The legislative impact of the European Parliament under the revised co-decision procedure: Environmental, public health and consumer protection policies

European Union Politics

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 241-260

  Kasack, Christiane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Co decision; Environmental policies; European Parliament; Legislative procedures; Treaty of Amsterdam

Indexed keywords

EID: 33644597621     PISSN: 14651165     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1465116504038138     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Aspinwall, Mark D. and Gerald Schneider (2000) 'Same Menu, Separate Tables: The Institutionalist Turn in Political Science and the Study of European Integration', European Journal of Political Research 38: 1-36.
2. Crombez, Christophe (1997) 'The Co-Decision Procedure in the European Union', Legislative Studies Quarterly 12(1): 97-119.
3. Crombez, Christophe (2001) 'The Treaty of Amsterdam and the Co-Decision Procedure', in Gerald Schneider and Mark Aspinwall (eds) The Rules of Integration, pp. 101-22. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
4. Crombez, Christophe, Bernard Steunenberg and Richard Corbett (2000) 'Forum Section - Understanding the EU Legislative Process: Political Scientists' and Practitioners' Perspectives', European Union Politics 1(3): 363-81.
5. European Parliament, Delegations to the Conciliation Committee (2000) 'Activity Report 1 May 1999 to 31 July 2000', at http://www.europarl. eu.int/code/pdf/actrep2000/default_en.pdf (accessed October 2001).
6. European Parliament, Delegations to the Conciliation Committee (2001) 'Activity Report 1 August 2000 to 31 July 2001', at http://www.europarl. eu.int/code/pdf/actrep2001/default_en.pdf (accessed February 2002).
7. Hubschmid, Claudia and Peter Moser (1997) 'The Co-operation Procedure in the EU: Why Was the European Parliament Influential in the Decision on Car Emission Standards?, Journal of Common Market Studies 35: 225-42.
8. König, Thomas and Mirja Pöter (2001) 'Examining the EU Legislative Process: The Relative Importance of Agenda and Veto Power', European Union Politics 2(3): 329-51.
9. Kreppel, Amie (1999) 'What Affects the European Parliament's Legislative Influence? An Analysis of the Success of EP Amendments', Journal of Common Market Studies 37: 521-38.
10. Kreppel, Amie (2002) 'Moving Beyond Procedure: An Empirical Analysis of European Parliament Legislative Influence', Comparative Political Studies 35: 784-813.
11. Moser, Peter (1996) 'The European Parliament as a Conditional Agenda Setter: What Are the Conditions? A Critique of Tsebelis', American Political Science Review 90: 834-8.
12. Scully, Roger M. (1997) 'The European Parliament and the Co-Decision Procedure: A Rejoinder to Tsebelis and Garrett', Journal of Legislative Studies 3(3): 93-103.
13. Steunenberg, Bernard and Torsten Selck (forthcoming a) 'The Insignificance of the Significance? A Review of Procedural Models on EU Decision Making', mimeo, Leiden University.
14. Steunenberg, Bernard and Torsten Selck (forthcoming b) 'Testing Procedural Models of European Union Legislative Decision Making', chapter prepared for a monograph on EU decision-making, edited by Robert Thomson, Frans Stokman, Christopher Achen and Thomas König.
15. Tsebelis, George (1994) 'The Power of the European Parliament as a Conditional Agenda Setter', American Political Science Review 88: 128-42.
16. Tsebelis, George (1997) 'Maastricht and the Democratic Deficit', Aussenwirtschaft 52(I/II): 29-56.
17. Tsebelis, George and Geoffrey Garrett (2000) 'Legislative Politics in the European Union', European Union Politics 1(1): 9-36.
18. Tsebelis, George and Anastassios Kalandrakis (1999) 'The European Parliament and Environmental Legislation: The Case of Chemicals', European Journal of Political Research 36: 119-54.
19. Tsebelis, George, Christian B. Jensen, Anastassios Kalandrakis and Amie Kreppel (2001) 'Legislative Procedures in the European Union: An Empirical Analysis', British Journal of Political Science 31(4): 573-99.