Analysis of probability density function based adaptive modulation techniques in non-cooperative communication environment

Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Communication Systems and Applications, as part of the Fifth IASTED Int. Multi-Conference on Wireless and Optical Communications, CSA 2005

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 46-51

  Su, Wei ^a   Kosinski, John A ^a  

^a US Army Research Development and Engineering Command   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptive modulation; Likelihood test; Modulation classification; Software defined radio

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; DATA COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; MODULATION;

ADAPTIVE MODULATION; LIKELIHOOD TEST; MODULATION CLASSIFICATION; SOFTWARE DEFINED RADIO;

PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION;

EID: 33644525592     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. K. Nolan, et al., Signal space based adaptive modulation for software radio. Proc. of IEEE, 2002.
2. H. Ishii, et al., Automated modulation identification for non-linear digital modulation based on software defined radio techniques. Proc. the 2003 International Symposium on Personal Indoor and mobile radio communication, 2003.
3. W. Su and J. Kosinski, A survey of digital modulation recognition methods," Proc. the 2003 International Signal Processing Conference, Dallas, TX, 2003.
4. W. Su and J. Kosinski, Comparison and modification of automated communication modulation recognition methods," Proc. MILCOM 2002, Anaheim, CA, 2003.
5. O. A. Dobre, A. Adbi, Y. BarNess, and W. Su, Blind modulation classification: A concept whose time has come. Proc. 2005 IEEE Sarnoff Symposium, Princeton, NJ, 1995.
6. Y. Huang and A. Polydoros, Likelihood methods for MPSK modulation classification. IEEE Trans. Commun., vol.43, 1493-1504.
7. J. Sills, Maximum-likelihood modulation classification for PSK/QAM. Proc. MILCOM'99, 1999, 57-61.
8. W. Wei and J. Mendel, Maximum-likelihood classification for digital amplitude-phase modulations. IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 48, 189-193.
9. L. Hongand and K. Ho, Classification of BPSK and QPSK signals with unknown signal level using the Bayes technique. Proc. IEEE ISCAS, 2003, pp. IV.1-IV.4.
10. B. Beidas and C. Weber, Higher-order correlation-based approach to modulation classification of digitally frequency-modulated signals," IEEE Journal on Sel. Areas in Commun, vol. 13, 89-101.
11. B. Beidas and C. Weber, Asynchronous classification of MFSK signals using the higher order correlation domain," IEEE Journal on Sel. Areas in Commun, vol. 46, 480-493.
12. A. El-Mahdy and N. Namazi, Classification of multiple M-ary frequency-shift keying signals over a Rayleigh fading channel," IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 50, 967-974.
13. K. Kim and A. Polydoros, Digital modulation classification: the BPSK versus QPSK case. Proc. IEEE Conf., 1988, 431-436.
14. C. Long, et al., Further results in likelihood classification of QAM signals. Proc. MILCOM '94, Oct. 1994.
15. P. Panagiotou, A. Anastasoupoulos, and A. Polydoros, Likelihood ratio tests for modulation classification. Proc. MILCOM, 2000, 670-674.
16. F. Liedtke, Computer simulation of an automatic classification procedure for digitally modulated communications signals with unknown parameters. Signal Processing, Vol 6, No. 4, 1984, 311-323.
17. Z. Hsue and S. Soliman, Automatic modulation recognition of digitally modulated signals. Proc. MILCOM '89. 1989.