Growth and development of imidazolinone-resistant and -susceptible smooth pigweed biotypes

Weed Science

Volumn 50, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 485-493

  Poston, Daniel H ^a,b   Wilson, Henry P ^a   Hines, Thomas E ^a  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Acetolactate synthase; ALS; Competition; Fitness; Herbicide resistance; Imidazolinone resistance; Imidazolinones

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; BIOTYPE; COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); FITNESS; HERBICIDE; WEED CONTROL;

AMARANTHUS HYBRIDUS;

EID: 3342939682     PISSN: 00431745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1614/0043-1745(2002)050[0485:GADOIR]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. 2 fixation in triazine-susceptible and -resistant smooth pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus). Weed Sci. 31:438-444.
2. Alcocer-Ruthling, M., D. C. Thill, and B. Shafii. 1992. Differential competitiveness of sulfonylurea resistant and susceptible prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola). Weed Technol. 6:303-309.
3. Anderson, D. D., L. G. Higley, A. R. Martin, and F. W. Roeth. 1996. Competition between triazine-resistant and -susceptible common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis). Weed Sci. 44:853-859.
4. Arnon, D. J. 1949. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol. 24:1-15.
5. Arntz, A. M., E. H. DeLucia, and N. Jordan. 2000. From fluorescence to fitness: variation in photosynthetic rate affects fecundity and survivorship. Ecology 81:2567-2576.
6. Chism, W. J., J. B. Birch, and S. W. Bingham. 1992. Nonlinear regressions for analyzing growth stage and quinclorac interactions. Weed Technol. 6:898-903.
7. Conrad, S. G. and S. R. Radosevich. 1979. Ecological fitness of Senecio vulgaris and Amaranthus retroflexus biotypes susceptible and resistant to atrazine. J. Appl. Ecol. 16:171.
8. Cousens, R. D., G. S. Gill, and J. Speijers. 1997. Comment: number of sample populations required to determine the effects of herbicide resistance on plant growth and fitness. Weed Res. 37:1-4.
9. Foes, M. J., L. Liu, P. J. Tranel, L. M. Wax, and E. W. Stoller. 1998. A biotype of common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) resistant to triazine and ALS herbicides. Weed Sci. 46:514-520.
10. Gaeddert, J. W., D. E. Peterson, and M. J. Horak. 1997. Control and cross-resistance of an acetolactate synthase inhibitor-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) biotype. Weed Technol. 11:132-137.
11. Gardner, F. P., R. B. Pearce, and R. L. Mitchell. 1985. Growth and development. Pages 187-208 in Physiology of Crop Plants. Ames, IA: Iowa State Press.
12. Gill, G. S., R. D. Cousens, and M. R. Allan. 1996. Germination, growth and development of herbicide resistant and susceptible populations of Lolium rigidum. Weed Sci. 44:252-256.
13. Gressel, J. and L. A. Segel. 1982. Interrelating factors controlling the rate and appearance of resistance: the outlook for the future. Pages 325-348 in H. M. LeBaron and J. Gressel, eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants. New York: J. Wiley.
14. Gressel, J. and L. A. Segel. 1990. Modeling the effectiveness of herbicide rotations and mixtures as strategies to delay or preclude resistance. Weed Technol. 4:186-198.
15. Heap, I. 2002. International Survey of Herbicide-Resistant Weeds. Herbicide Resistance Action Committee and Weed Science Society of America. Web page: http://www.weedscience.com. Accessed: January 2002.
16. Hinz, R. R. and M.D.K. Owen. 1997. Acetolactate synthase resistance in a common waterhemp population. Weed Technol. 11:13-18.
17. Hiscox, J. D. and G. F. Israelstram. 1979. A method for the extraction of chlorophyll from leaf tissue without maceration using dimethyl sulphoxide. Can. J. Bot. 57:1332.
18. Horak, M. J. and D. E. Peterson. 1995. Biotypes of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) and common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) are resistant to imazethapyr and thifensulfuron. Weed Technol. 9:192-195.
19. Jasieniuk, M., A. L. Brûle-Babel, and I. N. Morrison. 1996. The evolution and genetics of herbicide resistance in weeds. Weed Sci. 44:176-193.
20. Jordan, N., M. Kelrick, and W. Kinerk. 1999. Biorational management tactics to select against triazine-resistant smooth pigweed: a field trial. J. Appl. Ecol. 36:123-132.
21. Lovell, S. T., L. M. Wax, M. J. Horak, and D. E. Peterson. 1996. Imidazolinone and sulfonylurea resistance in a biotype of common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis). Weed Sci. 44:789-794.
22. Manley, B. S., H. P. Wilson, and T. E. Hines. 1996. Smooth pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus) and livid amaranth (Amaranthus lividus) to several imidazolinone and sulfonylurea herbicides. Weed Technol. 10:835-841.
23. Maxwell, B. D., M. L. Roush, and S. R. Radosevich. 1990. Predicting the evolution and dynamics of herbicide resistance in weed populations. Weed Technol. 4:2-13.
24. Poston, D. H., C. M. Hirata, and H. P. Wilson. 2002. Response of acetolactate synthase from imidazolinone-susceptible and -resistant smooth pigweed populations to various ALS inhibitors. Weed Sci. 50:306-311.
25. Poston, D. H., H. P. Wilson, and T. E. Hines. 2000. Imidazolinone resistance in several Amaranthus hybridus populations. Weed Sci. 48:508-513.
26. Saari, L. L., J. C. Cotterman, and D. C. Thill. 1994. Resistance to acetolactate synthase-inhibitor herbicides. Pages 83-139 in S. B. Powles and J.A.M. Holton, eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants: Biology and Biochemistry. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers.
27. Schmenk, R. E., M. Barrett, and W. E. Witt. 1997. An investigation of smooth pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus) resistance to acetolactate synthase inhibiting herbicides. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 37:296.
28. Silvertown, J. W. 1982. Introduction to Plant Population Ecology. London: Longman, p. 209.
29. Sprague, C. L., E. W. Stoller, L. M. Wax, and M. J. Horak. 1997. Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) and common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) resistance to selected ALS-inhibiting herbicides. Weed Sci. 45:192-197.
30. Thompson, C. R., D. C. Thill, and B. Shafii. 1994. Growth and competitiveness of sulfonylurea-resistant and -susceptible kochia (Kochia scoparia). Weed Sci. 42:172-179.