Translating Toulmin diagrams: Theory neutrality in argument representation

Argumentation

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 267-286

  Reed, Chris ^a   Rowe, Glenn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Argument analysis; Argument diagramming; Argument software; Computational models of argument; Toulmin diagrams

Indexed keywords

EID: 33644545716     PISSN: 0920427X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10503-005-4416-9     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Beardsley, M. C.: 1950, Practical Logic, Prentice Hall.
2. Bex, F., H. Prakken, C. Reed and D. Walton: 2003, Towards a Formal Account of Reasoning About Evidence: Argument Schemes and Generalisations', Artificial Intelligence & Law 11(2-3), 125-165.
3. Bench-Capon, T. J. M.: 1998, 'Specification and Implementation of Toulmin dialogue game', in Hage, J. C. et al. (eds.), Legal Knowledge Based Systems, pp. 5-20, GNI.
4. Bench-Capon, T. J. M.: 2003, 'Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value Based Argumentation Frameworks', Journal of Logic and Computation 13(3),429-448.
5. Chryssafidou, E., M. Sharples: 2002, 'Computer-Supported Planning of Essay Argument Structure' in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference of Argumentation, Sic Sat, Amsterdam.
6. Dung, P. M.: 1995, 'On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-Person Games', Artificial Intelligence 77(2),321-357.
7. Fox, J. and S. Das: 1996, 'A Unified Framework for Hypothetical and Practical Reasoning', in Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Formal and Applied Practical Reasoning (FAPR'96), Springer.
8. Freeman, J. B.: 1991, Dialectics and the Macrostructure of Argument, Foris.
9. Groarke, L.: 1999, 'Deductivism Within Pragma-Dialectics', Argumentation 13, 1-16.
10. Hoaglund, J.: 1999, Critical Thinking, 3rd ed., Vale Press.
11. Hitchcock, D.: 2003, 'Toulmin's Warrants' in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference of Argumentation, Sic Sat, Amsterdam.
12. Katzav, J. and C. Reed: 2004, 'On Argumentation Schemes and the Natural Classification of Arguments', Argumentation 18(2),239-259.
13. Kirschner, P. A., S. J. Buckingham-Shum and C. S. Carr: 2003, Visualizing Argument, Springer.
14. Krause, P., A. Ambler, M. Elvang-Goransson and J. Fox: 1996, 'A Logic of Argumentation for Reasoning under Uncertainty', Computational Intelligence 11(1), 113-131.
15. Parsons, T.: 1996, 'What is Argument?', Journal of Philosophy 93, 164-185.
16. Perleman, C. and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca: 1969, The New Rhetoric, Notre Dame Press.
17. Pollock, J. L.: 1995, Cognitive Carpentry, MIT Press.
18. Reed, C. and T. J. Norman: 2003, Argumentation Machines, Kluwer.
19. Reed, C. and G. W. A. Rowe: 2001, 'Araucaria: Software for Puzzles in Argument Diagramming and XML' in Department of Applied Computing, University of Dundee Technical Report.
20. Reed, C. and G. W. A. Rowe: 2004, 'Araucaria: Software for Argument Analysis, Diagramming and Representation', International Journal of AI Tools 14(3-4), 961-980.
21. Rittel, H. W. and M. M. Webber: 1973, 'Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning', Policy Sciences 4, 155-169.
22. Toulmin, S. E.: 1958, The Uses of Argument, CUP.
23. Van Gelder, T. J.: 2003, 'Enhancing Deliberation Through Computer-Supported Argument Visualization' in (Kirschner et al., 2003).
24. Verheij, B.: 2003, 'Artificial Argument Assistants for Defeasible Argumentation', Artificial Intelligence 150(1-2), 291-324.
25. Walton, D. N.: 1997, Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning, LEA.
26. Wigmore, J. H.: 1931, The Principles of Judicial Proof, 2nd ed., Little, Brown & Co.
27. Wreen, M. J.: 1998, 'A Few Remarks on the Individuation of Arguments' in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference of Argumentation, Sic Sat, Amsterdam.