|
|
Volumn 116, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 513-514
|
|
Baby Doe rules have been interpreted and applied by an appellate court [3]
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
AGGRESSION;
CAREGIVER;
CHILD ABUSE;
CHILDBIRTH;
COGNITION;
COURT;
CRIMINAL LAW;
FEASIBILITY STUDY;
FETUS DEATH;
FUNDING;
GESTATION PERIOD;
HEALTH CARE POLICY;
HEALTH PRACTITIONER;
HUMAN;
LETTER;
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING;
MEDICAL ERROR;
MEDICAL LITERATURE;
MEDICAL PRACTICE;
MEDICAL SOCIETY;
PAIN;
PERSISTENT VEGETATIVE STATE;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
RESUSCITATION;
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;
SURVIVAL;
DECISION MAKING;
LEGAL ASPECT;
NEWBORN;
NOTE;
PARENT;
TREATMENT WITHDRAWAL;
UNITED STATES;
DECISION MAKING;
HUMANS;
INFANT, NEWBORN;
PARENTS;
RESUSCITATION ORDERS;
UNITED STATES;
WITHHOLDING TREATMENT;
|
|
EID: 33644632003
PISSN: 00314005
EISSN: 00314005
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2005-0798 Document Type: Letter |
|
Times cited : (6)
|
|
References (5)
|
