Perceptual learning and abstraction in machine learning

Proceedings - 2nd IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics, ICCI 2003

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 18-25

  Bredeche, N ^a   Shi, Zhongzhi ^a   Zucker, J D ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF COMPUTING TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS 13   (France)

Author keywords

Animals; Artificial intelligence; Computational complexity; Computers; Humans; Information processing; Learning systems; Machine learning; Machine learning algorithms; Mobile robots

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACTING; ANIMALS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; COMPUTERS; DATA PROCESSING; INFORMATION SCIENCE; INTELLIGENT ROBOTS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; MOBILE ROBOTS;

BIOLOGICALLY INSPIRED; HUMANS; LEARNING TASKS; LIVING SYSTEMS; PERCEPTUAL LEARNING; REAL-WORLD; TRADITIONAL LEARNING;

LEARNING ALGORITHMS;

EID: 33644615175     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/COGINF.2003.1225946     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. S. Amarel. On representations of problems of reasoning about actions. Machine Intelligence, 3, 1968.
2. E. Baum. A proposal for more powerful learning algorithm. Neural Computation, 1:201-207, 1989.
3. A. Blum and P. Langley. Selection of relevant features and examples in machine learning. In Artificial Intelligence, volume 97, pages 245-271, 1997.
4. N. Bredèche, Y. Chevaleyre, J.-D. Zucker, A. Drogoul, and G. Sabah. A meta-learning approach to ground symbols from visual percepts. Elsevier's Robotics and Autonomous Systems journal, special issue on Anchoring Symbols to Sensor Data in Single and Multiple Robot Systems. S. Coradeschi and A. Saffiotti Eds. A paraitre., 2003.
5. V. Bruce and M. Burton. Learning new faces. Perceptual learning, 2002.
6. Y. Chevaleyre, N. Bredeche, and J.-D. Zucker. Learning rules from multiple instance data : Issues and algorithms. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems (IPMU02), 2002.
7. S. Coradeschi and A. Saffiotti. Anchoring symbolic object description to sensor data. problem statement. Linkping Electronic Articles in Computer and Information Science ISSN 1401-9841, 4(9), 1999.
8. S. Edelman and N. Intrator. Shift of bias for inductive concept learning. Perceptual learning, 2002.
9. M. Fahle and T. Poggio, editors. Perceptual learning. Bradford book, 2002.
10. S. E. Fahlman and C. Lebiere. The cascade-correlation learning architecture. In D. S. Touretzky, editor, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 2, pages 524-532, Denver 1989, 1990. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo.
11. I. Gent and T. Walsh. Phase transitions from real computational problems. In Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence. 356-364, 1995.
12. I. Gent and T. Walsh. The TSP phase transition. Artificial Intelligence, 88:349-358, 1996.
13. E. Gibson. Perceptual learning. Annual review of Psychology, 14:29-56, 1963.
14. A. Giordana and L. Saitta. Abstraction: a general framework for learning. In Working notes of the AAAI Workshop on Automated Generation of Approximations and Abstraction, pages 245-256, Boston, MA, 1990.
15. A. Giordana and L. Saitta. Phase transitions in relational learning. Machine Learning, 41(2):217-251, 2000.
16. F. Giunchiglia. Using abstrips abstractions : Where do we stand ? Artificial Intelligence Review, 13:201-213, 1996.
17. R. L. Goldstone. Perceptual learning. In Annual Reviews of Psychology. 49:585-612, 1998.
18. M. Herzog and M. Fahle. Top-down information and models of perceptual learning. Perceptual learning, 2002.
19. L. Hugues and A. Drogoul. Pixel-based behavior learning. In Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI'02), 2002.
20. G. John, R. Kohavi, and K. Pfleger. Irrelevant features and the subset selection problem. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machile Learning, pages 121-129, 1994.
21. R. Kohavi and G. John. The wrapper approach. In Feature Selection for Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, H. Liu and H. Motoda (eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp33-50., 1998.
22. R. Kohavi and D. Sommerfield. Feature subset selection using the wrapper method: Overfitting and dynamic search space topology. In International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 1995.
23. D. Marr. Vision. Freeman and Co., Oxford, 1982.
24. P. Nayak and A. Levy. A semantic theory of abstraction. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-95), pages 196-192, 1995.
25. S. Picault and A. Drogoul. The microbes project, an experimental approach towards open collective robotics. In Proc. of the 5th Int. Symposium on Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems. Springer-Verlag Tokyo Inc., 2000.
26. E. Sacerdoti. Planning in a hierarchy of abstraction spaces. Artificial Intelligence, 5:115-135, 1974.
27. L. Saitta and J.-D. Zucker. Semantic abstraction for concept representation and learning. In S. i. P. b. AAAI), editor, Symposium on Abstraction, Reformulation and Approximation (SARA98), Asilomar Conference Center, Pacific Grove, California, 1998.
28. L. Saitta and J.-D. Zucker. A model of abstraction in visual perception. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 15(8):761-776, 2001.
29. P. Utgoff. Machine Learning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach, volume 2, chapter Shift of bias for inductive concept learning. Morgan Kaufmann, 1986.
30. G. Wallis and H. Bulthoff. Learning to recognize objects. Perceptual learning, 2002.
31. Y. Weiss, S. Edelman, and M. Fahle. Models of perceptual learning in vernier hyperacuity. Neural Computation, 5(5):695-718, 1993.
32. J. Wnek and R. Muchalski. Hypothesis-driven constructive induction in aq17-hci - a method and experiments. Machine Learning, 14(2):139-168, 1994.
33. B. Zenger and D. Savi. Plasticity of low-level visual networks. Perceptual learning, 2002.
34. J.-D. Zucker. Changements de Reprsentation, Abstractions et Apprentissages. Mmoire d'habilitation diriger des recherches, LIP6, Universit Paris 6, 2001.
35. J.-D. Zucker and J.-G. Ganascia. Changes of representation for efficient learning in structural domains. In International Conference in Machine Learning.Bari, Italy: Morgan Kaufmann, 1996.