The 2002 Farm Bill commodity programs: A tool for improving rotation crop profitability and reducing risk in potato cropping systems

Applied Economics Letters

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 171-175

  Halloran, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MAINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL POLICY; COMMODITY MARKET; CROPPING PRACTICE; PROFITABILITY;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

BRASSICA NAPUS VAR. NAPUS; GLYCINE MAX; HORDEUM VULGARE SUBSP. VULGARE; SOLANUM TUBEROSUM; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 33644583367     PISSN: 13504851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13504850500393188     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Hardaker, JB and Huirine, RBM and Anderson, JR.(1997) Coping with Risk in Agriculture. NY: CAB International.
2. Just, RE and Schmitz, A.(1989) The effect of US farm programs on diversification. In Free Trade and Agricultural Diversification. (pp. 303 - 28).
3. Maynard, LJ and Harper, JK and Hoffman, LD. (1997) Impact of risk preferences on crop rotation choice Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 26, pp. 106 - 14.
4. Palisade Corporation.(2002) ®isk: Advanced Risk Analysis for Spreadsheets. Version 4.5. NY: Newfield.
5. Smith, EG and Young, DL. (2003) Cropping diversity along the US - Canada border Review of Agricultural Economics, 25, pp. 154 - 67.
6. US Department of Agriculture (various issues) National Agricultural Statistical Service. US Agricultural Statistics. Washington DC: Government Printing Office.