Endoparasitic nematodes reduce multiplication of ectoparasitic nematodes, but do not prevent growth reduction of Ammophila arenaria (L.) Link (marram grass)

Applied Soil Ecology

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 65-75

  Brinkman, E Pernilla ^a   Van Veen, Johannes A ^a   Van Der Putten, Wim H ^a  

^a NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE OF ECOLOGY NIOO KNAW   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Competition; Generalist; Plant parasitic nematode; Population regulation; Specialist; Temporal nematode dynamics

Indexed keywords

AMMOPHILA ARENARIA; HETERODERA; HETERODERA ARENARIA; INVERTEBRATA; MELOIDOGYNE; MELOIDOGYNE MARITIMA; NEMATODA; PRATYLENCHUS; PRATYLENCHUS PENETRANS; TYLENCHORHYNCHUS;

EID: 3342978923     PISSN: 09291393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2004.02.004     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Akhtar M., Malik A. Roles of organic soil amendments and soil organisms in the biological control of plant-parasitic nematodes: a review. Bioresour. Technol. 74:2000;35-47
2. Christie J.R. The development of root-knot nematode galls. Phytopathology. 26:1936;1-22
3. Connell, J.H., 1990. Apparent versus 'real' competition in plants. In: Grace, J.B., Tilman, D. (Eds.), Perspectives on plant competition. Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 9-26.
4. De Deyn G.B., Raaijmakers C.E., Zoomer H.R., Berg M.P., de Ruiter P.C., Verhoef H.A., Bezemer T.M., van der Putten W.H. Soil invertebrate fauna enhances grassland succession and diversity. Nature. 422:2003;711-713
5. De Rooij-van der Goes P.C.E.M. The role of plant-parasitic nematodes and soil-borne fungi in the decline of Ammophila arenaria (L.) Link. New Phytol. 129:1995;661-669
6. Den Toom A.L. Influence of temperature and soil moisture on the relation between Tylenchorhynchus dubius and Lolium perenne. Neth. J. Plant Pathol. 94:1988;33-44
7. Duncan, L.W., Ferris, H., 1982. Interactions between phytophagous nematodes. In: Freckman, D. (Ed.), Nematodes in Soil Ecosystems. University of Texas Press, Austin, pp. 29-51.
8. Duncan L.W., Ferris H. Validation of a model for prediction of host damage by two nematode species. J. Nematol. 15:1983;227-234
9. Eisenback, J.D., 1985. Interactions among concomitant populations of nematodes. In: Sasser, J.N., Carter, W.W. (Eds.), An Advanced Treatise on Meloidogyne, vol. I: Biology and Control. North Carolina State University Graphics, Raleigh, pp. 193-213.
10. Eisenback, J.D., 1993. Interactions between nematodes in cohabitance. In: Khan, M.W. (Ed.), Nematode Interactions. Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 134-174.
11. Estores R.A., Chen T.A. Interaction of Pratylenchus penetrans and Meloidogyne incognita acrita as cohabitants on tomato. Phytopathology. 60:1970;1291
12. Griffiths B.S., Bengough A.G., Neilson R., Trudgill D.L. The extent to which nematode communities are affected by soil factors - a pot experiment. Nematology. 4:2002;943-952
13. Hewitt, E.J., 1966. Sand and water culture methods used in the study of plant nutrition, second ed. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux: Farnham Royal, Bucks, UK, 547 pp.
14. Holt R.D. Predation, apparent competition, and the structure of prey communities. Theor. Popul. Biol. 12:1977;197-229
15. Ingham R.E., Detling J.K. Effects of root-feeding nematodes on above-ground net primary production in a North-American grassland. Plant Soil. 121:1990;279-281
16. Kerry B.R. Rhizosphere interactions and the exploitation of microbial agents for the biological control of plant-parasitic nematodes. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 38:2000;423-441
17. Oostenbrink, M., 1960. Estimating nematode populations by some selected methods. In: Sasser, J.N., Jenkins, W.R. (Eds.), Nematology. The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, USA, pp. 85-102.
18. Powlsen D.S., Jenkinson D.S. The effects of biocidal treatments on metabolism in soil - II. Gamma irradiation, air-drying and fumigation. Soil Biol. Biochem. 8:1976;179-188
19. Rohlf, F.J., Sokal, R.R., 1981. Statistical tables, second ed. W.H. Freeman and Company, San Fransisco, 219 pp.
20. Sokal, R.R., Rohlf, F.J., 1995. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research, third ed. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, 887 pp.
21. Stanton N.L. The underground in grasslands. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 19:1988;573-589
22. Troelstra S.R., Wagenaar R., Smant W., Peters B.A.M. Interpretation of bioassays in the study of interactions between soil organisms and plants: involvement of nutrient factors. New Phytol. 150:2001;697-706
23. Umesh K.C., Ferris H., Bayer D.E. Competition between the plant-parasitic nematodes Pratylenchus neglectus and Meloidogyne chitwoodi. J. Nematol. 26:1994;286-295
24. Van der Putten W.H., Van der Stoel C.D. Plant parasitic nematodes and spatio-temporal variation in natural vegetation. Appl. Soil Ecol. 10:1998;253-262
25. Van der Putten W.H., Van Dijk C., Troelstra S.R. Biotic soil factors affecting the growth and development of Ammophila arenaria. Oecologia. 76:1988;313-320
26. Van der Putten W.H., Vet L.E.M., Harvey J.A., Wäckers F.L. Linking above- and belowground multitrophic interactions of plants, herbivores, pathogens, and their antagonists. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:2001;547-554
27. Van der Stoel, C.D., 2001. Specificity, pathogenicity and population dynamics of the endoparasitic nematode Heterodera arenaria in coastal foredunes. PhD Thesis. Wageningen University, The Netherlands, 135 pp.
28. Van der Stoel C.D., Van der Putten W.H., Duyts H. Development of a negative plant-soil feedback in the expansion zone of the clonal grass Ammophila arenaria following root formation and nematode colonization. J. Ecol. 90:2002;978-988
29. Van Tol R.W.H.M., Van der Sommen A.T.C., Boff M.I.C., Van Bezooijen J., Sabelis M.W., Smits P.H. Plants protect their roots by alerting the enemies of grubs. Ecol. Lett. 4:2001;292-294
30. Verschoor B.C. Carbon and nitrogen budgets of plant-feeding nematodes in grasslands of different productivity. Appl. Soil Ecol. 20:2002;15-25
31. Verschoor B.C., de Goede R.G.M., Brussaard L. Do plant parasitic nematodes have differential effects on the productivity of a fast- and a slow-growing grass species? Plant Soil. 243:2002a;81-90
32. Verschoor B.C., Pronk T.E., de Goede R.G.M., Brussaard L. Could plant-feeding nematodes affect the competition between grass species during succession in grasslands under restoration management? J. Ecol. 90:2002b;753-761
33. Vinson S.B. Parasitoid manipulation as a plant defence strategy. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 92:1999;812-828
34. Walker M., Jones T.H. Relative roles of top-down and bottom-up forces in terrestrial tritrophic plant-insect herbivore-natural enemy systems. Oikos. 93:2001;177-187
35. Wyss U., Zunke U. Observations on the behaviour of second stage juveniles of Heterodera schachtii inside host roots. Rev. Nématol. 9:1986;153-165
36. Yeates G.W., Bongers T., de Goede R.G.M., Freckman D.W., Georgieva S.S. Feeding habits in soil nematode families and genera - an outline for soil ecologists. J. Nematol. 25:1993;315-331
37. Yeates, G.W., Watson, R.N., Steele, K.W., 1985. Complementary distribution of Meloidogyne, Heterodera and Pratylenchus (Nematoda: Tylenchida) in roots of white clover. In: Chapman, R.B. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth Australian Conference on Grassland Invertebrate Ecology. Caxton Press, pp. 71-79.
38. Zunke U. Ectoparasitic feeding behaviour of the root lesion nematode, Pratylenchus penetrans, on root hairs of different host plants. Rev. Nématol. 13:1990a;331-337
39. Zunke U. Observations on the invasion and endoparasitic behavior of the root lesion nematode Pratylenchus penetrans. J. Nematol. 22:1990b;309-320