Actuator fault distinguishability study for the DAMADICS benchmark problem

Control Engineering Practice

Volumn 14, Issue 6 SPEC. ISS., 2006, Pages 645-652

  Kościelny, Jan M ^a   Bartyś, Michał ^a   Rzepiejewski, Paweł ^a   Sá da Costa, Jose ^b  

^a WARSAW UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

^b INSTITUTO SUPERIOR TÉCNICO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Diagnostics; Fault detection and isolation; Fault distinguishability; Industrial actuators; Information system

Indexed keywords

ACTUATORS; BENCHMARKING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

ACTUATOR FAULT; FAULT DISTINGUISHABILITY; INFORMATION SYSTEM;

FAILURE ANALYSIS;

ACTUATORS; BENCHMARKING; FAILURE ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

EID: 33644624033     PISSN: 09670661     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2005.06.014     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bartyś, M. (2001). Specification of Actuators Intended to Use for Benchmark Definition. In http://diag.mchtr.pw.edu.pl/damadics/
2. Bartyś, M., & Kościelny, J. M. (2002). Application of fuzzy logic fault isolation methods for actuator diagnosis. In Proceedings of the 15th IFAC triennial world congress, b'02, Barcelona, Spain.
3. M. Basseville Information criteria for residual generation and fault detection and isolation Automatica 33 5 1997 783-803
4. M. Basseville On fault detectability and isolability European Journal of Control 7 6 2001 625-637
5. M. Blanke R.J. Patton Industrial actuator benchmark for fault detection and isolation Control Engineering Practice 3 12 1995
6. Calado, J. M. F., Carreira, F. P. N. F., Mendes, M. J. G. C., Sá da Costa, J. M. G., & Bartyś, M. (2003). Fault detection approach based on fuzzy qualitative reasoning applied to the DAMADICS benchmark problem. In Proceedings of the 5th IFAC symposium on fault detection, supervision and safety for technical processes (pp. 1179-1184). Washington, USA.
7. Calado, J. M. F., Louro, R., Mendes, M. J. G. C., Sá da Costa, J. M. G., & Kowal, M. (2003). Fault isolation based on HSFNN applied to the DAMADICS benchmark problem. In Proceedings of the 5th IFAC symposium on fault detection, supervision and safety for technical processes (pp. 1053-1058). Washington, USA.
8. J. Chen R.J. Patton Robust model based fault diagnosis for dynamic systems 1999 Kluver Akademic Publishers Boston, MA
9. P.M. Frank Fault diagnosis in dynamic systems using analytical and knowledge-based redundancy Automatica 26 1990 459-474
10. Frank, P. M. (1994). Fuzzy supervision. Application of fuzzy logic to process supervision and fault diagnosis. International workshop fuzzy technologies in automation and intelligent systems. Fuzzy Duisburg'94 (pp.36-59). Duisburg, Germany.
11. Frisk, E., Düştegör, D., Krysander, M., & Cocquempot, V. (2003). Improving fault isolability properties by structural analysis of faulty behavior models: Application to the DAMADICS benchmark problem. In Proceedings of the 5th IFAC symposium on fault detection, supervision and safety for technical processes (pp. 1209-1214). Washington, USA.
12. J. Gertler Fault detection and diagnosis in engineering systems 1998 Marcel Dekker, Inc. New York, Basel, Hong Kong
13. R. Isermann Process fault detection based on modeling and estimation. Methods-A survey Automatica 20 4 1984 387-404
14. J. Korbicz J.M. Kościelny Z. Kowalczuk W. Cholewa Fault diagnosis. Models, artificial intelligence, application 2004 Springer New York
15. Kościelny, J. M. (1999). Application of fuzzy logic fault isolation in a three-tank system. In Proceedings of the 14th world congress IFAC (pp. 73-78). Bejing, China, P-7e-05-1.
16. Kościelny, J. M., & Bartyś, M. (2000). Application of information system theory for actuator diagnosis. In Proceedings of the 4th IFAC symposium on fault detection, supervision and safety for technical process- SAFEPROCESS' 2000, Vol. 2 (pp. 949-954). Budapest, Hungary, June 14-16.
17. Lunze, J., & Supavatanakul, P. (2003). Application of timed automata to the diagnosis of the DAMADICS benchmark problem. In Proceedings of the 5th IFAC symposium on fault detection, supervision and safety for technical processes (pp. 1185-1190). Washington, USA.
18. Marciniak, A., Bocãnialã, C. D., Louro, R., Sá da Costa, J., & Korbicz, J. (2003). Pattern recognition approach to fault diagnosis in the DAMADICS benchmark flow control valve. In Proceedings of the 5th IFAC symposium on fault detection, supervision and safety for technical processes (pp. 957-962). Washington, USA.
19. Mrugalski, M., Arinton, E., & Korbicz, J. (2003). Fault detection with dynamic GMDH neural networks: Application to the DAMADICS benchmark problem. In Proceedings of the 5th IFAC symposium on fault detection, supervision and safety for technical processes (pp. 1071-1076). Washington, USA.
20. Papadimitropoulos, A., Rovithakis, G. A., & Parisini, T. (2003). Neural approximators for fault detection of actuators in the presence of friction: The case of the DAMADICS benchmark problem. In Proceedings of the 5th IFAC symposium on fault detection, supervision and safety for technical processes (pp. 1065-1070). Washington, USA.
21. Patan, K., & Parisini, T. (2002). Stochastic approaches to dynamic neural network training. Actuator diagnosis study. In Proceedings of the 15th IFAC triennial world congress, b'02. Barcelona, Spain, July 21-26.
22. R. Patton P. Frank R. Clark Fault diagnosis in dynamic systems. Theory and applications 1989 Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, New York
23. R. Patton P. Frank R. Clark Issues of fault diagnosis for dynamic systems 2000 Springer Berlin
24. Pawlak, Z. (1983). Information Systems WNT [in polish].
25. Previdi, F., & Parisini, T. (2003). Model-free actuator fault detection using a spectral estimation approach: The case of the DAMADICS benchmark problem. In Proceedings of the 5th IFAC symposium on fault detection, supervision and safety for technical processes (pp. 951-956). Washington, USA.
26. Puig, V., Quevedo, J., Stancu, A., Lunze, J., Neidig, J., Planchon, P., & Supavatanakul, P. (2003). Comparison of interval models and quantised systems in fault detection with application to the DAMADICS actuator benchmark problem. In Proceedings of the 5th IFAC symposium on fault detection, supervision and safety for technical processes (pp. 1191-1196). Washington, USA.
27. Stancu, A., Puig, V., Quevedo, J., & Patton, R. J. (2003). Passive robust fault detection using nonlinear interval observers: Application to the DAMADICS benchmark problem. In Proceedings of the 5th IFAC symposium on fault detection, supervision and safety for technical processes (pp. 1197-1202). Washington, USA.
28. Syfert, M., Bartyś, M., & Quevedo, J. (2002). Benchmark definition. In http://diag.mchtr.pw.edu.pl/damadics
29. Syfert, M., Patton, R. J., Bartyś, M., & Quevedo, J. (2003). Development and application of methods for actuator diagnosis in industrial control systems (DAMADICS): A benchmark study. In Proceedings of the 5th IFAC symposium on fault detection, supervision and safety for technical processes (pp. 939-950). Washington, USA.
30. Uppal, F. J., Patton, R. J., & Witczak, M. (2003). A hybrid neuro-fuzzy and de-coupling approach applied to the DAMADICS benchmark problem. In Proceedings of the 5th IFAC symposium on fault detection, supervision and safety for technical processes, (pp. 1059-1064). Washington, USA.
31. Vanden Daele, R., Peng Y., & Kinnaert, M. (1997). Fault diagnosis using belief functions. In Proceedings of the 3th IFAC symposium on fault detection supervision and safety for technical processes SAFEPROCESS'97 (pp. 546-551). Hul, UK.
32. Witczak, M., Patton, R. J., & Korbicz, J. (2003). Fault detection with observers and genetic programming: Application to the DAMADICS benchmark problem. In Proceedings of the 5th IFAC symposium on fault detection, supervision and safety for technical processes (pp. 1203-1208). Washington, USA.