Provenance-dependent variability of Abies grandis stem form under mountain conditions of Beskid Sa̧decki (southern Poland)

Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 35, Issue 11, 2005, Pages 2539-2552

  Socha, Jarosław ^a   Kulej, Marian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE IN KRAKOW   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PLANTS (BOTANY);

ABIES GRANDIS; CYLINDRICITY;

FORESTRY;

GROWTH;

FORESTRY; PLANTS;

ABIES; ABIES GRANDIS;

EID: 33644584337     PISSN: 00455067     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/x05-167     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Allen, P.J. 1993. Stem profile and form factor comparisons for Pinus eliotti, P. caribaea and their F1 hybrid. Aust. For. 56(2): 140-144.
2. Curt, T., Bouchaud, M., and Agrech, G. 2001. Predicting site index of Douglas-fir plantations from ecological variables in the Massif Central area of France. For. Ecol. Manage. 149: 61-74.
3. Czaplewski, R., Brown, A., and Guenther, D. 1989. Estimating merchantable tree volume in Oregon and Washington using stem profile models. USDA For. Serv. Res. Pap. RM-286.
4. Dik, E.J. 1984. Estimating the wood volume of standing trees in forestry practice. Rijksinstituut voor onderzoek in de bos en landschapsbouw de Dorschkamp, Wageningen. Uitvoerige verslagen, 19(1):1-114.
5. Dudzińska, M. 2000. Wzory empiryczne do okreslania mia̧ższości drzewostanów bukowych. Ph.D. thesis, Warsaw Agricultural University, Warsaw, Poland. [In Polish.]
6. Dudzińska, M. 2003. Model of percentage of stem section volume in the total stem volume for the mountain and the lowland beech. Sylwan, 4: 28-37.
7. Figueiredo-Filho, A., and Schaaf, L.B. 1999. Comparison between predicted volumes estimates by taper equations and actual volumes obtained by the water displacement technique (xylometer). Can. J. For. Res. 29: 451-461.
8. Foiles, M.W. 1965. Grand fir, Abies grandis (Dougl.) Lindl. In Silvics of forest trees of the United States. Compiled by H.A. Fowells. U.S. Dep. Agric. Agric. Handb. 271. pp. 19-24.
9. Forslund, R.R. 1991. The power function as a simple stem profile examination tool. Can. J. For. Res. 21: 193-198.
10. Gieruszyński, T. 1948. O kształcie strzał drzew leśnych. Sylwan, 2-4: 204-247. [In Polish.]
11. Hägglund, B. 1981. Evaluation of forest site productivity. For. Abstr. 42(11): 515-527.
12. Hunt, R.S. 1993. Abies. In Flora of North America Editorial Committee (Editors): Flora of North America north of Mexico. Vol. 2. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. pp. 354-362.
13. Husch, B., Miller, Ch., I., and Beers, T.W. 1972. Forest mensuration. John Willey & Sons, New York.
14. Kamiński, K. 1983. Wzrost i wydajność siewek jodły olbrzymiej (Abies grandis Lindl.) różnych pochodzeń w tunelach foliowych. Sylwan, 8: 11-20. [In Polish.]
15. Kleinschmit, J., Svolba, J., Rau, H.M., and Weisgerber, H. 1996. The IUFRO Abies grandis provenance experiment in Germany - results at age 18/19. Silvae Genet. 45: 311-317.
16. Konig, A. 1995 Geographic variation of Abies grandis - provenances grown in northwestern Germany. Silvae Genet. 444: 248-255.
17. Korol, M., and Gadow, K.V. 2003. Ein Einheitschaftmodell für die Baumart Fichte. Forstwiss. Centralbl. 122(3): 175-183. [In German.]
18. Kozak, A., and Smith, J.G.H. 1993. Standards for evaluating taper estimating systems. For. Chron. 69: 438-444.
19. Kulej, M. 2003. Jakość hodowlana jodły olbrzymiej w warunkach górskich Polski na przykładzie powierzchni badawczej w Leśnym Zakładzie Doświadczalnym w Krynicy. Zesz. Nauk. AR w Krakowie, 398: 75-88. [In Polish.]
20. Kulej, M., and Półtorak-Ka̧dziołka, A. 1998. Jodła olbrzymia (Abies grandis Lindl.) w warunkach gorskich Polski na przykładzie powierzchni doświadczalnej w LZD Krynica. Sylwan, 1: 39-53. [In Polish.]
21. Lindgren, D., Cheng, C., Björn, E., and Lindgren, K. 1994. Site index variation with latitude and altitude in UFRO Pinus contorta provenance experiments in western Canada and northern Sweden. Scand. J. For. Res. 9: 270-274.
22. Lines, R. 1974. A preliminary provenances trial with grand fir (Abies grandis Lindl.) Scot. For. 28(1): 85-98.
23. Lines, R. 1979. Natural variation within and between the silver firs. Scot. For. 33(2): 89-101.
24. Magnesen, S. 1996. The international grand fir (Abies grandis) provenance trial in southern Norway. Res. P. Skogf. 8: 1-15.
25. Muhairwe, C.K. 1994. Tree form and taper variation over time for interior lodgepole pine. Can. J. For. Res. 24: 1904-1913.
26. Muhairwe, C.K. 1999. Taper equations for Eucalyptus piluralis and Eucalyptus grandis for the north coast in New South Wales, Australia. For. Ecol. Manage. 113: 251-269.
27. Müller, U. 1923. Lehrbuch der Holzmekunde. Verlagsbuchhandlung Paul Parey, Dritte Auflage, Berlin. [In German.]
28. Müller, K.M. 1935. Abies grandis und ihre Klimarassen. Mitt. Dtsch. Dendrol. Ges. 44: 54-123. [In German.]
29. Müller, K.M. 1936. Abies grandis und ihre Klimarassen. Mitt. Dtsch. Dendrol. Ges. 47: 82-132. [In German.]
30. Neumann, M. 1993. Zuwachsuntersuchungen an Fichte in verschiedenen Seehöhenstufen im österreichischen Zentralalpenbereich. Osterr. Centralbl. 4: 221-274. [In German.]
31. Orzeł, S., and Socha, J. 1999. Smukłość świerka w sześćdziesiȩcioletnich drzewostanach świerkowych. Sylwan, 4: 35-43. [In Polish.]
32. Orzeł, S., Socha, J., and Ochał, W. 1999. Produkcyjność górskich drzewostanoẃ świerkowych średnich klas wieku w zalezości od ich połozenia nad poziomem morza. Sylwan, 5: 37-45. [In Polish.]
33. Øen, S., Bauger, E., and Øyen, B.H. 2001. Functionar for volumberekning av framande treslag i Vest-Norge. Aktuelt fra Skogforsk, 3(01): 18-19. [In German.]
34. Sharma, M., and Oderwald, R.G. 2001. Dimensionally compatible volume and taper equations. Can. J. For. Res. 31: 797-803.
35. Socha, J. 1998. Zalezność bonitacji drzewostanów świerkowych od wysokości położenia nad poziomem morza. Sylwan, 9: 25-32. [In Polish.]
36. Socha, J. 2002. A taper model for Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.). Electronic Journal of Polish Agricultural Universities, Forestry, Vol. 5, Issue 2. Available from http://www.ejpau.media.pl/series/volume5/issue2/ forestry/art-03.html [accessed 24 November 2004].
37. Socha, J., and Kubik, I. 2005. Model zbieżystości strzał dla górskich drzewostanów świerkowych średnich klas wieku. Sylwan, 1: 42-52. [In Polish.]
38. StatSoft, Inc. 2004. STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 6. StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, Okla.
39. Ung, Ch., P., Bernier, Y., Raulier, F, Fournier, R.A., Lambert, M., and Regniere, J. 2001 Biophysical site indices for shade tolerant and intolerant boreal species. For. Sci. 47(1): 83-95.
40. Wang, G.G., and Klinka, K. 1996. Use synoptic variables in predicting white spruce site index. For. Ecol. Manage. 80: 95-105.
41. Van Laar, A., and Akça, A. 1997. Single-tree measurements. In Forest mensuration. Cuvillier Verlag, Göttingen, Germany, pp. 82-122.
42. Walters, D.K., Hann, D.W., and Clyde, M.A. 1985. Equations and tables predicting gross total stem volumes in cubic feet for six major conifers of southwest Oregon. Cornivallis Res. Bull. 50: 1-11.
43. Walters, D.K., and Hann, D.W. 1986. Taper equations for six conifer species in southwest Oregon. Cornivallis Res. Bull. 56: 1-41.
44. Wensel, L.C., and Olson, C.M. 1995. Tree taper models for major California confiers. Hilgardia, 62(3): 1-16.