APES: Attentively perceiving robot

Autonomous Robots

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 61-80

  Soyer, C ^a,b   Bozma, H I ^a   Istefanopulos Y ^a  

^a BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b NATO Consultation Command and Control Agency   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Active vision; Attention; Attentional sequences; Bubble model; Mobile robots; Robot vision; Selective perception; Sequence based recognition; Temporal recognition; Visual memory

Indexed keywords

EYE MOVEMENTS; INTEGRATION; MOBILE ROBOTS; OBJECT RECOGNITION; SENSORY PERCEPTION;

ACTIVE VISION; ATTENTION; ATTENTIONAL SEQUENCES; BUBBLE MODEL; SELECTIVE PERCEPTION; SEQUENCE BASED RECOGNITION; TEMPORAL RECOGNITION; VISUAL MEMORY;

COMPUTER VISION;

EID: 33344474340     PISSN: 09295593     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10514-006-5538-0     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Abbott, A.L. et al. 1993. Promising directions in active vision. International Journal of Computer Vision, 11(2):109-126.
2. Albus, J.S. 1991. Outline for a theory of intelligence. IEEE Trans. Syst., Man and Cybernetics, 21(3).
3. Aloimonos, J. 1990. Purposive and qualitative active vision. In Proceedings of Image Understanding Workshop.
4. Ballard, D.H. 1991. Animate vision. Artificial Intelligence, 48:57-86.
5. Ballard, D.H. and Brown, C.M. 1992. Principles of animate vision. CVIP: Image Understanding, 56(1).
6. Ballard, D.H. 1996. On the function of visual representations. In Perception, K. Akins (ed.), Oxford University Press, pp. 111-131.
7. Bozma, H.I. and Soyer, Ç. 1994. Shape identification using probabilistic models of attentional sequences. In Proceedings of Workshop on Machine Vision Applications, IAPR.
8. Chown, E., Kaplan, S., and Kortenkamp, D. 1995. Prototypes, location, and associative networks (PLAN): Towards a unified theory of cognitive mapping. Cognitive Science, 19:1-51.
9. Clark, J. 1999. Spatial attention and latencies in saccadic eye movements. Vision Research, 39:585-602.
10. Fiala, J.C. et al. 1994. TRICLOPS: A tool for studying active vision. International Journal of Computer Vision, 12(2/3):231-250.
11. Gallant, J.L., Connor, C.E., Rakshit, S., Lewis, J.W., and Van Essen, D.C. 1996. Neural responses to polar, hyperbolic and cartesian gratings in area V4 of the Macaque monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 76(4):2718-2739.
12. Gouras, P. 1986. Oculomotor system. In Principles of Neural Science, J.H. Schwartz and E.R. Kandel (eds.), Elsevier.
13. Gouras, P. and Bailey, C.H. 1986. The retina and phototransduction. In Principles of Neural Science, J.H. Schwartz and E.R. Kandel (eds.), Elsevier.
14. Greene, H.H. 1999. Temporal relationships between eye fixations and manual reactions in visual search. Acta Psychologica, 101:105-123.
15. Grosso, E., Manzotti, E., Tiso, R., and Sandini, G. 1995. A space-variant approach to oculomotor control. In Proceedings of International Symposium on Computer Vision, pp. 509-514.
16. Hubel, D.H. 1988. Eye, brain and vision. Scientific American Lib.
17. Huber, E. and Kortenkamp, D. 1998. A behavior-based approach to active stereo vision for mobile robots. Artificial Intelligence, 11:229-243.
18. Itti, L. and Koch, C. 2001. Computational modeling of visual attention. Nature Reviews, 2.
19. Julesz, B. 1995. Dialogues on Perception. MIT Book Press, Cambridge, MA.
20. Keskinpala, T. et al. 2003. Knowledge-sharing techniques for egocentric navigation, IEEE Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, pp. 2469-2476.
21. Kowler, E. 1995. Eye movements. In Visual Cognition, S.M. Kosslyn, D.N. Osherson (eds.), MIT Press, pp. 215-266.
22. Lago-Fernandez, L.F., Sanchez-Montanes, M.A., and Cobacho, F. 2001. A biologically inspired visual system for an autonomous robot. Neurocomputing, 38-40:1385-1391.
23. McGaugh, J.L., Weinberger, N.M., and Lynch, G. (eds.) 1995. Brain and Memory. Oxford University Press.
24. Noton, D. and Stark, L. 1971. Scan paths in eye movements during pattern recognition. Science, 171:308-311.
25. Palmer, J., Verghese, P., and Pavel, M. 2000. The psychophysics of visual search. Vision Research, 40:1227-1268.
26. Papanikolopoulos, N.P. 1994. Adaptive control, visual servoing, and controlled active vision. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.
27. Peters, R.A. et al. 2001. The sensory ego-sphere as a short-term memory for humanoids. In Proceedings of the IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots.
28. Rao, R.P.N. et al. 1996. Modeling saccadic tergeting in visual search. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 8 (NIPS*95), D. Touretzky, M. Mozer, and M. Hasselmo (eds.), MIT Press.
29. Rimey, R.D. and Brown, C.M. 1990. Selective attention as sequential behaviour: Modelling eye movements with an augmented hidden Markov model. Technical Report, The University of Rochester, Computer Science Department.
30. Rimey, R.D. and Brown, C. 1994. Control of selective perception using bayes nets and decision theory. International Journal of Computer Vision, 12(2/3):173-207.
31. Rybak, I.A., Gusakova, V.I., Golovan, A.V., Podladchikova, L.N., and Shevtsova, N.A. 1998. A model of attention-guided visual perception and recognition. Vision Research, Special Issue: Models of Recognition.
32. Schlingensiepen, K.H. et al. 1986. The importance of eye movements in the analysis of simple patterns. Vision Research, 26(7):1111-1117.
33. Shafer, G. 1976. A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press.
34. Shin, C.W., Inokuchi, S., and Kim, K.I. 1997. Retina-like visual sensor for fast tracking and navigation robots. Machine Vision and Applications, 10:1-8.
35. Soyer, Ç. and Bozma, H.I. 1997. Further experiments in classification of attentional sequences: Combining instantaneous and temporal evidence. In Proceedings of IEEE 8th International Conference on Advanced Robotics, ICAR.
36. Soyer, Ç., Bozma, H.I., and Istefanopulos, Y. 2000. A new memory model for selective perception systems. In Proceedings of IEEE RSC International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IROS.
37. Soyer, Ç. and Bozma, H.I. 2003. Attentional sequence based recognition: Markovian and Evidential Reasoning. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 33(6):937-950.
38. Soyer, Ç. 2002. A model of active and attentive vision. PhD dissertation. Bogazici University.
39. Stark, L. and Ellis, S.R. 1981. Scan paths revisited: Cognitive models direct active looking. In Eye Movements: Cognition and Visual Perception, Fisher, Monty and Senders (eds.), Erlbaum, NJ, pp. 193-226.
40. Tagare, H., Toyama, K., and Wang, J.G. 2001. A maximum likelihood strategy for directing attention during visual search. IEEE Transactions on PAMI, 23(5)-491-500.
41. Treisman, A. and Gelade, G. 1980. A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12:97-136.
42. Tsotsos, J.K. et al. 1995 Modeling visual attention via selective tuning. Artificial Intelligence, 78:507-545.
43. Viviani, P. 1990. Eye movements in visual search: Cognitive, perceptual and motor control aspects. In Eye Movements and Their Role in Visual and Cognitive Processes, Elsevier, pp. 71-112.
44. Wasson, G., Kortenkamp, D., and Huber, E. 1999. Integrating active perception with an autonomous robot architecture. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 29:175-180.
45. Westin, C. et al. 1996. Attention control for robot vision. In Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR, p. 726.
46. Yeap, W.K. 1988. Toward of a computational theory of cognitive maps. Artificial Intelligence, 34:297-360.
47. Yeap, W.K. and Jefferies, M.E. 1999. Computing a representation of the local environment. Artificial Intelligence, 107:265-301.
48. Zeki, S. 1992. The visual image in mind and brain. Scientific American, 267(3).
49. Zingale, C.M. and Kowler, E. 1987. Planning sequences of saccades. Vision Research, 27(8):1327-1341.