Loss-adjusted survival of cervix cancer in Khon Kaen, Northeast Thailand

British Journal of Cancer

Volumn 91, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 106-110

  Sriamporn, S ^a   Swaminathan, R ^b   Parkin, D M ^c   Kamsa ard, S ^a   Hakama, M ^d  

^a KHON KAEN UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

^b CANCER INSTITUTE WIA   (India)

^c INTERNATIONAL AGENCY FOR RESEARCH ON CANCER   (France)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TAMPERE   (Finland)

Author keywords

Cervix cancer; Loss to follow up; Survival

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY; CANCER REGISTRY; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURVIVAL; CANCER THERAPY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; ONSET AGE; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SURVIVAL TIME; THAILAND; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; EPIDEMIOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; PATHOLOGY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; SURVIVAL; UTERINE CERVIX TUMOR;

ADULT; AGE OF ONSET; AGED; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; PROGNOSIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; THAILAND; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 3343017593     PISSN: 00070920     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601959     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Breslow N, Day NE (1980) The Analysis of Case - Control Studies. Statistical Methods in Cancer Research. Vol 1. IARC Scientific Publications No 32: Lyon, France
2. Cutler SJ, Ederer F (1958) Maximum utilization of the life table method in analyzing survival. J Chronic Dis 8: 699-712
3. Dickman P, Hakulinen T, Voutilainen E (2002) Surv3 Relative Survival Analysis Program Version 3.00b2. Finnish Cancer Registry: Helsinki, Finland
4. Ederer F, Lillian MA, Cutler SJ (1961) The relative survival rate: A statistical methodology. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 6: 101-121
5. Ganesh B (1995) Effect of Loss to Follow-up in Estimating Survival Rates. Ser A, Vol. 440. Acta Universitatis Tamperensis: Tampere
6. Hakulinen T (1982) Cancer survival corrected for heterogeneity in patient withdrawal. Biometrics 38: 933-942
7. Kogevinas M, Porta M (1997) Socioeconomic differences in cancer survival: a review of the evidence. In Social Inequalities and Cancer, Kogevinas M, Pearce N, Susser M and Boffetta P (eds) pp. 177-206, IARC Scientific Publication No 138: Lyon, France
8. Mathew A (1996) Removing Bias in Cancer Survival Estimates by Active Follow-up and Information on Determinants of Loss to Follow-up. Ser A, Vol 525. Acta Universitatis Tamperensis: Tampere
9. STATA (2001) Stata Software 2001. College Park, TX
10. Swaminathan R, Sankaranarayanan R, Hakama M, Shanta V (2002) Effect of loss to follow-up on population based cancer survival rates in developing countries. Int J Cancer 100(Suppl. 13): 172 (18th UICC Cancer Congress, 30 June-5 July 2002, Oslo, Norway - Abstract book)