Corporate compliances with the information certification provision of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

International Journal of Services and Standards

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 243-254

  Koong, Kai S ^a   Liu, Lai C ^a   Mok, Peter ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS PAN AMERICAN   (United States)

^b SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY AT NEW ORLEANS   (United States)

Author keywords

accounting standards; auditing service; information quality; misinformation systems; section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act

Indexed keywords

EID: 33644539384     PISSN: 17408849     EISSN: 17408857     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1504/IJSS.2004.005698     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bailey, J.E. and Pearson, S.W. (1983), ‘Development of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer user satisfaction’, Management Science, Vol. 29, No. 5, pp.530–545.
2. Brill, A.E. and Nimsger, K.M. (2003), ‘Data destruction: what they can’t find can get you 20 years’, Computerworld, February 5, available online: http://computerworld.com/hardwaretopics/storage/story/0,10801,78207,00.html.
3. Dilley, J.A. (2002) ‘Exposure draft’, Proposed Statements on Auditing Standards, (December 2), AICPA, New York.
4. Editors. (2003), ‘HealthSouth charged with 1.4B fraud’, available online: http://money.cnn.com/2003/03/19/news/companies/healthsouth.htm.
5. Hays, K. (2002), ‘Ex-Enron official found dead’, Amarillo Globe-News, January 26, available online: http://www.amarillonet.com/cgi-bin/printme.pl.
6. Hoffman, T. (2003), ‘deadline for Sarbanes-Oxley compliance extended’, Computerworld, May 28, Available online: http://www.computerworld.com/printthis/2003/0,4814,81579,00.html.
7. Jenkins, G.J. (2003), The Enron Collapse, Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River.
8. Koong, K.S. and Liu, L.C. (1999), ‘A factor analysis of attributes affecting computing and information technology usage for decision making in small business’, International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, Vol. 12, No. 2–5, pp.81–89.
9. O’Brien, J.A. (2002), Management Information Systems, Irwin-McGraw-Hill Publishers, New York.
10. Schroeder, M. (2003) ‘SEC clears rules limiting auditors from offering consulting services’, IEET Journal, January 23, p.C9.
11. Stroller, G. (2002) ‘Funny numbers’, USA Today, October 21, P.3B.
12. United States General Accounting Office (2003) ‘Public accounting firms: mandated study on consolidation and competition’, Report to the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs and the House Committee on Financial Services, GAO-03–864, July, Washington, DC.
13. United States Securities and Exchange Commission (2003a) ‘Commission adopts rules strengthening auditor independence’, available online: http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2003–9.htm.
14. United States Securities and Exchange Commission (2003b) ‘SEC adopts rules on provisions of Sarbanes-Oxley act’, available online: http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2003–6.htm.
15. United States Securities and Exchange Commission (2003c) ‘SEC adopts rules on retention of records relevant to audits and reviews’, available online: http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2003–11.htm.
16. United States Securities and Exchange Commission (2003d) ‘SEC implements internal control provisions of Sarbanes-Oxley act’, available online: http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2003–662.htm.
17. Whittington, R. and Fischbach, G. (2002) ‘The new audit documentation requirements’, AICPA, New York, pp.1–8, available online: http://www.aicpa.org/pubs/jofa/apr2002/whitting.htm.
18. The author names are listed in alphabetical order. All authors provided equal contributions to this research effort.