Knowledge-based design of graphical responses

International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Proceedings IUI

Volumn Part F127502, Issue , 1993, Pages 29-36

  Chappel, Helen ^a   Wilson, Michael ^a  

^a RUTHERFORD APPLETON LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Articulate graphics; Automatic graphic presentation; Intelligent interfaces; User modelling

Indexed keywords

KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS;

ARTICULATE GRAPHICS; GRAPHIC PRESENTATION; GRAPHICAL DESIGNS; INTELLIGENT INTERFACE; KNOWLEDGE BASED DESIGN; NATURAL LANGUAGES; SUPPORTING KNOWLEDGE; USER MODELLING;

USER INTERFACES;

EID: 3343022135     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/169891.169895     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Bertin, J. Semiology of Graphics. (Translated by WJ.Berg). University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin, 1983.
2. Binot, JL., Debille, L., Sedlock, D., Vandecappelle, B., Chappel, H. and Wilson, M.D. Multimodal Integration in MMI2: Anaphora Resolution & Mode Selection. In Proceedings of the Work With Display Units Conference (Berlin, September, 1992). Elsevier, Amsterdam
3. Cahour, B. Pragmatic Modelling in consultation dialogues. In Proceedings of the Work with Display Units Second Conference, (Montreal, 11-14 Sept). Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1989.
4. Chappel, H.R. and Wilson, M.D. The Graphical Presentation of Structured Representations. Deliverable d38 from the ESPRIT II project MMI2 (p2474), 1991.
5. Chappel, H., Wilson, M. and Cahour, B. Engineering User Models to Enhance Multi-Modal Dialogue. In C.A. Unger and J.A. Larson (Eds.) Proceedings of the IFIP TC2WG2.7 Working Conference on Engineering for Human-Computer Interaction, (Ellivuori, Finland 10-14 August), Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 1992.
6. Cleveland, W.S. and McGill, R. Graphical Perception: Theory, experimentation and application to the development of graphical methods. Journal of American Statistical Association 79, 387, (Sept 1984), 531-554.
7. Cleveland, W.S. The Elements of Graphing Data. : Wadsworth Advanced Books and Software, Monterey, California, 1985.
8. du Toit, S.H.C, Steyn, A.G.W, and Stumpf, R.H. Graphical Exploratory Data Analysis. Springer Verlag, New York, 1986.
9. Feiner, S. & McKeown, K. Automating the generation of coordinated multimedia explanations, IEEE Compu-ter, 24(10), 33-41, 1991.
10. Feiner, Mackinlay & Marks, Automating the design of effective graphics for intelligent user inteifaces. Tutorial Notes 30, presented at CHI '92, (Monterey, Calif. May 1992).
11. Gargan, R., Sullivan, J.W. and Tyler, S.W., Multimodal Response Planning: An Adaptive Rule Based Approach. In Proceedings of CHI'88, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1988, pp229-235.
12. Gerstendorfer, M. and Rohr, G. Which task in which representation on what kind of interface. In HJ. Bullinger and B. Shackel (Eds.) Human Computer Interaction - INTERACT '87, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 1987, pp513-518.
13. GriceH.P. Logic and Conversation. In P. Cole and J.L Morgan (eds.) Syntax and Semantics Vol 3, Academic Press, New York, 1975.
14. Hitt, W.D, Schutz, H.G., Christner, CA., Ray, H.W. and Coffey, L.J. Development of Design Criteria for Intelligence Display Formats. Human Factors (July 1961), 86-119.
15. Jarvenpaa, S.L. and Dickson, G.W. Graphics and Managerial Decision Making: Research Based Guidelines. Communciations of the ACM 31, 6, (1988) 764-774.
16. Laurel, B. Issues in Multimedia Interface Design: Media Integration and Interface Agents. In J.C. Chew and J. Whiteside (Eds.) CHI '90 Conference Proceedings. ACM, New York, 1990, pp.133-140.
17. Mackinlay, J.D. Automating the design of graphical presentations of relational information. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 5, 2, (1986) 110-141.
18. Reynolds, L. and Simmonds, D. Presentation of data in Science. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague/Boston/London, 1982.
19. Reiter, E. and Marks, J. Avoiding Unwanted Conversational Implicatures in Text and Graphics. In Proceedings ofAAAI-90, (Boston MA, July 1990) AAAI Press, Menlo Park CA.
20. Remus, W. An empirical investigraion of the impact of graphical and tabular data presenations on decision making. Management Science 30, 5, (1984) 533-542.
21. Roth, S.F. and Mattis, J. Data characterization for intelligent graphics presentation. In Proceedings of the CHf-90 Conference on Human Factor in Computing Systems. (Seattle, WA, 1990), ACM, New York.
22. Sanders, J. Smarter not faster, PC Magazine, (April, 1992) pg 29.
23. Schmid, CF. and Schmid, S.E. Handbook of Graphic Presentation. 2nd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1978.
24. Tufte, E. The visual display of quantitative information. Graphics Press, Cheshire, Connecticut, 1983.
25. Tukey, J.W. Exploratory Data Analysis. Addison-Wes-ley, Reading, Mass., 1977.
26. Wainer, H. Making newspaper graphs fit to print. In Proceedings of Visible Language, (Eindhoven, 4-8th September 1977), 1979.
27. Washburne, J.N. An Experimental Study of various Graphic, Tabular and Textural Methods of Presenting Quantitative Material. Journal of Educational Psychology 18, 6, (1927) 361-376.
28. Wilcox, W. Numbers and the News: Graph, Table or Text. Journalism Quarterly 41, 1 (Winter, 1964), 38-44.
29. Wilson, M.D., D. Sedlock, J-L. Binot, Falzon, P., An Architecture For Multimodal Dialogue. In M.M. Taylor, F. Neel & D.G. Bouwhuis (Eds.) Proceedings of the Second Venaco Workshop on Multi-Modal Dialogue, (Acquafredda di Maratea, Italy, September, 1991), ISSN 1018-4554.
30. Wright, P. Presenting technical information: a survey of research findings. Instructional Science 6, (1977) 93-134.
31. Wright, P. and Fox, K. Presenting information in tables. Applied Ergonomics 1, (1970) 134-242.