Cesarean delivery results in a family medicine residency using a specific training model

Family Medicine

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 103-109

  Heider, Allison ^a   Neely, Brian ^b   Bell, Laird ^c  

^a Family Practice and Obstetrics of Monett   (United States)

^b Bolivar Family Care Center   (United States)

^c CoxHealth Family Medicine Residency ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION PROGRAM; FAMILY MEDICINE; FEMALE; FETUS OUTCOME; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; REOPERATION; RESIDENCY EDUCATION; SKILL; TEACHING; TREATMENT INDICATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CURRICULUM; FAMILY PRACTICE; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 33344467131     PISSN: 07423225     EISSN: 07423225     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Martin JC, Avant RF, Bowman MA, et al; Future of Family Medicine Project Leadership Committee. The Future of Family Medicine: a collaborative project of the family medicine community. Ann Fam Med 2004;2 suppl:S3-S32.
2. Nesbitt T, Baldwin L. Access to obstetric care. Prim Care 1993;20:509-22.
3. QuickStats: Total and primary cesarean rate and vaginal birth after previous cesarean (VBAC) rate -United States, 1989-2003. MMWR 2005;54(2):46.
4. Cox SM, Werner CL, Hoffman B, Cunningham G. Williams obstetrics, 22nd edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2005.
5. Richards TA, Richards JL. A comparison of cesarean section morbidity in urban and rural hospitals: a 3-year retrospective review of 1,177 charts. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982;144:270-5.
6. Deutchman ME, Connor PD. Cesarean sections by family physicians: a national multisite study of outcomes and training. Presented at the American Academy of Family Physicians 1994 Annual Scientific Assembly Research Forum in Boston.
7. Bibliography Project for the 1991-1993 Task Force on Obstetrics. Revised May 29, 1996. Kansas City, Mo: American Academy of Family Physicians, 1996.
8. Chaska BW, Mellstrom MS, Grambsch PM, Nesse RE. Influence of site of obstetric care and delivery on pregnancy management and outcome. J Am Board Fam Pract 1988;1:152-63.
9. Deutchman ME, Sills D, Connor PD. Perinatal outcomes: a comparison between family physicians and obstetricians. J Am Board Fam Pract 1995;8:440-7.
10. Allen VM, O'Connell CM, Liston RM, Baskett TF. Maternal morbidity associated with cesarean delivery without labor compared with spontaneous onset of labor at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:477-82.
11. Suonio S, Saarikoski S, Vohlonen I, Kauhanen O. Risk factors for fever, endometritis, and wound infection after abdominal delivery. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1989;29:135-42.
12. Faro S, Fenner D. Urinary tract infections. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1998;41:744-54.
13. Smaill F, Hofmeyr GJ. Antibiotic prophylaxis for cesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002;(3):CD000933.
14. Goepfert A. The MFMU cesarean registry: infectious morbidity following primary cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:S192.
15. Gherman RB, Goodwin TM, Leung B, et al. Incidence, clinical characteristics, and timing of objectively diagnosed venous thromboembolism during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94:730-4.
16. Maternity and gynecologic care. Developed by a joint task force of the American Academy of Family Physicians and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Kansas City, Mo: American Academy of Family Physicians, published July 1980, revised March 1998.
17. Nesbitt TS, Connell FA, Hart GL, Rosenblatt RA. Access to obstetric care in rural areas: effect on birth outcomes. Am J Public Health 1990;80:814-8.