A retail and lifecycle cost analysis of hybrid electric vehicles

Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 115-132

  Lipman, Timothy E ^a   Delucchi, Mark A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Hybrid electric vehicle; Lifecycle cost analysis; Manufacturing cost

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; COSTS; LIFE CYCLE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PERFORMANCE;

HYBRID ELECTRIC VEHICLE; LIFECYCLE COST ANALYSIS; MANUFACTURING COST;

ELECTRIC VEHICLES;

MANUFACTURING;

EID: 33644514364     PISSN: 13619209     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2005.10.002     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. An, F., DeCicco, J., Ross, M., 2001. Assessing the fuel economy potential of light duty vehicles. SAE paper 2001-01FTT-31, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA.
2. Burke, A.F., 1999. A method for the analysis of high power battery designs, report for the California air resources board. Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis, UCD-ITS-RR-99-6.
3. Burke, A., Abeles, E., Zhou, L., Sperling, D., Brodrick, C.J., 2002. The future of hybrid-electric ICE vehicles and fuels implications. Institute of Transportation Studies, UCD-RR-02-09, University of California, Davis.
4. CBS News, 2005. Hybrid Sales Keep Growing. Associated Press. Available from: , April 25.
5. J. DeCicco F. An M. Ross Technical Options for Improving the Fuel Economy of US Cars and Light Trucks by 2010-2015 2001 American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy Washington, DC
6. Delucchi, M.A., 2004. Summary of the nonmonetary externalities of motor-vehicle use. Report #9 in the series: The Annualized Social Cost of Motor-Vehicle Use in the United States, based on 1990-1991 Data. Institute of Transportation Studies, UCD-ITS-RR-96-3, University of California, Davis.
7. M.A. Delucchi T.E. Lipman An analysis of the retail and lifecycle cost of battery-powered electric vehicles Transportation Research D 6 2001 371-404
8. Delucchi, M.A., Burke, A.F., Lipman, T.E., Miller, M., 2001. Electric and gasoline vehicle lifecycle cost and energy-use model. Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis, UCD-ITS-RR-99-4.
9. Duesman, M., 2002. Innovative valve train systems. FEV Spectrum, Issue 19, FEV Engine Technology, Inc.
10. Energy and Environmental Analysis, Inc., 2002. Analysis and forecast of the performance and cost of conventional and electric-hybrid vehicles. Prepared for the California Energy Commission, P600-02-013CR, Sacremeto.
11. Graham, R., 2001. Comparing the benefits and impacts of hybrid electric vehicle options. Final Report, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto.
12. Greene, D.L., DeCicco, J., 2000. Engineering economic analysis of automotive fuel economy potential in the United States. Oak Ridge National Laboratory Report ORNL/TM-2000/26, Oak Ridge.
13. L.B. Lave H.L. MacLean Are hybrid vehicles worth it? IEEE Spectrum March 2001
14. Lipman, T.E., 1999a. The cost of manufacturing electric vehicle drivetrains. Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis, UCD-ITS-RR-99-7, University of California, Davis.
15. Lipman, T.E., 1999b. The cost of manufacturing electric vehicle batteries. Institute of Transportation Studies, UCD-ITS-RR-99-5, University of California, Davis.
16. Lipman, Timothy E., Delucchi, Mark, A., 2003. Retail and lifecycle cost analysis of hybrid electric vehicle designs. Institute of Transportation Studies, Davis, UCD-ITS-RR-03-01, University of California, Davis.
17. T. Markel A. Brooker T. Hendricks V. Johnson K. Kelly B. Kramer M. O'Keefe S. Sprik K. Wipke ADVISOR: A systems analysis tool for advanced vehicle modeling Journal of Power Sources 110 2002 255-266
18. National Research Council Effectiveness and Impact of Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) Standards 2002 National Academy Press Washington, DC
19. Plotkin, S., Santini, D., Vyas, A., Anderson, J., Wang, M., He, J., Bharathan, D., 2001. Hybrid vehicle technology assessment: Methodology, analytical issues, and interim results. Argonne National Laboratory Report ANL/ESD/02-2, Argonne.
20. Santini, D.J., Vyas, A.D., Moore, J., An, F., 2002a. Comparing cost estimates for US fuel economy improvements by advanced electric drive vehicles. In: EVS-19 Conference, Busan.
21. Santini, D.J., Vyas, A.D., Anderson, J.L., 2002b. Fuel economy improvement via hybridization vs. vehicle performance level. In: Future Car Congress 2002, Paper 02FCC-27, Arlington.
22. Texaco Ovonic, 2002. Nickel metal hydride batteries specification sheet. Company Literature, Texaco Ovonic Battery Systems, LLC.
23. Thomas, C.E., 1999. PNGV-class vehicle analysis: Task 3 Final Report. Directed Technologies Inc. for the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (Subcontract ACG-8-18012-01), Golden.
24. UQM Technologies, Inc., 2002. Corporate Information and Production Specifications. Available from: , July.
25. Weiss, M.A., Heywood, J.B., Drake, E.M., Schafer, A., AuYeung, F.A., 2000. On the road in 2020: A lifecycle analysis of new automobile technologies. MIT Energy Laboratory Report No. MIT EL 00-003. Energy Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.