Truth, knowledge, new clothes1 responses to hamilton, kean, and pannabecker

Clothing and Textiles Research Journal

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 184-191

  Kaiser, Susan B ^a   Nagasawa, Richard H ^b   Hutton, Sandra S ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

Fashion; Symbolic interaction; Theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 3342942043     PISSN: 0887302X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0887302X9701500309     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Abercrombie, N., Lash, S., and Longhurst, B. (1992). Popular representation: Recasting realism. In S. Lash and J. Friedman (eds.),Modernity and identity (pp. 115-140). Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
2. Barnard, M. (1996). Fashion as communication. New York: Routledge.
3. Baudrillard, J. (1975). The mirror ofproduction. Trans. by M. Poster. St. Louis, MO: Telos Press.
4. Benstock, S., and Ferriss, S. (1994). Introduction. In S. Benstock and S. Ferriss (eds.), On fashion. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
5. Craik, J. (1994). The face of fashion: Cultural studies in fashion. New York: Routledge.
6. Davis, F. (1991). Herbert Blumer and the study of fashion: A reminiscence and a critique. Symbolic Interaction, 14(1), 1-21.
7. Davis, F. (1992). Fashion, culture, and identity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8. Ferguson, K.E. (1980). Self, society, and womankind: The dialectic of liberation. Westport, CN: Greenwood Press.
9. Ferguson, K.E. (1993). The man question: Visions of subjectivity in feminist theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.
10. Foucault, M., and Deleuze, G. (1977). Intellectuals and power. In Foucault (ed.), Language, counter-memory, and practice: Selected essays and interviews (pp. 205-217). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
11. Freitas, A.J., Kaiser, S.B., Chandler, J., Hall, C., Kim, J.W., and Hammidi, T. (In press). Appearance management as border construction: Least favorite clothing, group distancing, and identity.not! Sociological Inquiry.
12. Freitas, A.J., Kaiser, S.B., and Hammidi, T. (1996). Communities, commodities, space, and style. Journal of Homosexuality, 31(1/2), 83-107.
13. Garber, M. (1992). Vested interests: Cross-dressing and cultural anxiety. New York: Routledge.
14. Hamilton, J. (1997). The macro-micro interface in the construction of individual fashion forms and meanings. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 15(3), 164-171.
15. Hethorn, J. (1994). Gang identity or self-expression? Researchers look beyond the surface of "gang clothing" and appearance. California Agriculture, 48(7), 44-48.
16. Kaiser, S.B. (1997, forthcoming). The social psychology of clothing: Symbolic appearances in context (2nd edition revised). New York: Fairchild Publications.
17. Kaiser, S.B., Nagasawa, R.H., and Hutton, S.S. (1995). Construction of an SI theory of fashion: Part 1. Ambivalence and change. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 13(3), 172-183.
18. Kean, R. (1997). The role of the fashion system in fashion change: A response to the Kaiser, Nagasawa and Hutton model. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 15(3), 172-177.
19. Kennedy, P. (1993). Preparing for the twenty-first century. New York: Random House.
20. Levine, D.N. (1985). Theflightfrom ambiguity: Essays in social and cultural theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21. Mead, G.H. (1932). The philosophy of the present. Chicago: Open Court Publishing.
22. Pannabecker, R. (1997). Fashioning theory: A critical discussion of the symbolic interactionist theory of fashion. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal,15(3), 178-183.
23. Ritzer, G. (1991). Metatheorizing in sociology. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
24. Stephanson, A. (1987). Regarding postmodernism-A conversation with Fredric Jameson. Social Text, 17, 29-54.