A comparison of subjective video quality assessment methods for low-bit rate and low-resolution video

Proceedings of the Seventh IASTED International Conference on Signal and Image Processing, SIP 2005

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 70-76

  Huynh Thu, Quan ^a,b   Ghanbari, Mohammed ^b  

^a Psytechnics Ltd   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Perceptual quality; Subjective assessment; Video services

Indexed keywords

IMAGE CODING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTICAL RESOLVING POWER; TELEVISION BROADCASTING; VIDEO SIGNAL PROCESSING;

PERCEPTUAL QUALITY; SUBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT; VIDEO SERVICES;

IMAGE QUALITY;

EID: 33644500749     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (7)

1. International Telecommunication Union, Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures, ITU-R Recommendation BT.500-11, 2002.
2. International Telecommunication Union, Subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications, ITU-T Recommendation P.910, September 1999.
3. A. Webster et al., Final report from the Video Quality Experts Group on FRTV Phase II test validation of objective models of video quality assessment, ITU-T Contribution COM9-C60, August 2003.
4. International Telecommunication Union, Objective perceptual video quality measurement techniques for digital cable television in the presence of a full reference, ITU-T Recommendation J.144, March 2004.
5. International Telecommunication Union, Video coding for low bit rate communication, ITU-T Recommendation H.263, February 1998 (to be republished in January 2005).
6. International Organization for Standardization, Coding of audio-visual objects - Part 2: Visual, ISO/IEC 14496-2, 2004.
7. th IEE Int. Conf. on Mobile Communication Technologies, London, October 2004.