Apple firmness: Creating a tool for product evaluation based on a sensory-instrumental relationship

Postharvest Biology and Technology

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 327-330

  Harker, F R ^a   Gunson, F A ^a   Triggs, C M ^b  

^a THE NEW ZEALAND INSTITUTE FOR PLANT AND FOOD RESEARCH LIMITED   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Apples; Firmness; Predicting quality

Indexed keywords

MALUS X DOMESTICA;

EID: 33244493291     PISSN: 09255214     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2005.10.013     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. F.R. Harker, F.A. Gunson, P.L. Brookfield, and A. White An apple a day: the influence of memory of consumer judgement of quality Food Qual. Prefer. 13 2002 173 179
2. F.R. Harker, J. Maindonald, S.H. Murray, F.A. Gunson, I.C. Hallett, and S.B. Walker Sensory interpretation of instrumental measurements 1: texture of apple fruit Postharvest Biol. Technol. 24 2002 225 239
3. F.R. Harker, R.J. Redgwell, I.C. Hallett, S.H. Murray, and G. Carter Texture of fresh fruit Hortic. Rev. 20 1997 121 224
4. Insightful Corporation S-PLUS 6 for Windows Guide to Statistics vol. 1 2001 Insightful Corporation Seattle, WA
5. F.W. Liu, and M.M. King Consumer evaluations of 'McIntosh' apple firmness HortScience 13 1978 162 163
6. P. Royston A remark on algorithm AS 181: the W-test for normality Appl. Stat. 44 1995 547 551
7. W.N. Venables, and B.D. Ripley Modern Applied Statistics with S-PLUS 2nd ed. 1997 Springer-Verlag
8. Washington State Department of Agriculture, 1999. Clarifying new Red Delicious inspections. Good Fruit Grower.