^a   Pioch, T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Applied kinesiology; Complementary therapies; Diagnostic tests; Double blind method; Reproducibility of results

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; FILTEK Z250; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SYNTAC DENTINE ADHESIVE; TETRIC CERAM;

ARTICLE; BIOMETRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; DRUG EFFECT; FEMALE; HUMAN; KINESIOLOGY; MALE; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; MUSCLE TONE; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCOTCHBOND;

BIOMETRY; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL MATERIALS; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; HUMANS; KINESIOLOGY, APPLIED; MALE; MATERIALS TESTING; MUSCLE TONUS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESIN CEMENTS;

EID: 33644644172     PISSN: 00220345     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/154405910508401119     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Altman D, Machin D, Bryant TN, Gardner MJ, editors (2000). Statistics with confidence. London: BMJ Books, pp. 46-48.
2. Cohen J (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbau Associates, pp. 147-150.
3. Eisenberg DM, Kessler RC, Foster C, Norlock FE, Calkins DR, Delbanco TL (1993). Unconventional medicine in the United States-prevalence, costs, and patterns of use. N Engl J Med 328:246-252.
4. Eisenberg DM, Davis RB, Ettner SL, Appel S, Wilkey S, Van Rompay M, et al. (1998). Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990-1997: results of a follow-up national survey. J Am Med Assoc 280:1569-1575.
5. Goldberg B (1999). Applied kinesiology. In: Alternative medicine. Goldberg B, editors. Tiburon, CA: Future Medicine Publishing, pp. 47-52.
6. Goodheart G (1983). Applied kinesiology in dysfunction of the temporomandibular joint. Dent Clin North Am 27:613-630.
7. Goodheart GJ (1987). Applied kinesiology and dentistry. Basal Facts 9:69-73.
8. Kenney JJ, Clemens R, Forsythe KD (1988). Applied kinesiology unreliable for assessing nutrient status. J Am Diet Assoc 88:698-704.
9. Kessler RC, Davis RB, Foster DF, Van Rompay MI, Walters EE, Wilkey SA, et al. (2001). Long-term trends in the use of complementary and alternative medical therapies in the United States. Ann Intern Med 135:262-268.
10. Lüdtke R, Kunz B, Seeber N, Ring J (2001). Test-retest-reliability and validity of the Kinesiology muscle test. Complement Ther Med 9:141-145.
11. Lygre GB, Gjerdet NR, Gronningsaeter AG, Björkman L (2003). Reporting on adverse reactions to dental materials-intraoral observations at a clinical follow-up. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 31:200-206.
12. McHugh WD (1992). Statement: effects and side-effects of dental restorative materials. Adv Dent Res 6:139-144.
13. Schissel MJ, Dodes JE (1997). Dentistry and alternative therapy. NY State Dent J 63:32-37.
14. Stanley HR (1992). Local and systemic responses to dental composites and glass ionomers. Adv Dent Res 6:55-64.
15. Teuber SS, Porch-Curren C (2003). Unproved diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to food allergy and intolerance. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 3:217-221.
16. Trampisch HJ, Windeler J (2000). Medizinische statistik. Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 266-268.
17. Walther DC (1988). Applied kinesiology synopsis. Pueblo, CO: Systems, pp. 1-28.