A probabilistic approach to integrating dynamic data in reservoir models

Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering

Volumn 50, Issue 3-4, 2006, Pages 241-257

  Kashib, Tarun ^a   Srinivasan, Sanjay ^b  

^a ENCANA CORPORATION   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GEOSTATISTICAL RESERVOIR MODELS; PRODUCTION DATA INTEGRATION;

ITERATIVE METHODS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OIL WELL PRODUCTION; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES; PROBABILITY; STATISTICAL METHODS;

PETROLEUM RESERVOIR EVALUATION;

ITERATIVE METHODS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OIL WELL PRODUCTION; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES; PETROLEUM RESERVOIR EVALUATION; PROBABILITY; STATISTICAL METHODS;

GEOSTATISTICS; HYDROCARBON RESERVOIR;

EID: 33344478280     PISSN: 09204105     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2005.11.002     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. F. Alabert A.G. Journel New method for reservoir mapping Journal of Petroleum 1990 212-218
2. L. Bonet-Cunha D.S. Oliver R.A. Redner A.C. Reynolds Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods for conditioning a permeability field to pressure data Mathematical Geology 29 1 1997 61-91
3. J. Caers Markov chain theory for spatial stochastic simulation Report vol. 1 No. 12 1999 Stanford Center for Reservoir Forecasting Stanford University
4. J. Caers Methods for history matching under geological constraints 8th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery, Freiburg, Germany 2002
5. J. Chu W. Xu A.G. Journel 3-D implementation of geostatistical analyses - the Amoco case study J.M. Yarus R.L. Chambers Stochastic Modeling and Geostatistics. Principles, Methods and Case Studies AAPG Computer Applications in Geology vol. 3 1994 339-345
6. L. Chu A.C. Reynolds D.S. Oliver Computation of sensitivity coefficients for conditioning the permeability field to well-test pressure data In Situ 19 2 1995 179-223
7. G. de Marsily A.M. La Venue B.S. RamaRao M.G. Marietta Pilot point methodology for automated calibration of an ensemble of conditionally simulated transmissivity fields: 2. Application Water Resources Research 31 3 1995 495-516
8. D. Gamerman Markov Chain Monte Carlo Stochastic Simulation for Bayesian Inference 1997 Chapman and Hall London
9. J.J. Gomez-Hernandez A.G. Journel Stochastic Characterization of Gridblock Permeabilities SPE Formation Evaluation 9 2 1994 93-99
10. P. Goovaerts Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation 1997 University Press Inc. Oxford, New York
11. L. Hu Gradual deformation and iterative calibration of Gaussian-related stochastic models Mathematical Geology 32 1 2000 87-107
12. L. Hu Combining dependent realizations within the gradual deformation method Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the International Association for Mathematical Geology, IAMG2001, Cancún, Mexico 2001
13. A.G. Journel Geostatistics: Models and tools for the earth sciences Mathematical Geology 18 1 1986 119-140
14. A.G. Journel Combining knowledge from diverse sources: An alternative to traditional data independence hypotheses Mathematical Geology 34 5 2002 573-596
15. Kashib, T. (2003). A Probabilistic Approach to Dynamic Data Integration in Reservoir Models, M.Sc Thesis, University of Calgary.
16. Mezghani, M., Roggero, F. (2001). Combining gradual deformation and upscaling techniques for direct conditioning of fine scale reservoir models to dynamic data, SPE-71334, Presented at SPE Annual Technical Conference, New Orleans, Louisiana.
17. D.S. Oliver On conditional simulation to inaccurate data Mathematical Geology 28 6 1996 811-817
18. H. Omre H. Tjelmeland Petroleum geostatistics E.Y. Baafi N.A. Schofield Geostatistics Wollongong 1996 vol. 1 1997 Kluwer Academic Publishers 41-52
19. William H. Press Brian P. Flannery Saul A. Teukolsky William T. Vetterling 2nd edition Numerical Recipes in Fortran vol. 77 1992 Cambridge University Press
20. Srinivasan, S, 2000. Integration of Production Data in Reservoir Models: A Forward Modeling Perspective, Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University.
21. S. Srinivasan J. Caers Conditioning reservoir models to dynamic data - a forward modeling perspective SPE-62941, Presented at SPE Annual Technical Conference, Dallas, Texas 2000
22. S. Srinivasan A.G. Journel Simulation of permeability field conditioned to well test data SPE-49289, Presented at SPE Annual Technical Conference, New Orleans, Louisiana 1997
23. G. Xue A. Datta-Gupta Structure preserving inversion: An efficient approach to conditioning stochastic reservoir models to dynamic data SPE-38727, Presented at SPE Annual Technical Conference, San Antonio, Texas 1997
24. Z. Wu A.C. Reynolds D.S. Oliver Conditioning geostatistical models to two-phase production data SPE-56885, First Presented at SPE Annual Technical Conference 1998