Effects of increasing load transferred in femur to the bone-implant interface

Journal of Applied Sciences

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 183-189

  Ridzwan, M I Z ^a   Shuib, Solehuddin ^a   Hassan, A Y ^a   Shokri, A A ^b  

^a SCHOOL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING   (Malaysia)

^b SCHOOL OF HEALTH SCIENCES   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Hip prosthesis; Interface; Load transfer; Stress shielding

Indexed keywords

BONE-IMPLANT INTERFACES; CEMENT/STEM INTERFACES; LOAD TRANSFER; STRESS SHIELDING;

BONE; HIP PROSTHESES; INTERFACES (MATERIALS);

SHIELDING;

EID: 33644633962     PISSN: 18125654     EISSN: 18125662     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3923/jas.2006.183.189     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Buford, A. and T. Goswami, 2004. Review of wear mechanisms in hip implants: Paper I-General. Materials and Design, 25: 385-393.
2. Keyak, J.H. and Y. Falkinstein, 2003. Comparison of in situ and in vitro CT scan-based finite element model predictions of femoral fracture load. Medical Eng. Phy., 25: 781-787.
3. Lieberman, J.R., B.J. Thomas, G.A.M. Finerman and F. Dorey, 2003. Patients' reasons for undergoing total hip arthroplasty can change over time. J. Arthroplasty, 18: 63-68.
4. Terrier, A., 1999. Adaptation of bone to mechanical stress: Theoretical model, experimental identification and orthopedic applications. Ph.D Thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology.
5. Kuiper, J.H., 1993. Numerical optimization of artificial hip joint designs. Ph.D Thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen.
6. Malchau, H., P. Herberts, P. Söderman and A. Odén, 2000. Prognosis of total hip replacement, update and validation of results from the Swedish National hip arthroplasty registry 1979-1998. Proceedings of the Scientific Exhibition Presented at the 67th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.
7. Pagnano, M.W., L.A. McLamb, R.T. and Trousdale, 2003. Primary and revision total hip arthroplasty for patients 90 years of age and older. Mayo Clinic. Proc., 78: 285-288.
8. Havelin, L.I., B. Espehaug, S.E. Vallset, L.B. Engesæter and N. Langeland, 1993. The Norwegian arthroplasty register. A survey of 17,444 total hip replacements. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 64: 245-251.
9. Malchau, H., P. Herberts and L. Ahnfelt, 1993. Prognosis of total hip replacement in Sweden. Follow-up of 92,675 operations performed 1978-1990. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 64: 97-506.
10. Huiskes, H.W.J., H. Weinans and B. van Rietbergen, 1992. The relationship between stress shielding and bone resorption around total hip stems and the effects of flexible materials. Clinic. Orthopaedics, 274: 124-134.
11. Tang, H., Y. Jiang, X.Z. Luo, S.M. Ren and H.K. Genant, 2002. Assessment of periprosthetic bone loss after total hip arthroplasty. Chinese Medical J., 115: 510-513.
12. Paul, J.P., 1999. Strength requirements for internal and external prostheses. J. Biomechanics, 32: 381-393.
13. Lozynsky, A.J., R.C. Sedlacek and D.O. O'Connor, 1996. Quantification of bone loss in the proximal femur after cemented total hip replacement using DEXA on autopsy retrieved specimens.Proceedings of American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 1996 Annual Meeting-Scientific Program, Paper No. 532.
14. McAuley, J.P., 2002. Stress shielding and clinical outcome. http:// www.slackinc.com/bone/otie/supp/1102/mcauley.asp.
15. Bagge, M., 2000. A model of bone adaptation as an optimization process. J. Biomechanics, 33: 1349-1357.
16. Terrier, A., R.L. Rakotomanana, N. Ramaniraka and P.F. Leyvraz, 1997. Non-cemented Femoral Stems Fixation: Effects of Shape Design on Bone Adaptation and on Post-Remodeling Stability, Orthopaedic Research Society. San-Fransisco.
17. Gross, S. and E.W. Abel, 2001. A finite element analysis of hollow stemmed hip prostheses as a means of reducing stress shielding of the femur. J. Biomechanics, 34: 995-1003.
18. Skallerud, B. and S.H. Pettersen, 2002. Meshing and analysis of femur and hip prosthesis. Proceedings of the 15th Nordic Seminar on Computational Mechanics, Denmark.