Spectrum of congenital malformations observed in neonates of consanguineous parents;Espectro de malformaciones congénitas observadas en recién nacidos de progenitores consanguíneos

Anales de Pediatria

Volumn 64, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 5-10

  Pinto Escalante, D ^a   Castillo Zapata, I ^a   Ruiz Allec, D ^a   Ceballos Quintal, J M ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE YUCATÁN   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Congenital malformations; Consanguinity; Mexico

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOMETRY; ARTICLE; CONGENITAL MALFORMATION; CONSANGUINEOUS MARRIAGE; CONSANGUINITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; ETHNIC GROUP; FEMALE; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HISPANIC; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEXICO; NEWBORN; PREVALENCE;

EID: 33644523422     PISSN: 16954033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1157/13083826     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. a ed. México: El Manual Moderno; 2001. p. 251-8.
2. Bittles AH. A background summary of consanguineous marriage. 2001. Disponible en: www.consang.net/summary/01 AHBWeb3.pdf
3. Bittles AH. Consanguinity and its relevance to clinical genetics. Clin Genet. 2001;60:89-98.
4. Stevenson AC, Johnston HA, Stewart MI, Golding DR. Congenital malformations. A report of a study of series of consecutive births in 24 centres. Bull World Health Organ. 1966;34 Suppl:9-127.
5. Freire-Maia N. Inbreeding levels in America and Canadian populations: A comparison with latin America. Eugen Quarter. 1968;15:22-36.
6. Donbak L. Consanguinity in Kahramanmaras city, Turkey, and its medical impact. Saudi Med J. 2004;25:1991-4.
7. Khoury SA, Massad DF. Consanguinity, fertility, reproductive wastage, infant mortality and congenital malformations in Jordan. Saudi Med J. 2000;21:150-4.
8. Bromiker R, Glam-Baruch M, Gofin R, Hammerman C, Amitai Y. Association of parental consanguinity with congenital malformations among Arab newborns in Jerusalem. Clin Genet. 2004;66:63-6.
9. Schull WJ. Empirical risks in consanguineous marriages: Sex ratio, malformation and viability. Am J Hum Genet. 1958;10:294-343.
10. Frases FC, Biddle CJ. Estimating the risks for offspring of first cousing mating. An approach. Am J Hum Genet. 1976;28:522-6.
11. Liascovich R, Rittler M, Castilla EE. Consanguinity in South America: Demographic aspects. Hum Hered. 2001;51:27-34.
12. Rittler M, Liacovich R, López-Camelo J, Castilla EE. Parental consanguinity in specific types of congenital anomalies. AJMG. 2001;102:36-43.
13. Dawodu A, Al-Gazali L, Varady E, Varghese M, Nath K, Rajan V. Genetic contribution to high neonatally lethal malformation rate in the United Arab Emirates. Community Genet. 2005;8:31-4.
14. Stoll C, Alembik Y, Roth MP, Dott B. Parental consanguinity as a cause for increased incidence of births defects in a study of 238,942 consecutive births. Ann Genet. 1999;42:133-9.
15. Lasker GW. The occurrence of identical (isonymous) surnames in various relationships in pedigrees: A preliminary analysis of the relation of surname combinations to inbreeding. Am J Hum Genet. 1968;20:250-7.
16. Barrera Vásquez A, editor. Diccionario Maya Cordemex. Mérida Yucatán. México: Ediciones Cordemex; 1980.
17. Jaber L, Halpern GJ, Shohat M. The impact of consanguinity worldwide. Community Genet. 1998;1:12-7.
18. Pinto Escalante D, Ceballos Quintal JM, Solís Baeza F, Castillo Zapata I, Canto Herrera J. Coeficiente de consanguinidad de una población del estado de Yucatán. Rev Biomed. 1992;3:57-61.
19. Pinto Escalante D, Ceballos Quintal JM. Estudio comparativo de consanguinidad entre una población suburbana y una urbana de Yucatán, México. Rev Biomed. 1994;5:70-6.
20. McCullough JM, Giles E, Thompson RA. Evidence of assortative mating and selection in surnames: A case from Yucatan, Mexico. Hum Biol. 1985;57:375-86.
21. Modell B, Darr A. Genetic counseling and customary consanguineous marriage. Nature Rev. 2002;3:225-9.
22. Arcos Burgos M, Muenke M. Genetics of population isolates. Clin Genet. 2002;61:233-47.