Activity limitation and participation restriction in adults seeking hearing aid fitting and rehabilitation

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 281-288

  Helvik, Anne Sofie ^a,b   Jacobsen, Geir ^b   Wennberg, Siri ^a   Arnesen, Haakon ^a   Ringdahl, Anders ^c   Hallberg, Lillemor R M ^c  

^a TRONDHEIM UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Activity limitation; Gender; Hearing aid; Hearing Disability and Handicap Scale (HDHS); Hearing impairment; Hospital outpatients; Participation restriction

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDIOLOGY; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CONSULTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEARING AID; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NORWAY; OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT REFERRAL; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; POPULATION RESEARCH; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SEX DIFFERENCE; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HEARING AIDS; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NORWAY; QUESTIONNAIRES; REHABILITATION OF HEARING IMPAIRED;

EID: 33644599196     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: 14645165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09638280500160311     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Ruben, RJ. Redefining the survival of the fittest: Communication disorders in the 21st century Laryngoscope, 2000; 110: 241-245
2. Heine, C, Erber, NP, Osborn, R, Browning, CJ. Communication perceptions of older adults with sensory loss and their communication partners: implications for intervention Disability and Rehabilitation, 2002; 24: 356-363
3. Noble, W. Hearing, hearing impairment, and the audible world: A theoretical essay Audiology, 1983; 22: 325-338
4. Gimsing, S. Utilization of hearing aids issued by the public health service Scandinavian Audiology, 1992; 21: 177-183
5. Dillon, H, Birtles, G, Lovegrove, R. Measuring the outcomes of a national rehabilitation program: Normative data for the Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) and the Hearing Aid User's Questionnaire (HAUQ) Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 1999; 10: 67-79
6. Kramer, SE, Kapteyn, TS, Festen, JM, Tobi, H. Factors in subjective hearing disability Audiology, 1995; 34: 311-320
7. Stephens, D, Hétu, R. Impairment, disability and handicap in audiology: Towards a consensus Audiology, 1991; 30: 185-200
8. Hétu, R, Getty, L, Philibert, L, Desilets, F, Noble, W, Stephens, D. Mise au point d'un outil clinique pour la mesure d'incapacités auditives et de handicaps The Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, 1994; 18: 83-95 [Development of a clinical tool for the measurement of the severity of hearing disabilities and handicaps] (in French)
9. Stephens, D. Hearing rehabilitation in a psychosocial framework Scandinavian Audiology, 1996; 25:
10. Hétu, R. The stigma attached to hearing impairment Scandinavian Audiology, 1996; 25: 12-24
11. WHO. International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps 1980; A manual of classification relating to the consequences of disease
12. Andersson, G, Melin, L, Lindberg, P, Scott, B. Development of a short scale for self-assessment of experiences of hearing loss: The Hearing Coping Assessment Scandinavian Audiology, 1995; 24: 147-154
13. WHO,. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health 2001
14. WHO. Towards a common language for functioning and disablement: ICIDH - 2 1998; The International Classification of Impairments, Activites, and Participation
15. Kramer, SE. Assessment of hearing disability and handicap 1998; A multidimensional approach [graad van doctor]Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit te Amsterdam
16. Hallberg, LR-M, Påsse, U, Jansson, G. Quality of life among women with noise-induced hearing loss Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 1999; 1: 21-35
17. ISO 389-1. Acoustics - reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment 1998; Part 1: Reference equivalent threshold sound pressure levels for pure tones and supra-aural earphones
18. ISO 389-3. Acoustics - reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment 1994; Part 3: Reference equivalent threshold force levels for pure tones and bone vibrators
19. ISO 8253-2. Acoustics - audiometric test methods 1992; Part 2: Sound field audiometry with pure tone and narrow-band test signals
20. Martini, A. European working group on genetics of hearing impairment infoletter 2 1996; European Commission Directorate, Biomedical and Health Research Programme (HEAR)
21. Noble, WG, Atherley, GRC. The Hearing Measurement Scale: A questionnaire for the assessment of auditory disability Journal of Auditory Research, 1970; 10: 229-250
22. Hallberg, LR-M. Evaluation of a Swedish version of the Hearing Disabilities and Handicaps Scale, based on a clinical sample of 101 men with noice-induced hearing loss Scandinavian Audiology, 1998; 27: 21-29
23. Werner, O, Campbell, DT. Translating, working through interpreters, and the problem of decentering A handbook of method in cultural anthropology, 1973; 398-420 In: Naroll R, Cohen R, (eds).
24. Bentler, RA, Kramer, SE. Guidelines for choosing a self-report outcome measure Ear & Hearing, 2000; 21: 37-49
25. Eriksson-Mangold, M, Carlsson, SG. Psychological and somatic distress in relation to perceived hearing disability, hearing handicap, and hearing measurements Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 1991; 35: 729-740
26. Karlsmose, B, Lauritzen, T, Parving, A. Prevalence of hearing impairment and subjective hearing problems in a rural Danish population aged 31-50 years British Journal of Audiology, 1999; 33: 395-402
27. Lalande, NM, Lambert, J, Riverin, L. Quantification of the psychosocial disadvantages experienced by workers in a noisy industry and their nearest relatives: Perspectives for rehabilitation Audiology, 1988; 27: 196-206
28. Mulrow, C, Aguilar, C, Endicott, J, et al,. Association between hearing impairment and the quality of life of elderly individuals Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1990; 38: 45-50
29. Jonsson, I. När hörseln sviker mitt i livet - en studie av m̈nniskors livsvillkor vid ḧrselrehabilitering Uppsala, Sweden: Habilitering och Hjälpmedel, Landstinget i Uppsala län, FOU-rapport, 2003; Report No: 22
30. Erdman, SA, Demorest, ME. Adjustment to hearing impairment II: Audiological and demographic correlates Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 1998; 41: 123-136
31. Stephens, D, Jones, G, Gianopoulos, I. The use of outcome measures to formulate intervention strategies Ear & Hearing, 2000; 21: 15-23
32. Jerger, J, Chmiel, R, Wilson, N, Luchi, R. Hearing impairment in older adults: New concepts Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1995; 43: 928-935
33. Joore, MA, Potjewijd, J, Timmerman, AA, Anteunis, LJC. Response shift in the measurement of quality of life in hearing impaired adults after hearing aid fitting Quality of Life Reasearch, 2002; 11: 299-307
34. Moum, T, Næss, S, Sørensen, T, Tambs, K, Holmen, J. Hypertension labelling, life events and psychological well-being Psychological Medicine, 1990; 20: 635-646