Assessment of soil-based and calibrated parameters of the Sacramento model and parameter transferability

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 320, Issue 1-2, 2006, Pages 117-131

  Gan, Thian Yew ^a   Burges, Stephen J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b University of Washington   (United States)

Author keywords

Calibrated (CAB) and Soil based (SoiB) parameters; Euclidean distance; Hydrologic similarity; MOPEX (Model Parameter Estimation Experiment); Parameter transferability; Sacramento rainfall runoff model (SAC SMA)

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; CALIBRATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SOILS;

CALIBRATED (CAB) AND SOIL-BASED (SOIB) PARAMETERS; EUCLIDEAN DISTANCE; HYDROLOGIC SIMILARITY; MOPEX (MODEL PARAMETER ESTIMATION EXPERIMENT); PARAMETER TRANSFERABILITY; SACRAMENTO RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODEL (SAC-SMA);

HYDROLOGY;

ALGORITHMS; CALIBRATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING; HYDROLOGY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SOILS;

CALIBRATION; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; PARAMETERIZATION; RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING;

EID: 33644502597     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.008     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Aldenderfer, M.S, Blashfield, R.K., 1984. Cluster Analysis, Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in Social Sciences, # 07-044, Beverly Hills, Sage.
2. Burges, S.J., 2003. Process Representation, Measurements, Data Quality, and Criteria for Parameter Estimation of Watershed Models, pp 283-299, in Q. Duan, H. Gupta, S. Sorooshian, A.N. Rousseau, R. Turcotte Eds., Calibration of Watershed Models, AGU Monograph, Water Science and Application 6.
3. Dooge, J.C.I., 1986. Looking for hydrologic laws, Water Resources Research, 22(9), 46s-58s.
4. Q. Duan, S. Sorooshian, and V.K. Gupta Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall runoff models Water Resources Research 28 4 1992 1015 1031
5. Duan, Q., Schaake, J., Koren, V., 2001. A Priori estimation of land surface model parameters, in Land Surface hydrology, Meteorology, and Climate, Observations and Modeling, Water Science and Application 3, edited by Lakshmi, V., Albertson, J., Schaake, J., AGU, Washington DC, p. 77-94.
6. Duan, Q., Schaake, J., Andreassian, V., Franks, S., Gupta, H.V., Gusev, Y.M., Habets, F., Hall, A., Hay, L., Hogue, T., Huang, M., Leavesley, G., Liang, X., Nasonova, O.N., Noilhan, J., Oudin, L., Sorooshian, S., Wagener, T., Wood, E.F., 2005. Model parameter estimation experiment (MOPEX): overview and summary of the second and third workshop results, MOPEX Special Issue, J. of Hydrology, in press.
7. C.E. Duchon, and G.R. Essenberg Comparative rainfall observations from pit and aboveground rain gauges with and without wind shields Water Resources Research 37 12 2001 3253 3263
8. T.Y. Gan, and S.J. Burges An assessment of a conceptual rainfall-runoff model's ability to represent the dynamics of small hypothetical catchments 1: models, model properties, and experimental design, Water Resources Research 26 7 1990 1595 1604
9. T.Y. Gan, and S.J. Burges An assessment of a conceptual rainfall-runoff model's ability to represent the dynamics of small hypothetical catchments 2: hydrologic responses for normal and extreme rainfall, Water Resources Research 26 7 1990 1605 1619
10. James, L.D., Burges, S.J., 1982. Selection, calibration, and testing of hydrologic models, in Hydrologic Modeling of Small Watersheds, edited by C.T. Haan, H.P. Johnson, D.L. Brakensiek, American Society of Agricultural Engineers Monograph, 5, 437-472.
11. T.Y. Gan, and G.F. Biftu Automatic calibration of conceptual rainfall-runoff models: optimization algorithms, catchment conditions, and model structure, Water Resources Research, American Geophysics Union, Dec. 32 12 1996 3513 3524
12. Gan, T.Y., Dlamini, E.M., Biftu, G.F., 1997. Hydrologic modeling of dry catchments-model complexity and model structure, calibration data, and objective functions, Journal of Hydrology, 192, 81-103, Elsevier Science.
13. Gutman, A., Iganatov, A., 1998. The derivation of the green vegetation fraction from NOAA/AVHRR data for use in numerical weather prediction models, Int. J. Remote Sensing, 19(8), 1,533-1,543.
14. Hartigan, J.A., 1975. Clustering Algorithms, John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York.
15. J.A. Hartigan Statistical theory in clustering Journal of Classification 2 1985 63 76
16. Koren, V., Smith, M., Duan, Q., 2003. Use of a priori parameter estimates in the derivation of spatially consistent parameter sets of rainfall-runoff models, Calibration of Watershed Models, Water Science and Application, Volume 6, 239-254, AGU.
17. Koren, V.I., Smith, M., Wang, D., Zhang, Z., 2000. Use of soil property data in the derivation of conceptual rainfall-runoff model parameters, Preprints, 15th Conference on Hydrology, Long Beach, CA, Amer. Meteor. Soc. 10-14, 103-106.
18. Leavesley, G.H., Hay, L.E., Viger, R.J., Markstrom, S.L., 2003. Use of a priori parameter-estimation methods to constrain calibration of distributed-parameter models, Calibration of Watershed Models, Water Science and Application, Volume 6, 255-266, AGU.
19. S.V.D. Linden, and M. Woo Transferability of hydrological model parameters between basins in data-sparse areas, sub-Arctic Canada, Journal of Hydrology 270 2003 182 194
20. G.E. Liston, C. Y, and E.F. Sud Wood,, Evaluating GCM land surface hydrology parameterizations by computing river discharge using a runoff routing model: Application to the Mississippi River basin, J. of Applied Meteo. 33 3 1994 394 404
21. Sivapalan, M., 2003. IAHS decade on predictions in ungauged basins (PUB), 2003-2012: shaping an exciting future for the hydrological sciences, Hydrol. Sci. J., 48(6), 857-880.