Orbital currents and charge density waves in a generalized Hubbard ladder

Annals of Physics

Volumn 321, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 894-933

  Fjaerestad J O ^a,b   Marston, J B ^c   Schollwock U ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^c BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33644624820     PISSN: 00034916     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.aop.2005.08.005     Document Type: Article

References (110)

1. B.I. Halperin T.M. Rice Solid State Phys. 21 1968 115
2. I. Affleck J.B. Marston Phys. Rev. B 37 1988 3774
3. J.B. Marston I. Affleck Phys. Rev. B 39 1989 11538
4. A.A. Nersesyan G.E. Vachnadze J. Low Temp. Phys. 77 1989 293
5. H.J. Schulz Phys. Rev. B 39 1989 2940
6. T.C. Hsu J.B. Marston I. Affleck Phys. Rev. B 43 1991 2866
7. S. Chakravarty R.B. Laughlin D.K. Morr C. Nayak Phys. Rev. B 63 2001 094503
8. See, e.g., P.A. Lee Physica C 408-410 2004 5
9. T. Timusk B. Statt Rep. Prog. Phys. 62 1999 61
10. 2 symmetry of its singlet order parameter; see [15].
11. (a) S. Chakravarty H.-Y. Kee C. Nayak Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 15 2001 2901
12. S. Chakravarty H.-Y. Kee C. Nayak G. Boebinger Z. Fisk L.P. Gorkov A. Lacerda J.R. Schrieffer Physical Phenomena at High Magnetic Fields vol. IV 2002 World Scientific Singapore
13. H.A. Mook P. Dai F. Doǧan Phys. Rev. B 64 2001 012502
14. H.A. Mook P. Dai S.M. Hayden A. Hiess J.W. Lynn S.-H. Lee F. Doǵan Phys. Rev. B 66 2002 144513
15. H.A. Mook P. Dai S.M. Hayden A. Hiess S.-H. Lee F. Doǵan Phys. Rev. B 69 2004 134509
16. (a) C.M. Varma Phys. Rev. B 55 1997 14554
17. C.M. Varma Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 1999 3538
18. M.E. Simon C.M. Varma Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 2002 247003
19. C. Nayak Phys. Rev. B 62 2000 4880
20. E. Cappelluti R. Zeyher Phys. Rev. B 59 1999 6475
21. D.A. Ivanov P.A. Lee X.-G. Wen Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 2000 3958
22. P.W. Leung Phys. Rev. B 62 2000 6112
23. T.D. Stanescu P. Phillips Phys. Rev. B 64 2001 220509
24. C. Nayak E. Pivovarov Phys. Rev. B 66 2002 064508
25. B. Binz D. Baeriswyl B. Douçot Eur. Phys. J. B 25 2002 69
26. A.P. Kampf A.A. Katanin Phys. Rev. B 67 2003 125104
27. C.-H. Chung H.-Y. Kee Y.B. Kim Phys. Rev. B 67 2003 224405
28. B. Normand A.M. Oleś Phys. Rev. B 70 2004 134407
29. F.F. Assaad Phys. Rev. B 71 2005 075103
30. S. Capponi C. Wu S.-C. Zhang Phys. Rev. B 70 2004 220505(R)
31. (a) E. Dagotto T.M. Rice Science 271 1996 618
32. E. Dagotto Rep. Prog. Phys. 62 1999 1525
33. M. Uehara T. Nagata J. Akimitsu H. Takahashi N. Mori K. Kinoshita J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 65 1996 2764
34. A.A. Nersesyan Phys. Lett. A 153 1991 49
35. A.A. Nersesyan A. Luther F. Kusmartsev Phys. Lett. A 176 1993 363
36. H.J. Schulz Phys. Rev. B 53 1996 R2959
37. E. Orignac T. Giamarchi Phys. Rev. B 56 1997 7167
38. D.J. Scalapino S.R. White I. Affleck Phys. Rev. B 64 2001 100506
39. K. Tsutsui D. Poilblanc S. Capponi Phys. Rev. B 65 2001 020406
40. J.O. Fjærestad J.B. Marston Phys. Rev. B 65 2002 125106
41. J.B. Marston J.O. Fjærestad A. Sudbø Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 2002 056404
42. C. Wu W.V. Liu E. Fradkin Phys. Rev. B 68 2003 115104
43. M. Tsuchiizu A. Furusaki Phys. Rev. B 66 2002 245106
44. U. Schollwöck S. Chakravarty J.O. Fjærestad J.B. Marston M. Troyer Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 2003 186401
45. T. Momoi T. Hikihara Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 2003 256405
46. T. Momoi, T. Hikihara. Available from: .
47. P. Chandra P. Coleman J.A. Mydosh V. Tripathi Nature 417 2002 831
48. H.-Y. Kee Y.B. Kim Phys. Rev. B 66 2002 012505
49. M. Vojta A. Hübsch R.M. Noack Phys. Rev. B 63 2001 045105
50. S.R. White I. Affleck D.J. Scalapino Phys. Rev. B 65 2002 165122
51. E. Orignac R. Citro Eur. Phys. J. B 33 2003 419
52. P. Schmitteckert R. Werner Phys. Rev. B 69 2004 195115
53. M. Tsuchiizu Y. Suzumura J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 73 2004 804
54. B. Gorshunov P. Haas T. Rõõm M. Dressel T. Vuletić B. Korin-Hamzić S. Tomić J. Akimitsu T. Nagata Phys. Rev. B 66 2002 060508(R)
55. G. Blumberg P. Littlewood A. Gozar B.S. Dennis N. Motoyama H. Eisaki S. Uchida Science 297 2002 584
56. T. Vuletić B. Korin-Hamzić S. Tomić B. Gorshunov P. Haas T. Rõõm M. Dressel J. Akimitsu T. Sasaki T. Nagata Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 2003 257002
57. C. Hess H. ElHaes B. Büchner U. Ammerahl M. Hücker A. Revcolevschi Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 2004 027005
58. T. Vuletić T. Ivek B. Korin-Hamzić S. Tomić B. Gorshunov P. Haas M. Dressel J. Akimitsu T. Sasaki T. Nagata Phys. Rev. B 71 2005 012508
59. P. Abbamonte G. Blumberg A. Rusydi A. Gozar P.G. Evans T. Siegrist L. Venema H. Eisaki E.D. Isaacs G.A. Sawatzky Nature 431 2004 1078
60. See, e.g., E.W. Carlson V.J. Emery S.A. Kivelson D. Orgad K.H. Bennemann J.B. Ketterson The Physics of Conventional and Unconventional Superconductors vol. II 2004 Springer
61. For a discussion of this point, see [20] and references therein.
62. L.P. Pryadko S.A. Kivelson O. Zachar Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 2004 067002
63. H.-H. Lin L. Balents M.P.A. Fisher Phys. Rev. B 58 1998 1794
64. L. Balents M.P.A. Fisher Phys. Rev. B 53 1996 12133
65. H.-H. Lin L. Balents M.P.A. Fisher Phys. Rev. B 56 1997 6569
66. H.J. Schulz G. Cuniberti P. Pieri G. Morandi P. Sodano A. Tagliacozzo V. Tognetti Field Theories for Low-Dimensional Condensed Matter Systems: Spin Systems and Strongly Correlated Electrons 2000 Springer New York
67. J. von Delft H. Schoeller Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 7 1998 225
68. A.O. Gogolin A.A. Nersesyan A.M. Tsvelik Bosonization and Strongly Correlated Systems 1998 Cambridge University Press Cambridge, MA
69. (a) D. Sénéchal. Available from: .
70. D. Sénéchal D. Sénéchal A.-M. Tremblay C. Bourbonnais Theoretical Methods for Strongly Correlated Electrons 2003 Springer Berlin
71. T. Giamarchi Quantum Physics in One Dimension 2004 Oxford University Press Oxford
72. The names D-Mott and S-Mott were introduced in [58]. Note that in [39] the D-Mott and S-Mott phase were referred to as the rung singlet and site singlet phase, respectively.
73. M. Troyer H. Tsunetsugu T.M. Rice Phys. Rev. B 53 1996 251
74. D. Scalapino S.-C. Zhang W. Hanke Phys. Rev. B 58 1998 443
75. S.R. White Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 1992 2863
76. Phys. Rev. B 48 1993 10345
77. I. Peschel X. Wang M. Kaulke K. Hallberg Density-Matrix Renormalization 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin
78. U. Schollwöck Rev. Mod. Phys. 77 2005 259
79. (a) S.-W. Tsai J.B. Marston Phys. Rev. B 62 2000 5546
80. T. Senthil J.B. Marston M.P.A. Fisher Phys. Rev. B 60 1999 4245
81. The "Mott" in the name "doped D-Mott phase" is not meant to imply that the phase that results when doping the D-Mott phase is necessarily insulating. Whether or not the various rationally doped phases are insulating is one of the central questions discussed in this paper.
82. F.D.M. Haldane Phys. Rev. Lett. 47 1981 1840
83. i〉.
84. y would be the associated momentum operator; hence the suggestive notation.
85. I. Affleck H.C. Lee Physics Geometry and Topology 1990 Plenum Press
86. 2q agrees in all cases.
87. F2 in the continuum model away from half-filling. Following previous treatments, we assume that this term is irrelevant, at least for sufficiently weak dopings.
88. c [45].
89. H.J. Schulz Phys. Rev. B 59 1999 2471
90. H.J. Schulz K.S. Bedell Z. Wang D. Meltzer A. Balatsky E. Abrahams Strongly Correlated Electronic Materials: The Los Alamos Symposium 1993 1994 Addison-Wesley
91. T. Giamarchi Physica B 230-232 1997 975
92. F = 2pi;(1 - δ) is expected to be exact. This suggests that the conclusions regarding the basic-Umklapp interaction should hold more generally. This should also include the order-of-magnitude estimate 1/δ for the length scale signifying the crossover from insulating behavior at shorter length scales to metallic behavior at longer length scales.
93. M. Yamanaka M. Oshikawa I. Affleck Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 1997 1110
94. P. Gagliardini S. Haas T.M. Rice Phys. Rev. B 58 1998 9603
95. D.N. Aristov A. Luther Phys. Rev. B 65 2002 165412
96. P.M. Chaikin T.C. Lubensky Principles of Condensed Matter Physics 1995 Cambridge University Press Cambridge, MA
97. We note that by choosing a much smaller value of the fitting parameter b in Fig. 17, the fit of the current could have been much improved, but the density oscillations in the analytical curve would have been smaller than in the numerical curve, which would not be consistent with our picture of the role of quantum fluctuations.
98. B.J. Powell, private communication.
99. E. Berger P. Valášek W. von der Linden Phys. Rev. B 52 1995 4806
100. S.A. Kivelson V.J. Emery Synth. Met. 80 1996 151
101. S. Östlund S. Rommer Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 1995 19
102. M. Fannes B. Nachtergaele R.F. Werner Comm. Math. Phys. 144 1992 3
103. A. Klümper A. Schadschneider J. Zittartz Europhys. Lett. 24 1993 293
104. D. Belitz T.R. Kirkpatrick J. Rollbühler Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 2004 155701
105. M. Pustilnik E.G. Mishchenko L.I. Glazman A.V. Andreev Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 2003 126805
106. I.A. Gruzberg, private communication.
107. C. Boullier L.P. Regnault J.E. Lorenzo H.M. Rønnow U. Ammerahl G. Dhalenne A. Revcolevschi Physica B 350 2004 40
108. J. Cardy Scaling and Renormalization in Statistical Physics 1996 Cambridge University Press Cambridge, MA
109. J.O. Fjærestad, unpublished.
110. 2.