Finger-assisted stretching technique for cesarean section

International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics

Volumn 92, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 212-216

  Song, S H ^a   Oh, M J ^a   Kim, T ^a   Hur, J Y ^a   Saw, H S ^a   Park, Y K ^a  

^a Korea University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Cesarean section; Finger assisted stretching technique; Traditional technique

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; METHODOLOGY; MICTURITION DISORDER; MUSCLE STRETCHING; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; WOUND INFECTION;

EID: 33344455569     PISSN: 00207292     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2005.10.028     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. J.M. Kerr The technique of cesarean section with special reference to the lower uterine segment incision Am J Obstet Gynecol 12 1926 729 734
2. S. Joel-Cohen Abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy: new techniques based on time and motion studies 2nd ed. 1972 William Heinemann Medical Books Ltd London, England 8 11
3. M. Stark Technique of cesarean section: the Misgav Ladach method D.R. Popkin L.J. Peddle Women' Health Today vol. 10 1994 The Parthenon Publishing Group Montreal, Canada 81 85
4. E. Darj, and M.L. Nordstrom The Misgav Ladach method for cesarean section compared to the Pfannenstiel method Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 78 1999 37 41
5. M. Stark, Y. Chavkin, C. Kupfersztain, P. Guedj, and A.R. Finkel Evaluation of combinations of procedures in cesarean section Int J Gynecol Obstet 48 1995 273 276
6. M. Stark, and A.R. Finkel Comparison between the Joel-Cohen and Pfannenstiel incisions in cesarean section Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 53 1994 121 122
7. American Fertility Society Revised American Fertility Society Classification of Endometriosis Fertil Steril 43 1985 351 352
8. M. Hohlagschwandtner, E. Ruecklinger, P. Husslein, and E.A. Joura Is the formation of a bladder flap at cesarean necessary? A randomized trial Obstet Gynecol 98 2001 1089 1092
9. J.C. Hauth, J. Owen, and R.O. Davis Transverse uterine incision closure: one versus two layers Am J Obstet Gynecol 167 4 Pt 1 1992 1108 1111
10. J.M. Tucker, J.C. Hauth, P. Hodgkins, J. Owen, and C.L. Winkler Trial of labor after a one or two-layer closure of a low transverse uterine incision Am J Obstet Gynecol 168 1993 545 546
11. R.D. Jelsema, J.A. Wittingen, and K.J. Vander Kolk Continuous, nonlocking, single-layer repair of the low-transverse uterine incision J Reprod Med 38 1993 393 396
12. S.J. Chapman, J. Owen, and J.C. Hauth One- versus two-layer closure of a low transverse cesarean: the next pregnancy Obstet Gynecol 89 1997 16 18
13. J.M. Porter, F.H. McGregor Jr., D.C. Mullen, and D. Silver Fibrinolytic activity of mesothelial surfaces Surg Forum 20 1969 80 82
14. A.T. Raftery Effect of peritoneal trauma on peritoneal fibrinolytic activity and intraperitoneal adhesion formation Eur Surg Res 13 1981 397 3401
15. T.E. Elkins, T.G. Stovall, J. Warren, F.W. Ling, and N.L. Meyer A histologic evaluation of peritoneal injury and repair: implications for adhesion formation Obstet Gynecol 70 1987 225 228
16. H. Ellis Internal overhealing: the problem of intraperitoneal adhesions World J Surg 4 1980 303 306
17. W.B. Conolly, and F.O. Stephens Factors influencing the incidence of intraperitoneal adhesions: an experimental study Surgery 63 1968 976 979
18. D. Chelmow, E.J. Rodriguez, and M.M. Sabatini Suture closure of subcutaneous fat and wound disruption after cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis Obstet Gynecol 103 2004 974 980