-
1
-
-
11844273878
-
A systematic review finds that diagnostic reviews fail to incorporate quality despite available tools
-
Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Dinnes J, et al. A systematic review finds that diagnostic reviews fail to incorporate quality despite available tools. J Clin Epidemiol 2005;58:1-12.
-
(2005)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.58
, pp. 1-12
-
-
Whiting, P.1
Rutjes, A.W.2
Dinnes, J.3
-
2
-
-
0037232979
-
The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: Explanation and elaboration
-
Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Clin Chem 2003;49:7-18.
-
(2003)
Clin Chem
, vol.49
, pp. 7-18
-
-
Bossuyt, P.M.1
Reitsma, J.B.2
Bruns, D.E.3
-
3
-
-
2942700307
-
The development of QUADAS: A tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews
-
Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, et al. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2003;3:25.
-
(2003)
BMC Med Res Methodol
, vol.3
, pp. 25
-
-
Whiting, P.1
Rutjes, A.W.2
Reitsma, J.B.3
-
4
-
-
33644515964
-
Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies
-
Rutjes AWS, Reitsma JB, Di Nisio M, et al. Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies. CMAJ 2006;174(4):469-76.
-
(2006)
CMAJ
, vol.174
, Issue.4
, pp. 469-476
-
-
Rutjes, A.W.S.1
Reitsma, J.B.2
Di Nisio, M.3
-
5
-
-
0033568729
-
Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests
-
Lijmer JG, Mol BW, Heisterkamp S, et al. Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests. JAMA 1999;282:1061-6.
-
(1999)
JAMA
, vol.282
, pp. 1061-1066
-
-
Lijmer, J.G.1
Mol, B.W.2
Heisterkamp, S.3
-
6
-
-
0742318857
-
Sources of variation and bias in studies of diagnostic accuracy: A systematic review
-
Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, et al. Sources of variation and bias in studies of diagnostic accuracy: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2004;140:189-202.
-
(2004)
Ann Intern Med
, vol.140
, pp. 189-202
-
-
Whiting, P.1
Rutjes, A.W.2
Reitsma, J.B.3
-
7
-
-
0030897927
-
A nationwide survey of observer variation in the diagnosis of thin cutaneous malignant melanoma including the MIN terminology
-
CRC Melanoma Pathology Panel
-
A nationwide survey of observer variation in the diagnosis of thin cutaneous malignant melanoma including the MIN terminology. CRC Melanoma Pathology Panel. J Clin Pathol 1997;50:202-5.
-
(1997)
J Clin Pathol
, vol.50
, pp. 202-205
-
-
-
8
-
-
0346598181
-
Clinical prediction rules
-
Guyatt G, Rennie D, editors. Chicago: AMA Press
-
McGinn T, Guyatt G, Wyer P, et al. Clinical prediction rules. In: Guyatt G, Rennie D, editors. Users' guides to the medical literature: a manual for evidence-based clinical practice. Chicago: AMA Press; 2002.
-
(2002)
Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: A Manual for Evidence-Based Clinical Practice
-
-
McGinn, T.1
Guyatt, G.2
Wyer, P.3
|