Assessment of bone quality in the proximal humerus by measurement of the contralateral site: A cadaveric analyze

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

Volumn 126, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 93-100

  Diederichs, Gerd ^a,d   Korner, Jan ^a,b   Goldhahn, Jörg ^a,c   Linke, Berend ^a  

^a AO RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Switzerland)

^b JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c SCHULTHESS CLINIC   (Switzerland)

^d CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

BMD; Bone quality; Humerus fracture; Osteoporosis; Osteosynthesis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; CADAVER; CANCELLOUS BONE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DENSITOMETRY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; GENDER; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; HUMERUS FRACTURE; HUMERUS HEAD; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; METAPHYSIS; OSTEOPOROSIS; OSTEOSYNTHESIS; PREDICTION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; TREATMENT PLANNING;

ABSORPTIOMETRY, PHOTON; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BONE DENSITY; CADAVER; FEMALE; HUMANS; HUMERAL FRACTURES; HUMERUS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOPOROSIS; PROBABILITY; REFERENCE VALUES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEX FACTORS; SHOULDER FRACTURES; SHOULDER JOINT;

EID: 33644524124     PISSN: 09368051     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-006-0103-z     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Abrahamsen B, Hansen TB, Jensen LB, Hermann AP, Eiken P (1997) Site of osteodensitometry in perimenopausal women: Correlation and limits of agreement between anatomic regions. J Bone Miner Res 12:1471-1479
2. Amling M, Herden S, Posl M, Hahn M, Ritzel H, Delling G (1996) Heterogeneity of the skeleton: Comparison of the trabecular microarchitecture of the spine, the iliac crest, the femur, and the calcaneus. J Bone Miner Res 11:36-45
3. Broadbent MR, Quaba O, Hadjucka C, McQueen MM (2003) The epidemiology of multifocal upper limb fractures. Scand J Surg 92:220-223
4. Cheng XG, Lowet G, Boonen S, Nicholson PH, Van der Perre G, Dequeker J (1998) Prediction of vertebral and femoral strength in vitro by bone mineral density measured at different skeletal sites. J Bone Miner Res 13:1439-1443
5. Ciarelli MJ, Goldstein SA, Kuhn JL, Cody DD, Brown MB (1991) Evaluation of orthogonal mechanical properties and density of human trabecular bone from the major metaphyseal regions with materials testing and computed tomography. J Orthop Res 9:674-682
6. Eckstein F, Lochmüller EM, Lill CA, Kuhn V, Schneider E, Delling G, Müller R (2002) Bone strength at clinically relevant sites displays substantial heterogeneity and is best predicted from site-specific bone densitometry. J Bone Miner Res 17:162-171
7. Fankhauser F, Schippinger G, Weber K, Heinz S, Quehenberger F, Boldin C, Bratschisch G, Szyszkowitz R, Georg L, Friedrich A (2003) Cadaveric-biomechanical evaluation of bone-implant construct of proximal humerus fractures (Neer type 3). J Trauma 55:345-349. DOI 10.1097/ 01.TA.0000033139.61038.EF
8. Frankle M, Herscovici DJ, DiPasquale TG, Vasey MB, Sanders RW (2003) A comparison of open reduction and internal fixation and primary total elbow arthroplasty in the treatment of intraarticular distal humerus fractures in women older than age 65. J Orthop Trauma 17:473-480
9. Goodsitt MM, Christodoulou EG, Larson SC, Kazeroonie EA (2001) Assessment of calibration methods for estimating bone mineral densities in trauma patients with quantitative CT: An anthropomorphic phantom study. Acad Radiol 8:822-834
10. Groll O, Lochmüller EM, Bachmeier M, Willnecker J, Eckstein F (1999) Precision and intersite correlation of bone densitometry at the radius, tibia and femur with peripheral quantitative CT. Skeletal Radiol 28:696-702. DOI 10.1007/s002560050576
11. Haapamaki VV, Kiuru MJ, Koskinen SK (2004) Multidetector CT in shoulder fractures. Emerg Radiol 11:89-94. DOI 10.1007/s 10140-004-0376-x
12. Haapasalo H, Kontulainen S, Sievanen H, Kannus P, Jarvinen M, Vuori I (2000) Exercise-induced bone gain is due to enlargement in bone size without a change in volumetric bone density: A peripheral quantitative computed tomography study of the upper arms of male tennis players. Bone 27:351-357
13. Hepp P, Lill H, Bail H, Korner J, Niederhagen M, Haas NP, Josten C, Duda GN (2003) Where should implants be anchored in the humeral head? Clin Orthop 415:139-147. DOI 10.1097/01.blo.0000092968.12414.a8
14. Hertel R (2004) Fractures of the proximal humerus in osteoporotic bone. Osteoporos Int 16(Suppl 2):1-9. DOI 10.1007/s 00198-004-1714-2
15. Huopio J, Kroger H, Honkanen R, Saarikoski S, Alhava E (2000) Risk factors for perimenopausal fractures: A prospective study. Osteoporos Int 11:219-227. DOI 10.1007/s001980050284
16. Kawashima T, Uhthoff HK (1991) Pattern of bone loss of the proximal femur: A radiologic, densitometric and histomorphometric study. J Orthop Res 9:634-640
17. Koval KJ, Blair B, Takei R, Kummer FJ, Zuckerman JD (1996) Surgical neck fractures of the proximal humerus: A laboratory evaluation of ten fixation techniques. J Trauma 40:778-783
18. Kuiper JW, van Kuijk C, Grashuis JL, Ederveen AG, Schutte HE (1996) Accuracy and the influence of marrow fat on quantitative CT and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of the femoral neck in vitro. Osteoporos int 6:25-30
19. Lill H, Hepp P, Gowin W, Oestmann JW, Korner J, Haas NP, Josten C, Duda GN (2002) Age- and gender-related distribution of bone mineral density and mechanical properties of the proximal humerus. Rofo 174:1544-1550. DOI 10.1055/s-2002-35944
20. Lill H, Hepp P, Korner J, Kassi JP, Verheyden AP, Josten C, Duda GN (2003) Proximal humeral fractures: How stiff should an implant be? A comparative mechanical study with new implants in human specimens. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 123:74-81. DOI 10.1007/s00402-002-0465-9
21. Link TM, Koppers BB, Licht T, Bauer J, Lu Y, Rummeny EJ (2004) In vitro and in vivo spiral CT to determine bone mineral density: Initial experience in patients at risk for osteoporosis. Radiology 231:805-811
22. Maldonado ZM, Seebeck J, Heller MO, Brandt D, Hepp P, Lill H, Duda GN (2003) Straining of the intact and fractured proximal humerus under physiological-like loading. J Biomech 36:1865-1867 DOI 10.1016/ S0021-9290(03)00212-4
23. Mosekilde L (2000) Age-related changes in bone mass, structure, and strength - effects of loading. Z Rheumatol 59(Suppl 1):1-9
24. Nordin BE, Chatterton BE, Schultz CG, Need AG, Horowitz M (1996) Regional bone mineral density interrelationships in normal and osteoporotic postmenopausal women. J Bone MinerRes 11:849-856
25. Olschewski E, Murray P, Buckley R, Fennell C, Powell JN (2001) Assessment of osteoporosis using standard radiographs of the wrist. J Trauma 51:912-916
26. Park MC, Murthi AM, Roth NS, Blaine TA, Levine WN, Bigliani LU (2003) Two-part and three-part fractures of the proximal humerus treated with suture fixation. J Orthop Trauma 17:319-325
27. Saitoh S, Nakatsuchi Y, Latta L, Milne E (1994) Distribution of bone mineral density and bone strength of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 3:234-242
28. Seebeck J, Goldhahn J, Städele H, Messmer P, Morlock MM, Schneider E (2004) Effect of cortical thickness and cancellous bone density on the holding strength of internal fixator screws. J Orthop Res 22:1237-1242. DOI 10.1016/j.orthres.2004.04.001
29. Szyszkowitz R, Segg W, Schleifer P, Cundy PJ (1993) Proximal humeral fractures. Management techniques and expected results. Clin Orthop 292:13-25
30. Tingart MJ, Apreleva M, von Stechow D, Zurakowski D, Warner JJ (2003) The cortical thickness of the proximal humeral diaphysis predicts bone mineral density of the proximal humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85:611-617. DOI 10.1302/0301-620X.85B4.12843
31. Tingart MJ, Bouxsein ML, Zurakowski D, Warner JP, Apreleva M (2003) Three-Dimensional Distribution of Bone Density in the Proximal Humerus. Calcif Tissue Int 73:531-536
32. Wong M, Papa A, Lang T, Hodis HN, Labree L, Detrano R (2005) Validation of thoracic quantitative computed tomography as a method to measure bone mineral density. Calcif Tissue Int 76:7-10. DOI 10.1007/s00223-004-0020-5