Exploring the Link Between Preservice Teachers' Conception of Proof and the Use of Dynamic Geometry Software

School Science and Mathematics

Volumn 102, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 216-221

  Pandiscio, Eric A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MAINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33644518496     PISSN: 00366803     EISSN: 19498594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2002.tb18144.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Battista, M., & Clements, D. (1995). Geometry and proof. The Mathematics Teacher, 88(1), 48-54.
2. Bershadsky, I., & Zaslavsky, O. (1999). The effect of dragging in a dynamic geometry environment on students' strategies solving locus problems. In O. Zaslavsky (Ed.), Proceedings of the 23rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, p. 265). Haifa, Israel.
3. Crisan, C. (1999). Mathematics teachers' use of the new technology. In O. Zaslavsky (Ed.), Proceedings of the 23rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, p. 270). Haifa, Israel.
4. Eves H. (1972). A survey of geometry. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
5. Gall, M.D., Borg, W.R., & Gall, J.P. (1996). Educational research: An introduction. White Plains, NY: Longman Publishers.
6. Jackiw, N. (1995). The Geometer's Sketchpad 3. Berkeley, CA: Key Curriculum Press. Software.
7. Lakatos, I. (1976). Proofs and refutations: The logic of mathematical discovery. New York: Cambridge University Press.
8. Larson, B.E. (2000). Classroom discussion: A method of instruction and a curriculum outcome. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(5–6), 661–667.
9. Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
10. Mathison, S. (1988). Why triangulate? Educational Researcher, 17(2), 13-17.
11. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
12. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA. Author.
13. Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: CA. Sage Publications.
14. Strauss, A.L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15. Towler, A.J., Miller, L., & Kumari, D. (2000). A case study of project OWLine: Teachers' reflections. Teacher Education Quarterly, 27(1), 29-38.
16. Yin, R.K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.