Losing one’s marbles: Cultural property and indigenous thought

Contesting Art: Art, Politics and Identity in the Modern World

Volumn , Issue , 2020, Pages 165-181

  Napier, A David ^a  

^a MIDDLEBURY COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3342906526     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781003135739-6     Document Type: Chapter

References (26)

1. Barth, Frederik (1969), ‘Introduction’, in F. Barth (ed.), Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference. London: George Allen and Unwin, pp. 1-24
2. Benko, R.P. (1987), Protecting Intellectual Property Rights: Issues and Controversies. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research
3. Brownlie, I. (1992), Treaties and Indigenous Peoples. Oxford: Clarendon Press
4. Conason, J. (1986), ‘Homeless on the Range: Greed, Religion, and the Hopi-Navaho Land Dispute’, Village Voice, 29 July, pp. 19-26, 73
5. Geertz, Clifford (1964), ‘Internal Conversion in Contemporary Bali’, in J. Bastin and R. Roolvink (eds), Malayan and Indonesian Studies Presented to Sir Richard Winstedt. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 282-302
6. Gombrich, Richard (1988), Theravada Buddhism: A Social History from Ancient Benares to Modern Colombo. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul
7. Greenfield, Jeanette (1989), The Return of Cultural Treasures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
8. Highwater, J. (1985), ‘Controversy in Native American Art’, in Edwin L. Wade (ed.), The Arts of the North American Indian: Native Traditions in Evolution. New York: Hudson Hills Press/PhiIbrook Arts Center, Tulsa, pp. 222-42
9. Holm, B. and Reid, W. (1975), Indian Art of the Northwest Coast. Seattle: University of Washington Press
10. Humphrey, Caroline and Hugh-Jones, Stephen (eds) (1992), Barter, Exchange and Value. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
11. Lawrence, Peter (1964), Road Belong Cargo. Manchester: Manchester University Press
12. McBryde, I. (1985), Who Owns the Past? Melbourne: Oxford University Press
13. Merges, R.P. and Nelson, R.R. (1990), ‘On the Complex Economics of Patent Scope’, Columbia Law Review, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 839-916
14. Messenger, P.M. (1989), The Ethics of Collecting Cultural Property: Whose Culture? Whose Property? Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press
15. Moustakas, J. (1989), ‘Group Rights in Cultural Property: Justifying Strict Inalienability’, Cornell Law Review, vol. 74, pp. 1179-227
16. Napier, A. David (1986), Masks, Transformation, and Paradox. Berkeley: University of California Press
17. Napier, A. David (1992), Foreign Bodies. Berkeley: University of California Press
18. Napier, A. David (1994), ‘Saving or Enslaving: The Paradox of Intellectual Property’, Journal of the Anthropological Society of Oxford, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 49-58
19. Parry, Jonathan and Bloch, Maurice (eds) (1989), Money and the Morality of Exchange. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
20. Posey, Darrell (1990), ‘Intellectual Property Rights, and Just Compensation for Indigenous Knowledge’, Anthropology Today, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 13-16
21. Suchman, M.C. (1989), ‘Invention and Ritual: Notes on the Interrelation of Magic and Intellectual Property in Preliterate Societies’, Columbia Law Review, vol. 89, no. 6, pp. 1264-94
22. Turner, Terence (1992), ‘Defiant Images: The Kayapo Appropriation of Video’, Anthropology Today, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 5-16
23. Weiner, Annette B. (1985), ‘Inalienable Wealth’, American Ethnologist, vol. 12, pp. 52-65
24. Weiner, Annette B. (1992), Inalienable Possessions: The Paradox of Keeping-While-Giving. Berkeley: University of California Press
25. Woodmansee, M. (1994), The Author, Art, and the Market: Rereading the History of Aesthetics. New York: Columbia University Press
26. Worsley, Peter (1968), The Trumpet Shall Sound: A Study of ‘Cargo’ Cults in Melanesia. 2nd edn, London: MacGibbon and Kee