Clinical comparative study of aquacel and paraffin gauze dressing for split-skin donor site treatment

Annals of Plastic Surgery

Volumn 53, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 132-136

  Barnea, Yoav ^a,b   Amir, Aharon ^a   Leshem, David ^a   Zaretski, Arik ^a   Weiss, Jerry ^a   Shafir, Raphael ^a   Gur, Eyal ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b TEL AVIV SOURASKY MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBOXYMETHYLCELLULOSE; PARAFFIN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DONOR SITE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYDROCOLLOID; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPLIT THICKNESS SKIN GRAFT; SURGICAL WOUND; WOUND DRESSING; WOUND HEALING;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BANDAGES; CARBOXYMETHYLCELLULOSE; EPITHELIUM; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OCCLUSIVE DRESSINGS; SKIN TRANSPLANTATION; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 3342989746     PISSN: 01487043     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.sap.0000112349.42549.b3     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Cadier MA, Clarke JA. Dermasorb versus Jelonet in patients with burns skin graft donor sites. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1996;17:246-251.
2. Innes ME, Umraw N, Fish JS, et al. The use of silver coated dressings on donor site wounds: a prospective, controlled matched pair study. Burns. 2001;27:621-627.
3. Rakel BA, Bermel MA, Abbott LI, et al. Split-thickness skin graft donor site care: a quantitative synthesis of the research. Appl Nurs Res. 1998;11:174-182.
4. Atiyeh BS, Ghanimeh G, Kaddoura IL, et al. Split-thickness skin graft donor site dressing: preliminary results of a controlled, clinical comparative study of MEBO and Sofra-Tulle. Ann Plast Surg. 2001;46:87-88.
5. Disa JJ, Alizadeh K, Smith JW, et al. Evaluation of a combined calcium sodium alginate and bio-occlusive membrane dressing in the management of split-thickness skin graft donor sites. Ann Plast Surg. 2001;46:405-408.
6. Weber RS, Hankins P, Limitone E, et al. Split-thickness skin graft donor site management: a randomized prospective trial comparing hydrophilic polyurethane absorbent foam dressing with a petrolatum gauze dressing. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995;121:1145-1149.
7. Genecov DG, Schneider AM, Morykwas MJ, et al. A controlled subatmospheric pressure dressing increases the rate of skin graft donor site reepithelialization. Ann Plast Surg. 1998;40:219-225.
8. Kilinc H, Sensoz O, Ozdemir R, et al. Which dressing for split-thickness skin graft donor sites? Ann Plast Surg. 2001;46:409-414.
9. Lawrence JE, Blake GB. A comparison of calcium alginate and scarlet red dressings in the healing of split thickness skin graft donor sites. Br J Plast Surg. 1991;44:247-249.
10. Sawada Y, Yotsuyanagi T, Sone K. A silicone gel sheet dressing containing an antimicrobial agent for split thickness donor site wounds. Br J Plast Surg. 1990;43:88-93.
11. Ono I, Gunji H, Zhang JZ, et al. Studies on cytokines related to wound healing in donor site wound fluid. J Dermatol Sci. 1995;10:241-245.
12. Vloemans AF, Soesman AM, Kreis RW, et al. A newly developed hydrofibre dressing in the treatment of partial-thickness burns. Burns. 2001;27:167-173.
13. Field FK, Kerstein MD. Overview of wound healing in a moist environment. Am J Surg. 1994;167:2S-6S.
14. Hoekstra MJ, Hermans MH, Richters CD, et al. A histological comparison of acute inflammatory responses with a hydrofibre or tulle gauze dressing. J Wound Care. 2002;11:113-117.
15. Kawada A. Risk and preventive factors for skin phototype. J Dermatol Sci. 2000;23(suppl 1):S27-S29.
16. Baryza MJ, Baryza GA. The Vancouver Scar Scale: an administration tool and its interrater reliability. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1995;16:535-538.