The CONTENT project: A problem-oriented, episode-based electronic patient record in primary care

Informatics in Primary Care

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 249-255

  Laux, Gunter ^a   Koerner, Thorsten ^a   Rosemann, Thomas ^a   Beyer, Martin ^b   Gilbert, Katja ^b   Szecsenyi, Joachim ^a  

^a Department of General Practice and Health Services Research ^*  (Germany)

^b GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

CONTENT; Episode of care; ICPC

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; DATA ANALYSIS; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; EPIDEMIOLOGY; EXPERIENCE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH ECONOMICS; HYPOTHESIS; INFORMATION PROCESSING; KNOWLEDGE BASE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MORBIDITY; PREVALENCE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REGISTER; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCIENTIST; SURGEON;

EID: 33644530037     PISSN: 14760320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14236/jhi.v13i4.604     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. De Lusignan S, Teasdale S, Little D et al. Comprehensive computerised primary care records are an essential component of any national health information strategy: report from an international consensus conference. Informatics in Primary Care 2004;12(4):255-64.
2. De Maeseneer JM, van Driel ML, Green LA and van Weel C. The need for research in primary care. The Lancet 2003;362:1314-19.
3. Lamberts H and Wood M (eds). ICPC. International Classification of Primary Care. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.
4. Okkes IM and Lamberts H. Classification and the domain of family practice. In: Jones R, Britten R, Culpepper L et al. (eds) Oxford Textbook of Primary Medical Care, Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004:139-53.
5. Okkes IM, Veldhuis M and Lamberts H. Severity of episodes of care assessed by family physicians and patients. The DUSOI/WONCA as an extension of the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC). Family Practice 2002;19:350-6.
6. Okkes IM, Jamoulle M, Lamberts H and Bentzen N. ICPC-2-E. The electronic version of ICPC-2: differences with the printed version and the consequences. Family Practice 2000;17:101-6.
7. World Health Organization. Manual of the International Classification of Diseases, Injuries, and Causes of Death. Tenth revision, ICD-10. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1993.
8. Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Third Edition). W3C Recommendation, 04 February 2004. www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xml-20040204
9. XML Schema Part 0: Primer Second Edition. W3C Recommendation, 28 October 2004. www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-0
10. XML Path Language (XPath)Version 1.0. W3C Recommendation, 16 November 1999. www.w3.org/TR/xpath
11. XML Path Language (XPath) Version 2.0. W3C Working Draft, 04 April 2005. www.w3.org/TR/xpath20
12. Walley T and Mantgani A. The UK General Practice Research Database. The Lancet 1997;350:1097-9.
13. Hippisley-Cox J, Stables D and Pringle M. QRESEARCH: a new general practice database for research. Informatics in Primary Care 2004;12:49-50.
14. Bartholomeeusen S, Kim CY, Mertens R, Faes C and Buntinx F. The denominator in general practice: a new approach from the Intego database. Family Practice 2005;22(4):442-7.
15. Vlug AE, van der Lei J, Mosseveld BM et al. Post-marketing surveillance based on electronic patient records: the IPCI project. Methods of Information in Medicine 1999;38(4-5):339-44.
16. Okkes IM, Groen A, Oskam SK and Lamberts H. Advantages of long observation in episode-oriented electronic patient records in family practice. Methods of Information in Medicine 2001;40(3):229-35.
17. Metsemakers JFM, Höppener P, Knottnerus JA, Kocken RJ and Limonard CBG. Computerized health information in the Netherlands: a registration network of family practices. British Journal of General Practice 1992;42: 102-6.
18. Van den Akker M, Buntinx F, Roos S and Knottnerus JA. Problems in determining occurrence rates of multi-morbidity. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2001;54(7): 675-9.