Crossing morpheme boundaries in Dutch

Lingua

Volumn 114, Issue 11, 2004, Pages 1367-1400

  van Oostendorp, Marc ^a  

^a Volkskunde en Naamkunde   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Dutch phonology; Phonology morphology interface; Prosody

Indexed keywords

EID: 3342911365     PISSN: 00243841     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2003.08.002     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Alderte, J., 2001. Morphologically Governed Accent in Optimality Theory. Routledge, New York & London
2. Booij, G., 1977. Dutch Morphology: A Study of Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Foris, Dordrecht
3. Booij, G., 1981. Generatieve Fonologie Van Het Nederlands. Het Spectrum, Utrecht/Antwerpen
4. Booij, G., 1995. The Phonology of Dutch. Clarendon Press, Oxford
5. Booij, G., 2002. The Morphology of Dutch. Oxford University Press, Oxford
6. Booij, G., van Santen, A., 1995. Morfologie: De Woordstructuur Van Het Nederlands. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam
7. Bye P.de Lacy P. Edge asymmetries in phonology and morphology NELS 30 2000 121-135
8. Cohen, A., Ebeling, C.L., Fokkema, K., van Holk, A.F.G., 1959. Fonologie Van Het Nederlands en Het Fries. Martinus Nijhoff, Den Haag
9. Cohn A. Stress in Indonesian and bracketing paradoxes Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 7 1989 38-73
10. Cohn A. McCarthy J. Alignment and parallelism in Indonesian phonology Working Papers of the Cornell Phonetics Laboratory 12 1998 53-137
11. de Haas, W., Trommelen, M., 1993. Morfologisch Handboek Van Het Nederlands: Een Overzicht Van de Woordvorming. SDU Uitgeverij, s-Gravenhage
12. Grijzenhout, J., 2002. Stress at the phonology-morphology interface. In: Kaufmann, I., Stiebels, B. (Eds.), Studia Grammatica: More than Words, vol. 53. Akademie Verlag, Berlin, pp. 15-45
13. Gussenhoven, C., 2000. Vowel Duration, Syllable Quantity and Stress in Dutch. Manuscript, University of Nijmegen [ROA-381]
14. Gussenhoven, C., 2003. Exceptional Word Stress in Dutch. Handout TIN-Day, Utrecht
15. Harris, J., 1993. Integrity of prosodic constituents and the domain of syllabification in Spanish and Catalan. In: Hale, K., Keyser, S.-J. (Eds.), The View from Building, vol. 20. MIT Press, Cambridge
16. Kager, R., 1995. Consequences of catalexis. In: van der Hulst, H., van de Weijer, J. (Eds.), HIL Phonology Papers I: Leiden in Last. Holland Academic Graphics, The Hague, pp. 269-298
17. Kager, R., 1999. Optimality Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
18. Kager, R., 2000. Stem stress and peak correspondence in Dutch. In: Dekkers, J., van der Leeuw, F., van de Weijer, J. (Eds.), Optimality Theory: Phonology, Syntax and Acquisition. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 234-263
19. Kiparsky, P., 1991. Catalexis. Manuscript, Stanford University
20. Krämer, M., 2003a. What is wrong with the right side? Edge (A)symmetries in Phonology and Morphology. Manuscript, University of Ulster [ROA-576]
21. Krämer, M., 2003b. Variation of s-Voicing in Two Varieties of Italian. Manuscript, University of Ulster [ROA-577]
22. Langeweg, S., 1988. The Stress System of Dutch. Ph.D. Dissertation, Leiden University
23. McCarthy, J., 2003. Sympathy, cumulativity, and the Duke-of-York gambit. In: Féry, C., van de Vijver, R. (Eds.), The Optimal Syllable. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 23-76
24. McCarthy, J., Prince, A., 1993a. Prosodic Morphology I: Constraint Interaction and Satisfaction. Manuscript, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and Rutgers University, New Brunswick
25. McCarthy, J., Prince, A., 1993b. Generalized alignment. Yearbook of Morphology, pp. 79-154
26. McCarthy J. Prince A. Faithfulness and reduplicative identity University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 18 1995 249-384
27. Nespor, M., Vogel, I., 1986. Prosodic Phonology. Foris, Dordrecht
28. Nouveau, D., 1994. Language Acquisition, Metrical Theory, and Optimality: A Case Study of Dutch Word Stress. Ph.D. Dissertation, Utrecht
29. Odden, D., Odden, M., 1985. Ordered reduplication in Kíhehe. Linguistic Inquiry, 497-503
30. Peperkamp, S., 1997. Prosodic Words. HAG, The Hague
31. Pesetsky, D., 1997. Optimality Theory and syntax: Movement and pronunciation. In: Archangeli, D., Langendoen, T. (Eds.), Optimality Theory: An Overview. Blackwell, Oxford, 134-170
32. Piggott G. Challenging the NoCoda hypothesis and other myths: A tale of two theories Glot International 6.8 2002 263-267
33. Prince, A., Smolensky, P., 1993. Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. RUCCS Technical Report 2. Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science, Piscataway, NJ.
34. Smith N. -Aar Leuvensche Bijdragen 65 1976 485-496
35. van der Hulst, H., 1984. Syllable Structure and Stress in Dutch. Ph.D. Dissertation, Leiden University
36. van Haeringen C.B. Het achtervoegsel -ing: mogelijkheden en beperkingen Nieuwe Taalgids 64 1971 449-468
37. van Oostendorp M. Lexicale variatie in optimaliteitstheorie Nederlandse Taalkunde 2 1997 133-154
38. van Oostendorp, M., 1999. Italian s-voicing as the result of interacting constraints. In: Hannahs, S.J., Davenport, M. (Eds.), Issues in Phonological Structure. Benjamins, Amsterdam
39. van Oostendorp, M., 2000. Phonological Projection. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin
40. van Oostendorp M. The phonological and morphological status of the prosodic word adjunct Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft 11 2002 209-236
41. Vennemann, T., 1988. Preference Laws for Syllable Structure. De Gruyter, Berlin
42. Zonneveld W. Schwa, superheavies, stress and syllables in Dutch The Linguistic Review 10 1993 59-110