The Virtual Solar System project: Developing conceptual understanding of astronomical concepts through building three-dimensional computational models

Journal of Science Education and Technology

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 261-275

  Keating, Thomas ^a   Barnett, Michael ^b   Barab, Sasha A ^c   Hay, Kenneth E ^d  

^a Tech Museum of Education

^b BOSTON COLLEGE   (United States)

^c INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Astronomy; Computer modeling; Conceptual change; Three dimensional models; Virtual reality

Indexed keywords

EID: 33644510882     PISSN: 10590145     EISSN: 15731839     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1016024619689     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Atwood, R. K., and Atwood, V. A. (1996). Preservice elementary teachers' conceptions of the causes of seasons. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 33: 553-563.
2. Barab, S. A., Hay, K. E., Barnett, M., and Keating, T. (2000a). Virtual solar system project: Building understanding through model building. Journal of Research and Science Teaching 37: 719-756.
3. Barab, S. A., Hay, K. E., Squire, K., Barnett, M., Schmidt, R., Karrigan, K., and Johnson, C. (2000b). Virtual solar system project: Developing scientific understanding through model building. Journal of Science Education and Technology 9: 7-26.
4. Barnett, M., Barab, S. A., and Hay, K. E. (2001a). The virtual solar system project: Student modeling of the solar system. The Journal of College Science Teaching 30: 300-305.
5. Barnett, M., MaKinster, J. G., and Hansen, J. (2001b). Exploring elementary students' learning of astronomy through model building. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association, April, Seattle, WA.
6. Barnett, M., and Morran, J. (in press). Addressing children's' understanding of the Moon's phases and eclipses. International Journal of Science Education.
7. Bednar, A. K., Cunningham, D., Duffy, T. M., and Perry, D. J. (1992). Theory into practice: How do we link? In Duffy, T., and Jonassen, D. (Eds.), Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 17-34.
8. Blumenfeld, P., Soloway, E., Marx, R., Krajcik, J., Guzdial, M., and Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist 26: 369-398.
9. Comins, N. F. (1993). Sources of misconceptions in astronomy. In Novak, J. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics [distributed electronically], Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
10. Copolo, C. F., and Hounsell, P. B. (1995). Using three-dimensional models to teach molecular structures in high school chemistry. Journal of Science Education and Technology 4: 295-305.
11. Demastes, S. S., Good, R. G., and Peebles, P. (1995). Students' conceptual ecologies and the process of conceptual change in evolution. Science Education 79: 637-666.
12. diSessa, A., and Minstrell, J. (1998). Cultivating conceptual change with benchmark lessons. In Greeno, J., and Goldman, S. (Eds.), Thinking Practices in Mathematics and Science Learning, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 155-187.
13. Edelson, D., Gordin, D., and Pea, R. (1999). Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 8: 391-450.
14. Gotwals, R. R. (1995). Scientific visualization in chemistry, better living through chemistry, better chemistry through pictures: Scientific visualization for secondary chemistry students. In Thomas, D. A. (Ed.), Scientific Visualization in Mathematics and Science Teaching, AACE, Charlottesville, pp. 153-179.
15. Hay, K., Crozier, J., and Barnett, M. (2000a,). Virtual gorilla modeling project: Middle school students constructing virtual models for learning. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April, New Orleans, LA.
16. Hay, K. E., Marlino, M., and Holschuh, D. R. (2000b). The virtual exploratorium: Foundational research and theory on the integration of 5-D modeling and visualization in undergraduate geocscience education. In Fishman, B., and O'Connor-Divelbiss, S. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 214-220.
17. Khoo, G., and Koh, T. (1998). Using visualization and simulation tools in tertiary science education. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching 17: 5-20.
18. Kozma, R. (1999). Students collaborating with computer models and physical experiments. In Hoadley, C., and Roschelle, J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 1999 Conference [On-line], Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. Retrieved from http://kn.cilt.org/cscl99/
19. Lehrer, R., Horvath, J., and Schauble, L. (1994). Developing model-based reasoning. Interactive Learning Environments 4: 219-231.
20. Muthukrishna, N., Carnine, D., Grossen, B., and Miller, S. (1993). Children's alternative frameworks: Should they be directly addressed in science education? Journal of Research in Science Teaching 30: 233-248.
21. Parker, J., and Heywood, D. (1998). The Earth and beyond: Developing primary teachers' understanding of basic astronomical events. International Journal of Science Education 20: 503-520.
22. Penner, D E., Lehrer, R., and Schauble, L. (1998). From physical models to biomechanics: A design-based modeling approach. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 7: 429-449.
23. Pfundt, H., and Duit, R. (1998). Students' Alternative Frameworks and Science Education, 5th Bibliography, Institute for Science Education, Kiel University, West Germany.
24. Posner, G., Strike, K., Hewson, P., and Gertzog, W. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Towards a theory of conceptual change. Science Education 66: 221-227.
25. Pyramid Film and Video (1988). A Private Universe [Film], An Insightful Lesson on How We Learn, Pyramid Film & Video, Santa Monica, CA.
26. Sabelli, N. (1994). On using technology for understandings science. Interactive Learning Environments 4: 195-198.
27. Sadler, P (1996). Astronomys conceptual hierarchy. In Percy, J. (Ed.), Astronomy Education: Current Developments, Future Coordination. Astronomical Society of the Pacific. San Francisco, CA, pp. 26-34.
28. Schoon, K. J. (1993). The origin of Earth and space science misconceptions: A survey of pre-service elementary teachers. In Novak, J. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Third International Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics [distributed electronically], Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
29. Simpson, W. D., and Marek, E. A. (1988). Understandings and misconceptions of biology concepts held by students attending small high schools and students attending large high schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 25: 361-374.
30. Sneider, C., and Ohadi, M. (1998). Unraveling students' misconceptions about the Earth's shape and gravity. Science Education 82: 265-284.
31. Stratford, S. J. (1997). A review of computer-based research in precollege science classrooms. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching 16: 3-23.
32. Stratford, S. J., Krajcik, J., and Soloway, E. (1998). Secondary students' dynamic modeling processes: Analyzing, reasoning about, synthesizing, and testing models of stream ecosystems. Journal of Science Education and Technology 7: 215-234.
33. Strike, K. A., and Posner, G. J. (1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In Duschl, R. A., and Hamilton, R. J. (Eds.), Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Psychology, and Educational Theory and Practice, State University of New York Press, New York, pp. 147-176.
34. Treagust, D., and Smith, C. L. (1989). Secondary students' understanding of gravity and the motion of planets. School Science and Mathematics 89: 380-391.
35. Vosniadou, S. (1991). Designing curricula for conceptual restructuring: Lessons from the study of knowledge acquisition in astronomy. Journal of Curriculum Studies 23: 219-237.
36. Walkerdine, V. (1997). Redefining the subject in situated cognition theory. In Kirshner, D., and Whitson, J. A. (Eds.), Situated Cognition: Social, Semiotic, and Psychological Perspectives, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 57-70.
37. Wandersee, J. H., Mintzes, J. J., and Novak, J. D. (1994). Research on alternative conceptions in science. In Gabel, D. L. (Ed.), Handbook on Science Teaching and Learning, Macmillan, New York, pp. 177-210.
38. White, B. Y., and Frederikson, J. R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction 16: 3-118.
39. Windschitl, M., Winn, W., and Headley, N. (2001). Using immersive visualizations to promote the understanding of complex natural systems: Learning inside virtual Puget Sound. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research on Science Teaching.
40. Winn, W., and Windschitl, M. (in press). Learning in artificial environments. Artificial Environments.