Solution structure of the RWD domain of the mouse GCN2 protein

Protein Science

Volumn 13, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 2089-2100

  Nameki, Nobukazu ^a   Yoneyama, Misao ^a   Koshiba, Seizo ^a   Tochio, Naoya ^a   Inoue, Makoto ^a   Seki, Eiko ^a   Matsuda, Takayoshi ^a   Tomo, Yasuko ^a   Harada, Takushi ^a   Saito, Kohei ^a   Kobayashi, Naohiro ^a   Yabuki, Takashi ^a   Aoki, Masaaki ^a   Nunokawa, Emi ^a   Matsuda, Natsuko ^a   Sakagami, Noriko ^a   Terada, Takaho ^a,b   Shirouzu, Mikako ^a,b   Yoshida, Mayumi ^a   Hirota, Hiroshi ^a   Osanai, Takashi ^a   Tanaka, Akiko ^a   Arakawa, Takahiro ^a   Carninci, Piero ^a   Kawai, Jun ^a   Hayashizaki, Yoshihide ^a   Kinoshita, Kengo ^a,c,d   Güntert, Peter ^a   Kigawa, Takanori ^a   Yokoyama, Shigeyuki ^a,b,e   more..

^a RIKEN YOKOHAMA INSTITUTE   (Japan)

^b RIKEN HARIMA INSTITUTE   (Japan)

^c YOKOHAMA CITY UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d JAPAN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AGENCY   (Japan)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

GI domain; Hydrogen bond network; NMR; Protection factor; Protein structure

Indexed keywords

HELICASE; INITIATION FACTOR 2; PROTEIN; PROTEIN DEAD; PROTEIN GCN1; PROTEIN GCN2; PROTEIN RING; PROTEIN WD; UBIQUITIN CONJUGATING ENZYME; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ALPHA CHAIN; ALPHA HELIX; ARTICLE; BETA SHEET; BINDING SITE; EUKARYOTE; HYDROGEN BOND; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN MOTIF; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMALS; EIF-2 KINASE; MICE; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, BIOMOLECULAR; PROTEIN KINASES; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEIN-SERINE-THREONINE KINASES; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY, PROTEIN;

EUKARYOTA;

EID: 3342991427     PISSN: 09618368     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1110/ps.04751804     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Altschul, S.F., Madden, T.L., Schaffer, A.A., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Miller, W., and Lipman, D.J. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25: 3389-3402.
2. Aurora, R. and Rose, G.D. 1998. Helix capping. Protein Sci. 7: 21-38.
3. Bai, Y. Milne, S., Mayne, L., and Englander, S.W. 1993. Primary structure effects on peptide group hydrogen exchange. Proteins 17: 75-86.
4. Bax, A. 1994. Multidimensional nuclear magnetic resonance methods for protein studies. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 4: 738-744.
5. Berlanga, J.J., Santoyo, J., and De Haro, C. 1999. Characterization of a mammalian homolog of the GCN2 eukaryotic initiation factor 2α kinase. Eur. J. Biochem. 265: 754-762.
6. Chi, Y.H., Kumar, T.K., Kathir, K.M., Lin, D.H., Zhu, G., Chiu, I.M., and Yu, C. 2002. Investigation of the structural stability of the human acidic fibroblast growth factor by hydrogen-deuterium exchange. Biochemistry 41: 15350-15359.
7. Chou, K.C. 2001. Prediction of signal peptides using scaled window. Peptides 22: 1973-1979.
8. Cornell, W.D., Cieplak, P., Bayly, C.I., Gould, I.R., Merz, K.M., Ferguson, D.M., Spellmeyer, D.C., Fox, T., Caldwell, J.W., and Kollman, P.A. 1995. A second generation force field for the simulation of proteins, nucleic acids, and organic molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117: 5179-5197.
9. Cornilescu, G., Delaglio, F., and Bax, A. 1999. Protein backbone angle restraints from searching a database for chemical shift and sequence homology. J. Biomol. NMR 13: 289-302.
10. Delaglio, F., Grzesiek, S., Vuister, G.W., Zhu, G., Pfeifer, J., and Bax, A. 1995. NMRPipe: A multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes. J. Biomol. NMR 6: 277-293.
11. Dever, T.E. 1999. Translation initiation: Adept at adapting. Trends Biochem. Sci. 24: 398-403.
12. Doerks, T., Copley, R.R., Schultz, J., Ponting, C.P., and Bork, P. 2002. Systematic identification of novel protein domain families associated with nuclear functions. Genome Res. 12: 47-56.
13. Dong, J., Qiu, H., Garcia-Barrio, M., Anderson, J., and Hinnebusch, A.G. 2000. Uncharged tRNA activates GCN2 by displacing the protein kinase moiety from a bipartite tRNA-binding domain. Mol. Cell 6: 269-279.
14. Fernández, C., Szyperski, T., Bruyère, T., Ramage, P., Mösinger, E., and Wüthrich, K. 1997. NMR solution structure of the pathogenesis-related protein P14a. J. Mol. Biol. 266: 576-593.
15. Garcia-Barrio, M., Dong, J., Ufano, S., and Hinnebusch, A.G. 2000. Association of GCN1-GCN20 regulatory complex with the N-terminus of eIF2α kinase GCN2 is required for GCN2 activation. EMBO J. 19: 1887-1899.
16. Glaser, F., Pupko, T., Paz, I., Bell, R.E., Bechor-Shental, D., Martz, E., and Ben-Tal, N. 2003. ConSurf: Identification of functional regions in proteins by surface-mapping of phylogenetic information. Bioinformatics 19: 163-164.
17. Güntert, P., Mumenthaler, C., and Wüthrich, K. 1997. Torsion angle dynamics for NMR structure calculation with the new program DYANA. J. Mol. Biol. 273: 283-298.
18. Herrmann, T., Güntert, P., and Wüthrich, K. 2002. Protein NMR structure determination with automated NOE-identification in the NOESY spectra using the new software ATNOS. J. Biomol. NMR 24: 171-189.
19. Hinnebusch, A.G. and Natarajan, K. 2002. Gcn4p, a master regulator of gene expression, is controlled at multiple levels by diverse signals of starvation and stress. Eukaryot. Cell 1: 22-32.
20. Holm, L. and Sander, C. 1993. Protein structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices. J. Mol. Biol. 233: 123-138.
21. Hutchinson, E.G. and Thornton, J.M. 1994. A revised set of potentials for beta-turn formation in proteins. Protein Sci. 3: 2207-2216.
22. Johnson, B. and Blevins, R. 1994. NMRView: A computer program for the visualization and analysis of NMR data. J. Biomol. NMR 4: 603-614.
23. Kawai, J., Shinagawa, A., Shibata, K., Yoshino, M., Itoh, M., Ishii, Y., Arakawa, T., Hara, A., Fukunishi, Y., Konno, H., et al. 2001. Functional annotation of a full-length mouse cDNA collection. Nature 409: 685-690.
24. Kigawa, T., Yabuki, T., Yoshida, Y., Tsutsui, M., Ito, Y., Shibata, T., and Yokoyama, S. 1999. Cell-free production and stable-isotope labeling of milligram quantities of proteins. FEBS Lett. 442: 15-19.
25. Koradi, R., Billeter, M., and Wüthrich, K. 1996. MOLMOL: A program for display and analysis of macromolecular structures. J. Mol. Graph. 14: 51-55.
26. Koradi, R., Billeter, M., and Güntert, P. 2000. Point-centered domain decomposition for parallel molecular dynamics simulation. Comput. Phys. Commun. 124: 139-147.
27. Kubota, H., Sakaki, Y., and Ito, T. 2000. GI domain-mediated association of the eukaryotic initiation factor 2α kinase GCN2 with its activator GCN1 is required for general amino acid control in budding yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 275: 20243-20246.
28. Kubota, H., Ota, K., Sakaki, Y., and Ito, T. 2001. Budding yeast GCN1 binds the GI domain to activate the eIF2α kinase GCN2. J. Biol. Chem. 276: 17591-17596.
29. Laskowski, R.A., Rullmannn, J.A., MacArthur, M.W., Kaptein, R., and Thornton, J.M. 1996. AQUA and PROCHECK-NMR: Programs for checking the quality of protein structures solved by NMR. J. Biomol. NMR 8: 477-486.
30. Lorick, K.L., Jensen, J.P., Fang, S., Ong, A.M., Hatakeyama, S., and Weissman, A.M. 1999. RING fingers mediate ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (E2)-dependent ubiquitination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 96: 11364-11369.
31. McGuffin, L.J., Bryson, K., and Jones, D.T. 2000. The PSIPRED protein structure prediction server. Bioinformatics 16: 404-405.
32. Olsen, D.S., Jordan, B., Chen, D., Wek, R.C., and Cavener, D.R. 1998. Isolation of the gene encoding the Drosophila melanogaster homolog of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae GCN2 eIF-2α kinase. Genetics 149: 1495-1509.
33. Qiu, H., Dong, J., Hu, C., Francklyn, C.S., and Hinnebusch, A.G. 2001. The tRNA-binding moiety in GCN2 contains a dimerization domain that interacts with the kinase domain and is required for tRNA binding and kinase activation. EMBO J. 20: 1425-1438.
34. Ramirez, M., Wek, R.C., and Hinnebusch, A.G. 1991. Ribosome association of GCN2 protein kinase, a translational activator of the GCN4 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell Biol. 11: 3027-3036.
35. Santoyo, J., Alcaide, J., Méndez, R., Pulido, D., and de Haro, C. 1997. Cloning and characterization of a cDNA encoding a protein synthesis initiation factor-2α (eIF-2α) kinase from Drosophila melanogaster. Homology to yeast GCN2 protein kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 272: 12544-12550.
36. Sattlegger, E. and Hinnebusch, A.G. 2000. Separate domains in GCN1 for binding protein kinase GCN2 and ribosomes are required for GCN2 activation in amino acid-starved cells. EMBO J. 19: 6622-6633.
37. Sivaraman, T., Arrington, C.B., and Robertson, A.D. 2001. Kinetics of unfolding and folding from amide hydrogen exchange in native ubiquitin. Nat. Struct. Biol. 8: 331-333.
38. Sood, R., Porter, A.C., Olsen, D.A., Cavener, D.R., and Wek, R.C. 2000. A mammalian homologue of GCN2 protein kinase important for translational control by phosphorylation of eukaryotic initiation factor-2α. Genetics 154.: 787-801.
39. Tong, H., Hateboer, G., Perrakis, A., Bernards, R., and Sixma, T.K. 1997. Crystal structure of murine/human Ubc9 provides insight into the variability of the ubiquitin-conjugating system. J. Biol. Chem. 272: 21381-21387.
40. VanDemark, A.P., Hofmann, R.M., Tsui, C., Pickart, C.M., and Wolberger, C. 2001. Molecular insights into polyubiquitin chain assembly: Crystal structure of the Mms2/Ubc13 heterodimer. Cell 105: 711-720.
41. Vazquez de Aldana, C.R., Marton, M.J., and Hinnebusch, A.G. 1995. GCN20, a novel ATP binding cassette protein, and GCN1 reside in a complex that mediates activation of the eIF-2 α kinase GCN2 in amino acid-starved cells. EMBO J. 14: 3184-3199.
42. Weissman, A.M. 2001. Themes and variations on ubiquitylation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2: 169-178.
43. Wek, S.A., Zhu, S., and Wek, R.C. 1995. The histidyl-tRNA synthetase-related sequence in the eIF-2 α protein kinase GCN2 interacts with tRNA and is required for activation in response to starvation for different amino acids. Mol. Cell Biol. 15: 4497-4506.
44. Wishart, D.S., Sykes, B.D., and Richards, F.M. 1991. Relationship between nuclear magnetic resonance chemical shift and protein secondary structure. J. Mol. Biol. 222: 311-333.
45. Wüthrich, K. 1986. NMR of proteins and nucleic acids. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
46. Yamada, Y., Hagiwara, Y., Shiokawa, K., Sakaki, Y., and Ito, T. 1999. Spatiotemporal, allelic, and enforced expression of Ximpact, the Xenopus homolog of mouse imprinted gene impact. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 256: 162-169.
47. Yao, J., Feher, V.A., Espejo, B.F., Reymond, M.T., Wright, P.E., and Dyson, H.J. 1994. Stabilization of a type VI turn in a family of linear peptides in water solution. J. Mol. Biol. 243: 736-753.
48. Zhang, P., McGrath, B.C., Reinert, J., Olsen, D.S., Lei, L., Gill, S., Wek, S.A., Vattem, K.M., Wek, R.C., Kimball, S.R., et al. 2002. The GCN2 eIF2α kinase is required for adaptation to amino acid deprivation in mice. Mol. Cell Biol. 22: 6681-6688.
49. Zhu, S. and Wek, R.C. 1998. Ribosome-binding domain of eukaryotic initiation factor-2 kinase GCN2 facilitates translation control. J. Biol. Chem. 273: 1808-1814.
50. Zhu, S., Sobolev, A.Y., and Wek, R.C. 1996. Histidyl-tRNA synthetase-related sequences in GCN2 protein kinase regulate in vitro phosphorylation of eIF-2. J. Biol. Chem. 271: 24989-24994.