Method in the madness: Re-reading 'Paradox and Counterparadox' twenty-five years on

Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 437-442

  Campbell, David ^a  

^a TAVISTOCK CLINIC   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDE; CHILD ABUSE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CULTURAL FACTOR; DOMESTIC VIOLENCE; EDUCATION PROGRAM; FAMILY THERAPY; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PARENTAL BEHAVIOR; PUBLICATION; REVIEW; SCHIZOPHRENIA; TECHNIQUE; THEORETICAL MODEL; THINKING;

EID: 3342886127     PISSN: 13591045     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1359104504043925     Document Type: Review

References (9)

1. Andersen, H., & Goolishian, H. (1988). Human systems as linguistic systems: Evolving ideas for the implications in theory and practice. Family Process, 27, 371-393.
2. Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. San Francisco: Chandler.
3. Campbell, D. (2003). The mutiny and the bounty: The place of Milan ideas today. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 24(1), 15-25.
4. Hoffman, L. (2002). Family therapy: An intimate history. New York: Norton.
5. Minuchin, S. (1998). Where is the family in narrative family therapy? Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 24(4), 397-403.
6. Selvini Palazzoli, M., Boscolo, L., Cecchin, G., & Prata, G. (1978). Paradox and counterparadox. New York: Aronson.
7. Shands, H. (1971). The war with words. The Hague: Mouton.
8. Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J., & Jackson, D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication. New York: Norton.
9. White, M. (1986). Negative explanation, restraint and double description: A template for family therapy. Family Process, 25, 169-184.