Communication deficiencies in research and monitoring by ethics committees

Internal Medicine Journal

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 86-91

  Karunaratne, A S ^a   Myles, P S ^a   Ago, M J ^a   Komesaroff, Paul A ^a  

^a ALFRED HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

Ethics; Ethics committees; Monitoring; Research

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; MONITORING; PERSONNEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; PUBLIC HOSPITAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RESEARCH ETHICS; RESEARCH SUBJECT; TEACHING HOSPITAL;

ADULT; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; ETHICS COMMITTEES; ETHICS, RESEARCH; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 33344472582     PISSN: 14440903     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2006.01016.x     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). National statement on ethical conduct in research involving humans. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia; 1999.
2. Nuffield Council on Bioethics (NCB). Annual Report 2000. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics; 2001.
3. Pickworth E. Should local research ethics committees monitor research they have approved? J Med Ethics 2000; 26: 330-3.
4. Wood A, Grady C, Emanuel EJ. The crisis in human participant research: identifying the problems and proposing solutions. In: National Institutes of Health http://www.bioethics.gov/background/emanuelpaper.html accessed 8 December 2005.
5. Smith T, Moore EJH. Review by a local medical research ethics committee of the conduct of approved research projects, by examination of patients' case notes, consent forms, and research records and by interview. BMJ 1997; 314: 1588-90.
6. Chalmers D, Pettit P. Towards a consensual culture in the ethical review of research. Med J Aust 1998; 168: 79-82.
7. Dodds S. Is the Australian HREC system sustainable? Monash Bioethics Rev 2002; 21: 43-8.
8. Cleary PD, Edgman-Levitan S. Health care quality: incorporating consumer perspectives. JAMA 1997; 278: 1608-12.
9. Benatar SR, Bhutta ZA, Daar AS, Hope T, MacRae S, Roberts LW et al. Clinical ethics revisited: responses. BMC Medical Ethics 2001; 2: 2.
10. Elly M, Friedman MAT, Garner D, Steinmetz AM. Doing Qualitative Research: Circles Within circles. London: The Palmer Press; 1991.
11. Miles MB, Huberman M. An Expanded Sourcebook: Qualitative Data Analysis, 2nd edn. London: Sage publications; 1994.
12. Strauss AL, Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research-Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd edn. London: Sage Publications; 1998.
13. Renwick M, Harvey R. Quality assurance in hospitals: report of a survey. Canberra, Australia: Australian Institute of Health; 1989.
14. Ward JE. Ethics review and use of reminder letter in postal surveys: are current practices compromising an evidence-based approach? Med J Aust 2003; 178: 43-4.