Physiological behaviour of two peanut cultivars submitted to suppression watering;Comportamento fisiológico de duas cultivares de amendoim submetidas a diferentes regimes hídricos

Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira

Volumn 33, Issue 12, 1998, Pages 1963-1969

  Nogueira, Rejane J Mansur C ^a   Dos Santos, Roseane Cavalcanti ^b   Neto, Egídio Bezerra ^a   Dos Santos, Venézio Felipe ^c  

^a UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL RURAL DE PERNAMBUCO   (Brazil)

^b EMBRAPA CERRADOS   (Brazil)

^c UFRPE ^*

Author keywords

Arachis hypogaea; Diffusive resistance; Leaf water potential; Proline; Transpiration

Indexed keywords

ARACHIS HYPOGAEA;

EID: 3342941662     PISSN: 0100204X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. ALLEN, L.H.; BOOTE JUNIOR, K.J.; HAMMOND, L.C. Peanut stomatal diffusion resistance affected by soil water and solar radiation. Proceedings. Soil and Crop Science Society of Florida, v.35, p.42-46, 1976.
2. BATES, L.S.; WALDREN, R.P.; TEARE, I.D. Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies. Plant and Soil, v.39, p.205-207, 1973.
3. BHAGSARI, A.S.; BROWN, R.H.; SCHEPERS, J.S. Effect of moisture stress on photosynthesis and some related physiological characteristics in peanut. Crop Science, v.16, p.712-715, 1976.
4. BLUM, A.; EBERCON, A. Genotypic response in sorghum to growth stress. 111. Free proline accumulation and drought resistance. Crop Science, v.16, p.428-431, 1976.
5. BOOTE, K.J.; STANSELL, J.R.; SCHUBERT, A.M.; STONE, J.F. Irrigation, water use and water relation. In: PATEE, H.E.; YOUNG, C.T. (Eds.). Peanut Science and Technolog. Texas: American Press, 1982. ch 7, p. 164-205, 1982.
6. BURLE, M.L.; RODRIGUES, G.G. Relações hídricas internas da soja sob déficit hídrico em condições de campo. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, v.25, n.6, p.905-913, 1990.
7. GAUTREAU, J. Niveaux de potentiels foliaries intervarietanse et adaptation de l'arachide a la secheresse au Senegal. Oleagineux, v.32, p.323-332, 1978.
8. KARAMANOS, A.J.; DROSSOPOULOS, J.B.; NIAVIS, C.A. Free proline accumulation during development of two wheat cultivars with water stress. Journal of Agricultural Science, v.100, p.429-439, 1983.
9. LARCHER, W. Physiological plant ecology. Trad. de M. A. Bierdman-Thorson. Berlin: Spring-Verlag, 1975. 303p.
10. MARTINEZ, C.A.; MORENO, U. Expresiones fisiologicas de resistencia a la sequia en dos variedades de papa sometidas a estres hidrico en condiciones de campo. Revista Brasileira de Fisiologia Vegetal, v.4, n.1, p.33-38, 1992.
11. MEHKRI, A.A.; SASHIDHAR, V.R.; UDAYKUMAR, M.; KRISHNA SASTRY, K.S. Screening of varieties for relative drought tolerance in groundnut. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology, v.20, p.50-55, 1977.
12. NOGUEIRA, R.J.M.C. Efeitos do déficit hídrico no comportamento fisiológico de quatro cultivares de cana-de-açúcar (Saccharum sp.) adubadas ou não, com nitrogênio mineral. Recife: UFRPE, 1987. 156p. Dissertação de Mestrado.
13. PÁLFI, G.; JUHÁSZ, J. The theoretical basis and practical application of a new method of selection for determining water deficiency in plants. Plant & Soil, v.34, p.503-507, 1971.
14. PALLAS, J.E.; STANSELL JUNIOR, J.R.; KOSKE, T.J. Effects of drought on Florunner peanuts. Agronomy Journal, v.71, p.853-858, 1979.
15. PATEL, K.R.; MISTRY, P.D. Effect of periods of moisture availability on groundnut crop in the Sainashtra region of Gujarat. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science, v.51, n.4, p.266-270, 1981.
16. PATIL, S.; PANCHAL, Y.; JANARDHAN, K. Effect of short term moisture stress on free proline and relative water content in different plant parts of maize genotypes. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology, v.4, p.322-327, 1984.
17. PEREZ, S.C.J.G.A.; MORAES, J.A.P.V. Determinações de potencial hídrico, condutância estomática e potencial osmótico em espécies dos estratos arbóreo, arbustivo e herbáceo de um cerradão. Revista Brasileira de Fisiologia Vegetal, v.3, n.1, p.27-37, 1991.
18. SALINAS, A.P.R.; ZELENER, N.; CRAVIOTTO, R.M.; BISARO, Z. Respuestas fisiologicas que caracterizam el comportamiento de diferentes cultivares de soja a la diferença hídrica en el suelo. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília, v.31, n.5, p.331-338, 1996.
19. SCHOLANDER, P.F.; HAMMEL, H.T.; HEMINGSEN, E.A.; BRADSTREET, E.D. Hydrostatic pressure and osmotic potentials in leaves of mangroves and some other plants. Proceedings of National Academy Science, v.51, p.119-125, 1965.
20. TÁVORA, F.J.A.F.; MELO, F.I.O. Resposta de cultivares de amendoim a ciclos de deficiência hídrica: crescimento vegetativo, reprodutivo e relações hídricas. Ciência Agronômica, v.22, n.1/2, p.47-60, 1991.
21. WALDREN, R.P.; TEARE, I.D. Free proline accumulation in drought-stressed plants under laboratory conditions. Plant and Soil, v.40, p.689-692, 1974.
22. WYN JONES, R.G.; GORHAM, J. Osmoregulation. In: LANGE, D.L.; NOBEEL, P.S.; OSMOND, C.B.; ZIEGLER, H. Encyclopedia of plant physiology: physiological plant ecology. III-Response to chemical and biological environment. Springer-Verlag, Berlin: 1983. p.35-58.