Collaborating on evaluation for youth development

New Directions for Evaluation

Volumn 2003, Issue 98, 2003, Pages 47-59

  Lau, Genevieve ^b   Netherland, Nancy H ^c   Haywood, Mary L ^a  

^a Skyline College ^*

^b Skyline College   (United States)

^c Forward Progress Consulting   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33444454938     PISSN: 10976736     EISSN: 1534875X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ev.84     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Alkin, M. C., “Evaluation Theory Development: II.” In M. W.McLaughlin and D. C.Philips (eds.), Evaluation and Education: At Quarter Century. The 90th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, part II. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991, pp. 91-112.
2. Bernard, B., “Resiliency Requires Changing Hearts and Minds.” Western Center News, 1993, 6(2), 4-5.
3. Bernard, B., “Research Support for Resiliency-Based Prevention.“Berkeley, Calif.: Resiliency Associates, 1997.
4. Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development. A Matter of Time: Risk and Opportunity in the Non-School Hours. New York: Task Force on Youth Development and Community Programs, Carnegie Corporation, 1992.
5. Chen, H. T., Theory-Driven Evaluations. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage, 1990.
6. Connell, J. P., The Youth Development Framework. Institute for Research and Reform in Education. San Francisco: Community Network for Youth Development, 1997.
7. Connell, J. P., Kubisch, A., Schorr, L., and Weiss, C. (eds.). Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatives: Concepts, Methods, and Contexts. Roundtable on Comprehensive Community Initiatives for Children and Families. Washington, D.C.: Aspen Institute, 1995.
8. Cousins, J. B., and Earl, L. M., “The Case for Participatory Evaluation.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1992, 14(4), 397-414.
9. Cross, P. K., “Education Reform in Wonderland: Implementing Education Reform.” Phi Delta Kappan, 1987, 65(7), 447-452.
10. Fetterman, D., Kaftarian, S. J., and Wandersman, A. (eds.). Empowerment Evaluation: Knowledge and Tools for Self-Assessment and Accountability. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1997.
11. Florio-Ruane, S., “The Written Literacy Forum: An Analysis of Teacher Researcher Collaboration.” Journal of Curriculum Studies, 1990, 22(4), 313-328.
12. Lau, G., and LeMahieu, P., “Changing Roles: Evaluator and Teacher Collaborating in School Change.” Evaluation and Program Planning, 1997, 20(1), 7-15.
13. Lipsey, M. W., “Theory as Method: Small Theories of Treatments.” In L. B.Sechrest and A. G.Scott (eds.), Understanding Causes and Generalizing About Them. New Directions for Program Evaluation, no. 57. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1993.
14. Livingston, C., and Castle, S., “Teachers Using Research: What Does It Mean?“In C.Livingston and S.Castle (eds.), Teachers and Research in Action. Washington, D.C.: National Education Association, 1989, pp. 13-28.
15. Lofquist, W., “Let’s Create a New Culture of Youth Work in America.” New Designs for Youth Development, Winter1992, pp. 23-27.
16. McKnight, J., “Mapping Community Capacity.” New Designs For Youth Development, Winter1992, pp. 9-15.
17. McLaughlin, M. W., Irby, M. A., and Langman, J., Urban Sanctuaries: Neighborhood Organizations in the Lives and Futures of Inner-City Youth. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1994.
18. Nathan, J., “Toward Educational Change and Economic Justice: An Interview With Herbert Kohl.” Phi Delta Kappan, 1991, 72(9), 678-681.
19. Patton, M. Q., Utilization-Focused Evaluation: The New Century Text. (3rd ed.) Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage, 1997.
20. Patton, M. Q., “Discovering Process Use.” Evaluation, 1998, 4(2), 225-233.
21. Pittman, K. J., and Cahill, M., A New Vision: Promoting Youth Development. Washington, D.C.: Center for Youth Development and Policy Research, Academy for Educational Development, 1991.
22. Pittman, K. J., and Wright, M., Bridging the Gap: A Rationale for Enhancing the Role of Community Organizations in Promoting Youth Development. New York: Task Force on Youth Development and Community Programs, Carnegie Corporation, 1991.
23. Pittman, K. J., and Zeldin, S., Evaluating Youth Development in Programs and Communities: The Need for an Integrated Framework and Collaborative Strategy. Washington, D.C.: Center for Youth Development and Policy Research, Academy for Educational Development, 1992.
24. Shadish, W. R. Jr., “Program Micro- and Macro Theories: A Guide for Social Change.” In L.Bickman (ed.), Using Program Theory in Evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, no. 33. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1987.
25. Shulha, L. M., and Cousins, J. B., “Evaluation Use: Theory, Research, and Practice Since 1986.” Evaluation Practice, 1997, 18(3), 195-208.
26. Weiss, C. H., Evaluation Research: Methods of Assessing Program Effectiveness. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1972.
27. Wiggins, G., “A True Test: Toward More Authentic and Equitable Assessment.” Phi Delta Kappan, 1989, 70(9), 703-713.