Field and laboratory study on the deposition features of a debris flow

International Conference on Debris-Flow Hazards Mitigation: Mechanics, Prediction, and Assessment, Proceedings

Volumn 2, Issue , 2003, Pages 833-841

  Deganutti, A M ^a   Tecca, P R ^a   Genevois, R ^b   Galgaro, A ^b  

^a CNR   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Debris flow; Deposition; Flume; Rheology

Indexed keywords

CATCHMENTS; DEPOSITION; DEPOSITS; LABORATORIES; RHEOLOGY;

DEBRIS FLOW; DEPOSITION ANGLE;

DEBRIS;

EID: 33644616056     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Chau, K.T., Chan, L.C.P., Luk, S.T. & Wai, W.H. 2000. Shape of the deposition fan and runout distance of debris-flow: Effect of granular and water content. In G.F. Wieczorek & N.D. Naeser (eds), Debris-Flow Hazards Mitigation: Mechanics, Prediction, and Assessment; Proceedings 2nd International DFHM Conference, Taipei, Taiwan, August 16-18, 2000: 387-395. Rotterdam: Balkema.
2. Davies, T.R.H. 1994. Dynamically Similar small-scale debris flow models. In Proceedings International Workshop on Floods and Inundations related to Large Earth Movements, Trent, Italy, October 4-7, 1994, A: 12.1-12.11.
3. Genevois, R., Berti, M., Simoni, A. & Tecca, P.R. 1999. Debris flow monitoring and analysis in the Dolomitic Region (Upper Boite Valley, Italian Alps). In Debris flow management and risk assessment in the Alpine region, 2: 21.1-21.58.
4. Unpub. Final Report of E.U. Debris Flow Risk project (ENV4.CT96.0253).
5. Genevois, R., Tecca, P.R., Berti, M. & Simoni, A. 2000. Debris-flow in the Dolomites: Experimental data from a monitoring system. In G.F. Wieczorek & N.D. Naeser (eds), Debris-Flow Hazards Mitigation: Mechanics, Prediction, and Assessment; Proceedings 2nd International DFHM Conference, Taipei, Taiwan, August 16-18, 2000: 283-291. Rotterdam: Balkema.
6. Genevois, R., Galgaro, A. & Tecca, P.R. 2001. Image Analysis for Debris Flow Properties Estimation. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 26 (9): 623-631.
7. Iverson, R. M. 1997. The physics of debris flows. Reviews of Geophysics 35 (3): 245-296.
8. Iverson, R.M. & LaHusen, R.G. 1993. Friction in debris flows: inferences from large-scale flume experiments. Hydraulic Engineering '1993, San Francisco, CA, July 25-30, 1993 2: 1604-1609. New York: ASCE.
9. Iverson, R.M., Denlinger, R.P., LaHusen, R.G. & Logan, M. 2000. Two-phase debris flow across 3-D terrain: Model predictions and experimental tests. In G.F. Wieczorek & N.D. Naeser (eds), Debris-Flow Hazards Mitigation: Mechanics, Prediction, and Assessment; Proceedings 2nd International DFHM Conference, Taipei, Taiwan, August 16-18, 2000: 521-529. Rotterdam: Balkema.
10. Johnson, A.M. & Rodine, J.R. 1984. Debris flows. In D. Brunsden & O.P. Prior (eds), Slope Instability: 303-310. New York: Wiley and Sons.
11. Pierson, T.C. 1986. Flow behavior of channelized debris flows, Mount St. Helens, Washington. In A. D. Abrahams (ed), Hillslope Processes: 269-296. Boston: Allen and Unwin.
12. Scotton, P. & Deganutti, A.M. 1997. Phreatic line and dynamic impact in laboratory debris flow experiments. In C.L. Chen (ed.), Debris-Flow Hazards Mitigation: Mechanics, Prediction, and Assessment; Proceedings 1st International DFHM Conference, San Francisco, CA, USA, August 7-9, 1997: 777-786. New York: ASCE.
13. Suwa, H. 1988. Focusing mechanism of large boulders to a debris flow front. Transactions, Japanese geomorphological union 9 (3): 151-178.