The impact of cGMP compliance on consumer confidence in dietary supplement products

Toxicology

Volumn 221, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 9-16

  Crowley, Richard ^a   FitzGerald, Libby Harvey ^b  

^a 206 Carnegie Center   (United States)

^b FitzGerald Consultants   (United States)

Author keywords

cGMP; Current Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP); Dietary supplements; Purity; Quality control; Regulations; Testing requirements

Indexed keywords

CONSUMER ADVOCACY; CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION; DIET SUPPLEMENTATION; EXPIRATION DATE; FOOD ANALYSIS; FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; FOOD COMPOSITION; FOOD INDUSTRY; FOOD QUALITY; FOOD SAFETY; GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE; LABORATORY TEST; LAW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; REGULATORY MECHANISM; REVIEW; SHELF LIFE;

EID: 33644640943     PISSN: 0300483X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2006.01.011     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Anon. Global nutrition industry at $ 182 billion: supplements top $ 60 billion Nutr. Bus. J. IX 10-11 2004
2. Congress of the United States, 1994. The Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994, Public Law 103-417, 108 Statute 4325. October 25, 1994.
3. Council for Responsible Nutrition, 2003. Comments on Docket No. 96N-0417, Good Manufacturing Practices for Dietary Supplements. Topic: Economic Impact of the Proposed Rule. September, 2003.
4. Council for Responsible Nutrition, 2004. American confident in dietary supplements says new IPSOS-Public affairs survey. Press Release, October 25, 2004.
5. Food and Drug Administration, 2003. Current good manufacturing practice in manufacturing, packing, or holding dietary ingredients and dietary supplements: proposed rule. Federal Register. March 13, 2003, pp. 12157-12263.